Advertisement

Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of TNO-AZL Preschool Children Quality of Life in children with cerebral palsy

  • Chia-ling ChenEmail author
  • I-hsuan Shen
  • Hsiang-Han Huang
  • Chung-yao Chen
  • Yi-ting Hsiao
  • Ching-yi Wu
  • Hsieh-Ching Chen
Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the TNO-AZL (Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research Academic Medical Centre) Preschool Children Quality of Life (TAPQOL) in children with cerebral palsy (CP).

Methods

Ninety-seven children with CP (60 males, 37 females; aged 1–6 years) and their caregivers were recruited from the rehabilitation programs of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan for this 6-month longitudinal follow-up study. The Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM) and TAPQOL outcomes were measured at baseline and at a 6-month follow-up. Responsiveness was examined using the standardized response mean (SRM). The distribution-based and anchor-based MCID were determined. The TAPQOL outcomes include physical functioning (PF), social functioning (SF), cognitive functioning (CF), and emotional functioning (EF) domains.

Results

The responsiveness of the TAPQOL for all of TAPQOL domains was marked (SRM = 1.12–1.54). The anchor-based MCIDs of TAPQOL for PF, SF, CF, EF, and total domains were 1.25, 3.28, 2.93, 2.25, and 1.73, respectively, which were similar to the distribution-based MCID values of TAPQOL, except in the PF domain. The distribution-based MCIDs of TAPQOL in various domains were 2.85–3.73 when effect size (ES) was 0.2, 7.13–9.32 when ES was 0.5, and 11.40–14.91 when ES was 0.8.

Conclusions

TAPQOL is markedly responsive to detect change in children with CP. The caregivers perceived the minimally important change in HRQOL of their children at a relatively low treatment efficacy. Researchers and clinicians can utilize TAPQOL data to determine whether changes in TAPQOL scores indicate clinically meaningful effects post-treatment and at the follow-up.

Keywords

Cerebral palsy Quality of life Responsiveness Minimal clinically important differences 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Maenner, M. J., Blumberg, S. J., Kogan, M. D., Christensen, D., Yeargin-Allsopp, M., & Schieve, L. A. (2016). Prevalence of cerebral palsy and intellectual disability among children identified in two US National Surveys, 2011–2013. Annals of Epidemiology,26(3), 222–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wichers, M. J., van der Schouw, Y. T., Moons, K. G., Stam, H. J., & van Nieuwenhuizen, O. (2001). Prevalence of cerebral palsy in The Netherlands (1977–1988). European Journal of Epidemiology,17(6), 527–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Suzuki, J., & Ito, M. (2002). Incidence patterns of cerebral palsy in Shiga Prefecture, Japan, 1977–1991. Brain and Development,24(1), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takeshita, K., Ando, Y., Ohtani, K., & Takashima, S. (1989). Cerebral palsy in Tottori, Japan. Benefits and risks of progress in perinatal medicine. Neuroepidemiology,8(4), 184–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Park, M. S., Kim, S. J., Chung, C. Y., Kwon, D. G., Choi, I. H., & Lee, K. M. (2011). Prevalence and lifetime healthcare cost of cerebral palsy in South Korea. Health Policy,100(2–3), 234–238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.09.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chang, M. J., Ma, H. I., & Lu, T. H. (2014). Estimating the prevalence of cerebral palsy in Taiwan: A comparison of different case definitions. Research in Developmental Disabilities,36C, 207–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rosenbaum, P., Paneth, N., Leviton, A., Goldstein, M., Bax, M., Damiano, D., et al. (2007). A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology,109, 8–14.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.tb12610.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, C. M., Hsu, H. C., Chen, C. L., Chung, C. Y., Chen, K. H., & Liaw, M. Y. (2013). Predictors for changes in various developmental outcomes of children with cerebral palsy: A longitudinal study. Research in Developmental Disabilities,34(11), 3867–3874.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.08.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, C. L., Chen, C. Y., Shen, I. H., Liu, I. S., Kang, L. J., & Wu, C. Y. (2013). Clinimetric properties of the Assessment of Preschool Children’s Participation in children with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities,34(5), 1528–1535.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.026.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu, K. P., Chuang, Y. F., Chen, C. L., Liu, I. S., Liu, H. T., & Chen, H. C. (2015). Predictors of participation change in various areas for preschool children with cerebral palsy: A longitudinal study. Research in Developmental Disabilities,37, 102–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.11.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vargus-Adams, J. (2005). Health-related quality of life in childhood cerebral palsy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,86(5), 940–945.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.10.036.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Varni, J. W., Burwinkle, T. M., Sherman, S. A., Hanna, K., Berrin, S. J., Malcarne, V. L., et al. (2005). Health-related quality of life of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: Hearing the voices of the children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology,47(9), 592–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lai, C. J., Chen, C. Y., Chen, C. L., Chan, P. S., Shen, I. H., & Wu, C. Y. (2017). Longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life in preschool children with cerebral palsy of different levels of motor severity. Research in Developmental Disabilities,61, 11–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.11.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Copay, A. G., Subach, B. R., Glassman, S. D., Polly, D. W., Jr., & Schuler, T. C. (2007). Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: A review of concepts and methods. Spine J,7(5), 541–546.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Crosby, R. D., Kolotkin, R. L., & Williams, G. R. (2003). Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,56(5), 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rai, S. K., Yazdany, J., Fortin, P. R., & Avina-Zubieta, J. A. (2015). Approaches for estimating minimal clinically important differences in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Research & Therapy,17, 143.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0658-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wright, A., Hannon, J., Hegedus, E. J., & Kavchak, A. E. (2012). Clinimetrics corner: A closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy,20(3), 160–166.  https://doi.org/10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Coon, C. D., & Cappelleri, J. C. (2016). Interpreting change in scores on patient-reported outcome instruments. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science,50(1), 22–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McGlothlin, A. E., & Lewis, R. J. (2014). Minimal clinically important difference: Defining what really matters to patients. The Journal of the American Medical Association,312(13), 1342–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fekkes, M., Theunissen, N. C., Brugman, E., Veen, S., Verrips, E. G., Koopman, H. M., et al. (2000). Development and psychometric evaluation of the TAPQOL: A health-related quality of life instrument for 1-5-year-old children. Quality of Life Research,9(8), 961–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rajmil, L., Abad, S., Sardon, O., Morera, G., Perez-Yarza, E. G., Moreno, A., et al. (2011). Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the TAPQOL: A health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instrument for 1- to 5-year-old children. International Journal of Nursing Studies,48(5), 549–556.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.09.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee, C. F., Chien, L. Y., Ko, Y. L., Chou, Y. H., Tai, C. J., & Liou, Y. M. (2005). Development and psychometric properties of the Chinese language version of the TAPQOL: A health-related quality of life instrument for preschool children. International Journal of Nursing Studies,42(4), 457–465.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.08.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bunge, E. M., Essink-Bot, M. L., Kobussen, M. P., van Suijlekom-Smit, L. W., Moll, H. A., & Raat, H. (2005). Reliability and validity of health status measurement by the TAPQOL. Archives of Disease in Childhood,90(4), 351–358.  https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2003.048645.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Palisano, R., Rosenbaum, P., Walter, S., Russell, D., Wood, E., & Galuppi, B. (1997). Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology,39(4), 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ottenbacher, K. J., Taylor, E. T., Msall, M. E., Braun, S., Lane, S. J., Granger, C. V., et al. (1996). The stability and equivalence reliability of the functional independence measure for children (WeeFIM). Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology,38(10), 907–916.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb15047.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sperle, P. A., Ottenbacher, K. J., Braun, S. L., Lane, S. J., & Nochajski, S. (1997). Equivalence reliability of the functional independence measure for children (WeeFIM) administration methods. American Journal of Occupational Therapy,51(1), 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lin, K. C., Chen, H. F., Chen, C. L., Wang, T. N., Wu, C. Y., Hsieh, Y. W., et al. (2012). Validity, responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important change of the Pediatric Motor Activity Log in children with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities,33(2), 570–577.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.10.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thissen, D., Liu, Y., Magnus, B., Quinn, H., Gipson, D. S., Dampier, C., et al. (2016). Estimating minimally important difference (MID) in PROMIS pediatric measures using the scale-judgment method. Quality of Life Research,25(1), 13–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1058-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Samsa, G., Edelman, D., Rothman, M. L., Williams, G. R., Lipscomb, J., & Matchar, D. (1999). Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: A general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II. Pharmacoeconomics,15(2), 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Eton, D. T., Cella, D., Yost, K. J., Yount, S. E., Peterman, A. H., Neuberg, D. S., et al. (2004). A combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scale. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,57(9), 898–910.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.01.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Revicki, D. A., Erickson, P. A., Sloan, J. A., Dueck, A., Guess, H., Santanello, N. C., et al. (2007). Interpreting and reporting results based on patient-reported outcomes. Value Health,10(2), S116–S124.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00274.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Oeffinger, D., Bagley, A., Rogers, S., Gorton, G., Kryscio, R., Abel, M., et al. (2008). Outcome tools used for ambulatory children with cerebral palsy: Responsiveness and minimum clinically important differences. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology,50(12), 918–925.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03150.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Newton, A. S., & Wild, C. T. (2016). Is it time to define minimally clinically important differences for patient-reported outcome measures used in alcohol brief intervention studies? Addiction,111(9), 1528–1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Samsa, G., Edelman, D., Rothman, M. L., Williams, G. R., Lipscomb, J., & Matchar, D. (1999). Determining clinically important differences in health status measures. Pharmacoeconomics,15(2), 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Anttila, H., Autti-Rämö, I., Suoranta, J., Mäkelä, M., & Malmivaara, A. (2008). Effectiveness of physical therapy interventions for children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review. BMC Pediatrics,8(1), 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Poley, M. J., Stolk, E. A., Tibboel, D., Molenaar, J. C., & Busschbach, J. J. (2004). Short term and long term health related quality of life after congenital anorectal malformations and congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Archives of Disease in Childhood,89(9), 836–841.  https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2002.016543.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Brouwer, C. N., Schilder, A. G., van Stel, H. F., Rovers, M. M., Veenhoven, R. H., Grobbee, D. E., et al. (2007). Reliability and validity of functional health status and health-related quality of life questionnaires in children with recurrent acute otitis media. Quality of Life Research,16(8), 1357–1373.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9242-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationChang Gung Memorial HospitalTao-YuanTaiwan
  2. 2.Graduate Institute of Early Intervention, College of MedicineChang Gung UniversityTao-YuanTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of Occupational Therapy, College of MedicineChang Gung UniversityTao-YuanTaiwan
  4. 4.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationChang Gung Memorial HospitalKeelungTaiwan
  5. 5.School of Medicine, College of MedicineChang Gung UniversityTao-YuanTaiwan
  6. 6.Department of Industrial Engineering and ManagementNational Taipei University of TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations