Advertisement

Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis

, Volume 126, Issue 2, pp 587–600 | Cite as

Generalized mass action realizations of temperature dependent chemical reaction networks

  • Attila MagyarEmail author
Article
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

Generalized mass action systems are general descriptors in the sense that they are able to capture the structure and dynamic properties of chemical reaction networks even in intracellular environments. It has been shown that several results of chemical reaction network (CRN) theory carry over to the case of generalized mass action kinetics. It is known, however, that the most important properties of CRNs, including their deficiency, reversibility and balancing, are realization-dependent. Using model transformations a method is proposed for embedding the temperature dependent CRN models extended with energy balance into the class of generalized CRNs with positive real exponents. The embedding increases the state variables by two new ones with a nonlinear algebraic equation between them. Applying the tools for finding realizations of CRNs obeying the mass action law for this generalized case, realizations with prescribed properties (weak reversibility, zero deficiency) were searched in a simple case. It was found in this case that the minimum deficiency is 3, and no reversible realizations exists.

Keywords

Chemical reaction networks Realizations Dynamic behavior Kinetic phenomena Non-isothermal 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to express gratitude to Prof. Katalin Hangos for her continuous help and useful remarks.

Funding

This research is partially supported by the National Research, Development and Innovation Office—NKFIH through Grant No. 115694. A. Magyar was supported by the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

References

  1. 1.
    Boros B, Hofbauer J, Müller S (2017) On global stability of the lotka reactions with generalized mass-action kinetics. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 151(1):53–80.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10440-017-0102-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Feinberg M (1987) Chemical reaction network structure and the stability of complex isothermal reactors - I. The deficiency zero and deficiency one theorems. Chem Eng Sci 42(10):2229–2268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Figueiredo A, Filho TR, Brenig L (1998) Algebraic structures and invariant manifolds of differential systems. J Math Phys 39:2929–2946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hárs V, Tóth J (1981) On the inverse problem of reaction kinetics. In: Farkas M, Hatvani L (eds) Qualitative theory of differential equations. Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies, North-Holland, pp 363–379Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnston MD, Siegel D (2011) Linear conjugacy of chemical reaction networks. J Math Chem 49:1263–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnston MD, Siegel D, Szederkényi G (2013) Computing weakly reversible linearly conjugate chemical reaction networks with minimal deficiency. Math Biosci 241:88–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2012.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kokossis AC, Floudas C (1994) Optimization of complex reactor networks - II. Nonisothermal operation. Chem Eng Sci 49(7):1037–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Müller S, Regensburger G (2014) Generalized mass-action systems and positive solutions of polynomial equations with real and symbolic exponents (invited talk). In: Gerdt VP, Koepf W, Seiler WM, Vorozhtsov EV (eds) Computer algebra in scientific computing. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 302–323Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Samardzija N, Greller LD, Wassermann E (1989) Nonlinear chemical kinetic schemes derived from mechanical and electrical dynamical systems. J Chem Phys 90(4):2296–2304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Szederkényi G, Banga JR, Alonso AA (2012) CRNreals: a toolbox for distinguishability and identifiability analysis of biochemical reaction networks. Bioinformatics 28(11):1549–1550.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Szederkényi G, Hangos KM (2011) Finding complex balanced and detailed balanced realizations of chemical reaction networks. J Math Chem 49:1163–1179.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-011-9804-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Szederkényi G, Hangos KM, Csercsik D (2010) Computing realizations of reaction kinetic networks with given properties. In: Gorban AN, Roose D (eds) Coping with complexity: model reduction and data analysis. Lecture notes in computational science and engineering. Springer, New York, pp 253–267Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Szederkényi G, Hangos KM, Magyar A (2005) On the time-reparametrization of quasi-polynomial systems. Phys Lett A 334:288–294.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2004.11.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Szederkényi G, Hangos KM, Tuza Z (2012) Finding weakly reversible realizations of chemical reaction networks using optimization. MATCH Commun Math Comput Chem 67:193–212 arXiv:1103.4741 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tuza ZA, Ács B, Szederkényi G, Allgöwer F (2016) Efficient computation of all distinct realization structures of kinetic systems. IFAC 49:194–200Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PannoniaVeszprémHungary

Personalised recommendations