Advertisement

Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis

, Volume 127, Issue 2, pp 653–668 | Cite as

Al2O3–FSM16-supported cobalt catalyst: a promising novel Fischer–Tropsch synthesis catalyst

  • Ali KarimiEmail author
  • Ahmad Tavasoli
Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

High specific surface area ordered meso-porous solid (FSM16) was synthesized by using the organic template method. The surface acidity of solid (FSM16) was modified significantly with the addition of alumina content by impregnation of alumina nitrate aqueous solution with Si/Al molar ratios of 10. Al2O3–FSM16 and conventional γ-alumina-supported cobalt catalysts were introduced for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS). The catalysts were prepared using wet impregnation with a cobalt loading of 15.0 wt% and characterized by ICP, TPR, BET, XRD, TEM, NH3-TPD, TGA and H2 chemisorptions. Finally, the activity, selectivity and stability of the catalysts were assessed in FTS. The characterizations clearly confirmed that morphology of the Al2O3–FSM16 support (surface area, pore volume, pore size distribution and crystallite phase) can affect the catalyst performances. The proposed 15 wt% Co/Al2O3–FSM16 catalyst has shown surprising stability during 120 h continuous of FTS reaction and also at first 24 h of test run, increased the FTS rate from 0.15 to 0.34 g HC/gcat./h, CO conversion by about 68%; also the C5+ hydrocarbons increased, compared to that prepared by conventional γ-alumina support (Conndea Vista Catalox B g-alumina).

Keywords

γ-Alumina Cobalt catalyst Fischer–Tropsch synthesis Al2O3–FSM16 Activity and selectivity Stability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) for their support of this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Walter S, Malmberg S, Schmidt B, Liauw MA (2005) Mass transfer limitations in microchannel reactors. Catal Today 110(1–2):15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tavasoli A, Mortazavi Y, Khodadadi AA, Sadagiani K, Karimi A (2005) Effects of different loadings of Ru and Re on physico-chemical properties and performance of 15% Co/Al2O3 FTS catalysts. Iran J Chem Chem Eng 24(3):9–15Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karimi A, Nakhaei Pour A, Torabi F, Hatami B, Tavasoli A, Alaei MR, Irani M (2010) Fischer–Tropsch synthesis over ruthenium-promoted Co/Al2O3 catalyst with different reduction procedures. J Nat Gas Chem 19(5):503–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karimi A, Nassernejad B, Rashidi AM, Tavasoli A (2014) Functional group effect on carbon nanotube (CNT)-supported cobalt catalysts in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis activity, selectivity and stability. Fuel 117:1045–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Trépanier M, Dalai AK, Abatzoglou N (2010) Synthesis of CNT-supported cobalt nanoparticle catalysts using a microemulsion technique: role of nanoparticle size on reducibility, activity and selectivity in Fischer–Tropsch reactions. Appl Catal A Gen 374:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tavasoli A, Abatzoglou N, Trépanier M, Dalai AK (2008) Fischer–Tropsch synthesis over cobalt catalyst supported on carbon nanotubes in a slurry reactor. Appl Catal A Gen 345:134–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fratalocchi L, Visconti CG, Lietti L, Tronconi E, Cornaro U, Rossini S (2015) A novel preparation method for “small” eggshell Co/-Al2O3 catalysts: a promising catalytic system for compact Fischer–Tropsch reactors. Catal Today 246:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fratalocchi L, Visconti CG, Lietti L, Tronconi E, Rossini S (2016) Exploiting the effects of mass transfer to boost the performances of Co/γ-Al2O3 eggshell catalysts for the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Appl Catal A-Gen 512:36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haghtalab A, Shariati J, Mosayebi A (2019) Experimental and kinetic modeling of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis over nano structure catalyst of Co–Ru/carbon nanotube. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 126:1003–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fukuoka A, Higashimoto N, Sakamoto Y, Inagaki S (2001) Preparation and catalysis of Pt and Rh nanowires and particles in FSM-16. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 48:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kanda K, Uemichi Y, Kobayashi T, Andalaluna L, Sugioka M (2005) Catalytic performance of noble metals supported on Al2O3-modified MCM-41 for thiophene hydrodesulfurization. Stud Surf Sci Catal 156:747–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karimi S, Tavasoli A, Mortazavi Y, Karimi A (2015) Cobalt supported on graphene—a promising novel Fischer–Tropsch synthesis catalyst. Appl Catal A Gen 499:188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Da Costa P, Potvin C, Manoli JM, Breysse M, Djega-Mariadassou G (2001) Novel phosphorus-doped alumina-supported molybdenum and tungsten carbides: synthesis, characterization and hydrogenation properties. Catal Lett 72:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malek Abbaslou RM, Tavasoli M, Dalai AK (2009) Effect of pre-treatment on physico-chemical properties and stability of carbon nanotubes supported iron Fischer–Tropsch catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen 355:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jacobs G, Das TK, Zhang Y, Li Y, Racoillet G, Davis BH (2002) Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: support, loading, and promoter effects on the reducibility of cobalt catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen 233:263–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang Y, Li X, Ma H, Zhang H, Jiang Y, Wang H, Li Z, Wu J (2017) Effect of the desilication of H-ZSM-5 by alkali treatment on the catalytic performance in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 120:775–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang J, Chen J, Ren J, Sun Y (2003) Chemical treatment of γ-Al2O3 and its influence on the properties of Co-based catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Appl Catal A Gen 243:121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tiitta M, Nykänen E, Soininen P, Niinisto L, Leskela M, Lappalainen R (1998) Preparation and characterization of phosphorus-doped alumina oxide thin film. Mater Res Bull 33(9):1315–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Norouzi O, Safari F, Jafarian S, Tavasoli A, Karimi A (2017) Hydrothermal gasification performance of Enteromorpha intestinalis as an algal biomass for hydrogen-rich gas production using Ru promoted Fe–Ni/γ-Al2O3 nanocatalysts. Energy Convers Manag 141:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ahn C, Bae JW (2016) Fischer–Tropsch synthesis on the Al2O3-modified ordered mesoporous Co3O4 with an enhanced catalytic activity and stability. Catal Today 265:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van Steen E, Sewell GS, Makhothe RA, Micklethwaite C, Manstein H, de Lange M, O’Connor CT (1996) TPR study on the preparation of impregnated Co/SiO2 catalysts. J Catal 162:220–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pan X, Fan Z, Chen W, Ding Y, Luo H, Bao X (2007) Enhanced ethanol production inside carbon-nanotube reactors containing catalytic particles. Nat Mater 6:507–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Davari M, Karimi S, Tavasoli A, Karimi A (2014) Enhancement of activity, selectivity and stability of CNTs-supported cobalt catalyst in Fischer–Tropsch via CNTs functionalization. Appl Catal A 485:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Catalyst DivisionResearch Institute of the Petroleum IndustryTehranIran
  2. 2.School of Chemistry, College of ScienceUniversity of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations