Advertisement

Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis

, Volume 124, Issue 2, pp 891–903 | Cite as

Study on sulfur-tolerant benzene hydrogenation catalyst based on Pt-encapsulated sodalite zeolite

Article

Abstract

The sulfur resistance, activity in benzene hydrogenation and hydrogen spillover of the Pt-encapsulated sodalite zeolite Pt/SOD-M have been investigated. The prepared of Pt/SOD-M zeolite catalyst by directly hydrothermal synthesis in the presence of Pt(NH3)4Cl2 metal precursor and subsequently performing ion exchange with aqueous nitrate solution. The characterization of framework structure, pore textural properties and the acidity of the obtained Pt/SOD-M by XRD, N2 adsorption–desorption and NH3-TPD, respectively. The hydrogen spillover of Pt/SOD-M before and after poisoning of H2S and its hybrid samples were examined by H2-TPD. Catalytic hydrogenation activity was measured by benzene hydrogenation. The results indicated that there is no catalytic hydrogenation activity for Pt/SOD-Na and Pt/SOD-K alone, whereas Pt/SOD-H and Pt/SOD ion exchanged with Mg2+, Ca2+ and Ba2+ show appreciable activity. Notably, alone Pt/SOD-H and Pt/SOD ion exchanged with Mg2+, Ca2+ and Ba2+ still show excellent catalytic benzene hydrogenation activity after poisoning of H2S. It was demonstrated that Pt/SOD-H, Pt/SOD-Mg, Pt/SOD-Ca and Pt/SOD-Ba not only can resist sulfur-poisoning, but also exhibit superior catalytic hydrogenation performance without mixing with spillover hydrogen receptor.

Keywords

Pt-encapsulated SOD zeolite Ion exchange Hydrogen spillover Hydrogenation Sulfur-tolerant 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (50972097).

Supplementary material

11144_2018_1376_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (640 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 639 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Corma A, Diaz-Cabanas MJ, Martínez-Triguero J, Rey F, Rius J (2002) A large-cavity zeolite with wide pore windows and potential as an oil refining catalyst. Nature 418(6897):514–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Primo A, Garcia H (2014) Zeolites as catalysts in oil refining. Chem Soc Rev 43(22):7548–7561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stanislaus A, Cooper BH (1994) Aromatic hydrogenation catalysis: a review. Catal Rev 36(1):75–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hu L, Xia G, Qu L, Li M, Li C, Xin Q, Li D (2001) The effect of chromium on sulfur resistance of Pd/HY–Al2O3 catalysts for aromatic hydrogenation. J Catal 202(2):220–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin SD, Song C (1996) Noble metal catalysts for low-temperature naphthalene hydrogenation in the presence of benzothiophene. Catal Today 31(1–2):93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guo S, Wang E (2011) Noble metal nanomaterials: controllable synthesis and application in fuel cells and analytical sensors. Nano Today 6(3):240–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bartholomew CH (2001) Mechanisms of catalyst deactivation. Appl Catal A 212(1):17–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Simon LJ, Van Ommen JG, Jentys A, Lercher JA (2001) Sulfur-tolerant Pt-supported zeolite catalysts for benzene hydrogenation: I. Influence of the support. J Catal 201(1):60–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen H, Yang H, Briker Y, Fairbridge C, Omotoso O, Ding L, Zheng Y, Ring Z (2007) Effect of hydrogen spillover on the hydrogenation of 1-hexene over diluted carbon molecular sieve supported Pt catalyst. Catal Today 125(3):256–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yuan C, Yao N, Wang X, Wang L, Lv D, Li X (2015) The SiO2 supported bimetallic Ni–Ru particles: a good sulfur-tolerant catalyst for methanation reaction. Chem Eng J 260:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lu Y, Chen J, Liu Y, Xue Q, He M (2008) Highly sulfur-tolerant Pt/Ce0.8Gd0.2O1.9 catalyst for steam reforming of liquid hydrocarbons in fuel cell applications. J Catal 254(1):39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheekatamarla PK, Lane AM (2006) Efficient sulfur-tolerant bimetallic catalysts for hydrogen generation from diesel fuel. J Power Source 153(1):157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Navarro RM, Pawelec B, Trejo JM, Mariscal R, Fierro JL (2000) Hydrogenation of aromatics on sulfur-resistant PtPd bimetallic catalysts. J Catal 189(1):184–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fujikawa T, Idei K, Ebihara T, Mizuguchi H, Usui K (2000) Aromatic hydrogenation of distillates over SiO2-Al2O3-supported noble metal catalysts. Appl Catal A 192(2):253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yasuda H, Sato T, Yoshimura Y (1999) Influence of the acidity of USY zeolite on the sulfur tolerance of Pd–Pt catalysts for aromatic hydrogenation. Catal Today 50(1):63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zheng J, Guo M, Song C (2008) Characterization of Pd catalysts supported on USY zeolites with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratios for the hydrogenation of naphthalene in the presence of benzothiophene. Fuel Process Technol 89(4):467–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu X, Smith KJ (2008) Acidity and deactivation of Mo2C/HY catalysts used for the hydrogenation and ring opening of naphthalene. Appl Catal A 335(2):230–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang H, Chen H, Chen J, Omotosb O, Ring Z (2006) Shape selective and hydrogen spillover approach in the design of sulfur-tolerant hydrogenation catalysts. J Catal 243(1):36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Im J, Shin H, Jang H, Kim H, Choi M (2014) Maximizing the catalytic function of hydrogen spillover in platinum-encapsulated aluminosilicates with controlled nanostructures. Nat Commun 5:3370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Khoobiar S (1964) Particle to particle migration of hydrogen atoms on platinum—alumina catalysts from particle to neighboring particles. J Phys Chem 68(2):411–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sermon PA, Bond GC (1980) Studies of hydrogen spillover. Part 4. Factors affecting hydrogen spillover and its reversal. J Chem Soc Faraday 76:889–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ueda R, Kusakari T, Tomishige K, Fujimoto K (2000) Nature of spilt-over hydrogen on acid sites in zeolites: observation of the behavior of adsorbed pyridine on zeolite catalysts by means of FTIR. J Catal 194(1):14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Prins R (2012) Hydrogen spillover. Facts and fiction. Chem Rev 112(5):2714–2738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Karim W, Spreafico C, Kleibert A, Gobrecht J (2017) Catalyst support effects on hydrogen spillover. Nature 541(7635):68–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Choi M, Yook S, Kim H (2015) Hydrogen spillover in encapsulated metal catalysts: new opportunities for designing advanced hydroprocessing catalysts. ChemCatChem 7(7):1048–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee S, Lee K, Im J, Kim H, Choi M (2015) Revisiting hydrogen spillover in Pt/LTA: effects of physical diluents having different acid site distributions. J Catal 325:26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liu F, Liu HL, Xue D, Li FX (2016) Crystal transformation synthesis, hydrogenation activity and sulfur-tolerant performance of Pt particles encapsulated in sodalite. J Fuel Chem Technol 44(4):477–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ohgoshi S, Nakamura I (1993) Hydrogenation of isobutylene by spiltover hydrogen from Pt/KA-zeolite to NaY-zeolite. Stud Surf Sci Catal 77:289–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huan Gao
    • 1
  • Fan Liu
    • 1
  • Da Xue
    • 1
  • Ruyue Han
    • 1
  • Fuxiang Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Special ChemicalsTaiyuan University of TechnologyTaiyuanChina

Personalised recommendations