Director compensation and related party transactions
- 64 Downloads
This paper examines whether independent directors’ compensation is associated with related party transactions. We focus both on directors’ total compensation and their equity-based compensation. Employing hand-collected data for S&P 1500 firms, we find that independent directors’ compensation is significantly associated with related party transactions. Specifically, we find that the level of compensation is positively related to these transactions, but we do not find equity-based compensation to be associated with them. Next, we decompose the compensation measures into “market” (i.e., predicted) level and “excessive” components and find that the results are driven by the excessive components. This association between related party transactions and director compensation is moderated by corporate governance mechanisms, suggesting that the association between the two reflects a conflict of interest between insiders and shareholders.
KeywordsRelated party transactions Director compensation Board monitoring Corporate governance Disclosure Audit committees SFAS 57 Regulation S-X
JEL classificationG30 G31 G32 M10 M41
We appreciate valuable comments from Russel Lundholm (the Editor), an anonymous reviewer, Gus De Franco, Mark Kohlbeck, Shibin Tang, Baohua Xin, Ping Zhang, and seminar participants at the Rotman School of Management, the EAA conference, AAA conference, CFEA conference, and the CAAA conference. Hope gratefully acknowledges funding from the Deloitte Professorship.
- Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC). (1999). Report and recommendations of the blue ribbon committee on improving the effectiveness of corporate audit committees. New York, NY: New York Stock Exchange.Google Scholar
- Bryan, S., Hwang, L.-S., Klein, A., & Lilien, S. (2000). Compensation of outside directors: An empirical analysis of economic determinants. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1280674.Google Scholar
- Djankov, S., Porta, R. L., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics, Darden – JFE Conference Volume: Capital Raising in Emerging Economies, 88(3), 430–465.Google Scholar
- Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1998). Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. The American Economic Review, 88(1), 96–118.Google Scholar
- Hope, O.-K., Rao, P., Xu, Y., & Yue, H. (2019a). Information sharing between mutual funds and auditors. Working paper, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
- Hope, O.-K., Li, Y., Liu, Q., & Wu H.. 2019b. Protecting the Giant pandas: Newspaper censorship of negative news. Working paper, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
- Lu, R. H. (2018). Economic Consequences of Control-Procedures Disclosure: Evidence from the 2006 SEC Regulation on Related Party Transactions. Working paper, University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
- Perry, T. (2000). “Incentive Compensation for Outside Directors and CEO Turnover.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 236033. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar
- Vafeas, N. (1999). Determinants of the adoption of director incentive plans. J Account Aud Fin, 14(4), 453–474.Google Scholar