Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis

, Volume 124, Issue 2, pp 873–889 | Cite as

Effect of copper and cerium on the performance of Ni-SBA-16 in the partial oxidation of methane

  • Zahra Shokoohi Shooli
  • Ali IzadbakhshEmail author
  • Ali Mohammad Sanati


In this research, the effect of Ce, Cu and Ce–Cu promoters on the performance of Ni/SBA-16 catalyst in partial oxidation of methane reaction was investigated. The Ni/SBA-16 catalyst with 9.1 wt% Ni content without promoter and Ni/SBA-16 catalyst promoted with cerium, copper, copper–cerium with equimolar to nickel content were prepared and their performance in methane partial oxidation reaction were evaluated. The prepared catalysts were characterized by XRD, N2 adsorption and EDX-FESEM analysis techniques. The N2 adsorption isotherms of catalyst samples showed that adding promoters to the Ni/SBA-16 catalyst partly decreased the surface area of catalysts. Furthermore, the results using XRD analysis partly demonstrated dispersion of nickel particle for catalyst Cu-promoted. Also, SEM analysis showed a similar size of nano crystallites in the range of 8–20 nm for all catalyst samples. The results of evaluation of catalytic activities of the catalysts showed high activity of unpromoted and Ce-promoted nickel catalyst in methane conversion (≈ 93%) remained stable for 3 h. The effects of other reaction parameters such as temperature, gas hourly space velocity and molar ratio of the feed were also evaluated and reported.


Mesoporous SBA-16 Nickel catalyst Partial oxidation of methane Syngas Hydrogen 



Authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Iran Nanotechnology Initiative Council (INIC).

Supplementary material

11144_2018_1375_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 2387 kb)


  1. 1.
    Agency IETr, IEA (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Freni S, Calogero G, Cavallaro S (2000) Hydrogen production from methane through catalytic partial oxidation reactions. J Power Sources 87(1):28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    López-Fonseca R, Jiménez-González C, de Rivas B, Gutiérrez-Ortiz JI (2012) Partial oxidation of methane to syngas on bulk NiAl2O4 catalyst. Comparison with alumina supported nickel, platinum and rhodium catalysts. Appl Catal A 437:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elmasides C, Kondarides D, Neophytides S, Verykios X (2001) Partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas over Ru/TiO2 catalysts: effects of modification of the support on oxidation state and catalytic performance. J Catal 198(2):195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Melchiori T, Di Felice L, Mota N, Navarro R, Fierro J, van Sint Annaland M, Gallucci F (2014) Methane partial oxidation over a LaCr0.85Ru0.15O3 catalyst: characterization, activity tests and kinetic modeling. Appl Catal A 486:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nematollahi B, Rezaei M, Khajenoori M (2011) Combined dry reforming and partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas on noble metal catalysts. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36(4):2969–2978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koh AC, Chen L, Leong WK, Johnson BF, Khimyak T, Lin J (2007) Hydrogen or synthesis gas production via the partial oxidation of methane over supported nickel–cobalt catalysts. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32(6):725–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khine MSS, Chen L, Zhang S, Lin J, Jiang SP (2013) Syngas production by catalytic partial oxidation of methane over (La0.7A0.3) BO3 (A = Ba, Ca, Mg, Sr, and B = Cr or Fe) perovskite oxides for portable fuel cell applications. Int J Hydrogen Energy 38(30):13300–13308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang H, Ruckenstein E (2001) Partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas over alkaline earth metal oxide supported cobalt catalysts. J Catal 199(2):309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Enger BC, Lødeng R, Holmen A (2008) A review of catalytic partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas with emphasis on reaction mechanisms over transition metal catalysts. Appl Catal A 346(1):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Qin D, Lapszewicz J (1994) Study of mixed steam and CO2 reforming of CH4 to syngas on MgO-supported metals. Catal Today 21(2–3):551–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mark MF, Maier WF (1996) CO2-reforming of methane on supported Rh and Ir catalysts. J Catal 164(1):122–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chu W, Yang W, Lin L (2002) The partial oxidation of methane to syngas over the nickel-modified hexaaluminate catalysts BaNiyAl12−yO19−δ. Appl Catal A 235(1):39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dai L-X, Teng Y-H, Tabata K, Suzuki E, Tatsumi T (2001) Catalytic application of Mo-incorporated SBA-1 mesoporous molecular sieves to partial oxidation of methane. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 44:573–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhu T, Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M (2001) Catalytic partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas over Ni–CeO2. Appl Catal A 208(1):403–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Claridge JB, Green ML, Tsang SC, York AP, Ashcroft AT, Battle PD (1993) A study of carbon deposition on catalysts during the partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas. Catal Lett 22(4):299–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang S, Lu G (1998) Reforming of methane with carbon dioxide over Ni/Al2O3 catalysts: effect of nickel precursor. Appl Catal A 169(2):271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang Y, Xiong G, Sheng S, Yang W (2000) Deactivation studies over NiO/γ-Al2O3 catalysts for partial oxidation of methane to syngas. Catal Today 63(2):517–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Habimana F, Li X, Ji S, Lang B, Sun D, Li C (2009) Effect of Cu promoter on Ni-based SBA-15 catalysts for partial oxidation of methane to syngas. J Nat Gas Chem 18(4):392–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaydouh M-N, El Hassan N, Davidson A, Casale S, El Zakhem H, Massiani P (2015) Effect of the order of Ni and Ce addition in SBA-15 on the activity in dry reforming of methane. C R Chim 18(3):293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wan H, Li X, Ji S, Huang B, Wang K, Li C (2007) Effect of Ni loading and CexZrixO2 promoter on Ni-based SBA-15 catalysts for steam reforming of methane. J Nat Gas Chem 16(2):139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang M, Shengfu J, Linhua H, Fengxiang Y, Chengyue L, Hui L (2006) Structural characterization of highly stable Ni/SBA-15 catalyst and its catalytic performance for methane reforming with CO2. Chin J Catal 27(9):777–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sun N, Wen X, Wang F, Peng W, Zhao N, Xiao F, Wei W, Sun Y, Kang J (2011) Catalytic performance and characterization of Ni–CaO–ZrO2 catalysts for dry reforming of methane. Appl Surf Sci 257(21):9169–9176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lucredio AF, Assaf JM, Assaf EM (2011) Methane conversion reactions on Ni catalysts promoted with Rh: influence of support. Appl Catal A 400(1):156–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Passos FB, Oliveira ER, Mattos LV, Noronha FB (2006) Effect of the support on the mechanism of partial oxidation of methane on platinum catalysts. Catal Lett 110(1–2):161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu D, Quek XY, Cheo WNE, Lau R, Borgna A, Yang Y (2009) MCM-41 supported nickel-based bimetallic catalysts with superior stability during carbon dioxide reforming of methane: effect of strong metal–support interaction. J Catal 266(2):380–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bartholomew CH (1982) Carbon deposition in steam reforming and methanation. Catal Rev Sci Eng 24(1):67–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu H, Li Y, Wu H, Yang W, He D (2014) Promoting effect of glucose and β-cyclodextrin on Ni dispersion of Ni/MCM-41 catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane to syngas. Fuel 136:19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang S, Muratsugu S, Ishiguro N, Tada M (2013) Ceria-doped Ni/SBA-16 catalysts for dry reforming of methane. ACS Catal 3(8):1855–1864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Park Y, Kang T, Lee J, Kim P, Kim H, Yi J (2004) Single-step preparation of Ni catalysts supported on mesoporous silicas (SBA-15 and SBA-16) and the effect of pore structure on the selective hydrodechlorination of 1,1,2-trichloroethane to VCM. Catal Today 97(2):195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Beck J, Vartuli J, Roth WJ, Leonowicz M, Kresge C, Schmitt K, Chu C, Olson DH, Sheppard E, McCullen S (1992) A new family of mesoporous molecular sieves prepared with liquid crystal templates. J Am Chem Soc 114(27):10834–10843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhao D, Huo Q, Feng J, Chmelka BF, Stucky GD (1998) Nonionic triblock and star diblock copolymer and oligomeric surfactant syntheses of highly ordered, hydrothermally stable, mesoporous silica structures. J Am Chem Soc 120(24):6024–6036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stagg S, Resasco D (1998) Effect of promoters on supported Pt catalysts for CO2 reforming of CH4. Stud Surf Sci Catal 119:813–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stagg-Williams SM, Noronha FB, Fendley G, Resasco DE (2000) CO2 reforming of CH4 over Pt/ZrO2 catalysts promoted with La and Ce oxides. J Catal 194(2):240–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Noronha FB, Fendley EC, Soares RR, Alvarez WE, Resasco DE (2001) Correlation between catalytic activity and support reducibility in the CO2 reforming of methane over Pt/CexZr1−xO2 catalysts. Chem Eng J 82(1):21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhao D, Feng J, Huo Q, Melosh N, Fredrickson GH, Chmelka BF, Stucky GD (1998) Triblock copolymer syntheses of mesoporous silica with periodic 50 to 300 angstrom pores. Science 279(5350):548–552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen L, Wang S, Chen C, Zhang N (2011) Catalytic partial oxidation of methanol over Au–Pd bimetallic catalysts: a comparative study of SBA-16, SBA-16-CeO2, and CeO2 as supports. Transit Met Chem 36(4):387–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ma Z, Yang H, Qin Y, Hao Y, Li G (2010) Palladium nanoparticles confined in the nanocages of SBA-16: enhanced recyclability for the aerobic oxidation of alcohols in water. J Mol Catal A 331(1):78–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Singha RK, Shukla A, Yadav A, Sain S, Pendem C, Konathala LSK, Bal R (2017) Synthesis effects on activity and stability of Pt-CeO2 catalysts for partial oxidation of methane. Mol Catal 432:131–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zahra Shokoohi Shooli
    • 1
  • Ali Izadbakhsh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ali Mohammad Sanati
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Petroleum, Gas and Petrochemical EngineeringPersian Gulf UniversityBushehrIran
  2. 2.Department of Environment, Persian Gulf Research InstitutePersian Gulf UniversityBushehrIran

Personalised recommendations