Joint association of bullying and cyberbullying in health-related quality of life in a sample of adolescents
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has been analyzed in relation to multiple psychosocial and health problems. However, only a few studies have analyzed the impact of bullying and cyberbullying on HRQoL. The main purpose of this study was to analyze the level of severity of bullying and cyberbullying on HRQoL. The effects of different roles, especially the conjunctions of of victim–cybervictim and bully–victim/cyberbully–cybervictim on HRQoL, were explored.
An analytical and cross-sectional study was conducted in a region of northern Spain. Random and representative sampling was employed. The participants included 12, 285 adolescents between 11 and 18 years of age, with a mean age of 14.69 ± 1.73. The Spanish version of the KIDSCREEN-27, the Spanish version of the European bullying intervention project questionnaire (EBIPQ), and the cyberbullying triangulation questionnaire (CTQ) were employed.
The prevalence of bullying victimization, cybervictimization, bullying perpetration, and cyberbullying perpetration was 12%, 8.1%, 10.4%, and 7%, respectively. Significant and negative correlations between all the dimensions of the EBIPQ and the CTQ with the KIDSCREEN-27 were found. Victimization and cybervictimization had more impact than bullying perpetration and cyberbullying perpetration, especially on psychological well-being and school environment. The mixed roles of the victim–cybervictim and victim–cybervictim/bully–cyberbully obtained lower scores than the remaining roles in all the dimensions of KIDSCREEN-27.
Those in mixed roles related to victimization and cybervictimization obtained the lowest scores in all HRQoL dimensions. The results enhance an understanding of the severity of the problem of bullying and cyberbullying and their impact on HRQoL.
KeywordsHealth-related quality of life Bullying Cyberbullying Child Adolescence
This research was funded by Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness, RTI2018-094212-B-I00: (CIBER-AACC); and by the International University of la Rioja, Project “Cyberpsychology” (Trienio Own Research Plan 4 [2017-2020]). We wish to thank the participating schools, their management teams, faculty, and, especially, the students and their families for realizing the importance of the study. We are especially grateful to the “Dirección General de Ordenación Académica e Innovación Educativa (Consejería de Educación y Cultura, Principado de Asturias, España).”
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
The study obtained the approval of legal guardians through a procedure with passive consent.
- 3.Seedhouse, D. (2001). Health: The foundations for achievement. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 5.da Silva-Júnior, I. F., Hartwig, A. D., Demarco, G. T., Stüermer, V. M., Scobernatti, G., Goettems, M. L., et al. (2018). Health-related quality of life of maltreated children and adolescents who attended a service center in Brazil. Quality of Life Research,27(8), 2157–2164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1881-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Salmela-Aro, K. (2011). Stages of adolescence. In B. Bradford Brown & M. J. Prinstein (Eds), Encyclopedia of adolescence (Vol. 1, pp. 360–368). Oxford: Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-373951-3.00043-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: Development and some important challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology,9(1), 751–780. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., & Runions, K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health,55(5), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Wilkins-Shurmer, A., O’Callaghan, M. J., Najman, J. M., Bor, W., Williams, G. M., & Anderson, M. J. (2003). Association of bullying with adolescent health-related quality of life. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health,39(6), 436–441. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1754.2003.00184.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Analitis, F., Velderman, M. K., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Detmar, S., Erhart, M., Herdman, M., … Group, T. E. K. (2009). Being bullied: associated factors in children and adolescents 8 to 18 years old in 11 european countries. Pediatrics, 123(2), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-0323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Smith, P. K., Shu, S., & Madsen, K. (2001). Characteristics of victims of school bullying: Developmental changes in coping strategies and skills. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 332–351). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- 21.Hidalgo-Rasmussen, C. A., Ramírez-López, G., Rajmil, L., Skalicky, A., & Hidalgo-San Martín, A. (2018). Bullying and health-related quality of life in children and adolescent Mexican students. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva,23(7), 2433–2441. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018237.16392016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.González-Cabrera, J., León-Mejía, A., Beranuy-Fargues, M., Gutiérrez-Ortega, M., Alvarez-Bardón, A., & Machimbarrena, J. M. (2018). Relationship between cyberbullying and health-related quality of life in a sample of children and adolescents. Quality of Life Research,27(10), 2609–2618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1901-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.González-Cabrera, J. M., León-Mejía, A., Machimbarrena, J. M., Balea, A., & Calvete, E. (2019). Psychometric properties of the cyberbullying triangulation questionnaire: A prevalence analysis through seven roles. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12518.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Kelly, E. V., Newton, N. C., Stapinski, L. A., Slade, T., Barrett, E. L., Conrod, P. J., et al. (2015). Suicidality, internalizing problems and externalizing problems among adolescent bullies, victims and bully-victims. Preventive Medicine,73, 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.01.020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology,7(3), 847–862.Google Scholar
- 31.The KIDSCREEN Group Europe. (2006). The KIDSCREEN Questionnaires—Handbook.Google Scholar
- 34.Corp, I. B. M. (2015). Statistical package for the social sciences for windows. Armonk: International Business Machines Corp.Google Scholar
- 35.Team, R. C. (2015). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: Foundation for Statistical ComputingGoogle Scholar
- 36.Revelle, W. (2015). R: a language and environment for statistical computing.Google Scholar
- 38.Elosua, P., & Zumbo, B. D. (2008). Reliability coefficients for ordered categorical response scales. Psichothema,20(4), 896–901.Google Scholar
- 39.McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
- 41.Smith, P. K. (2019). Narratives in research and interventions on cyberbullying among young people. In H. Vandebosch & L. Green (Eds.), Narratives in research and interventions on cyberbullying among young people (pp. 9–27). London: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04960-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Machimbarrena, J. M., Calvete, E., Fernández-González, L., Álvarez-Bardón, A., Álvarez-Fernández, L., & González-Cabrera, J. (2018). Internet risks: An overview of victimization in cyberbullying, cyber dating abuse, sexting, online grooming and problematic internet use. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112471.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 47.Calvete, E., Fernández-González, L., González-Cabrera, J. M., & Gámez-Guadix, M. (2018). Continued bullying victimization in adolescents: Maladaptive schemas as a mediational mechanism. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,47(3), 650–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0677-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 50.Smokowski, P. R., Evans, C. B. R., & Cotter, K. L. (2014). The differential impacts of episodic, chronic, and cumulative physical bullying and cyberbullying: The effects of victimization on the school experiences, social support, and mental health of rural adolescents. Violence and Victims,29(6), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-000761029.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 53.Pabian, S., & Vandebosch, H. (2016). An investigation of short-term longitudinal associations between social anxiety and victimization and perpetration of traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,45(2), 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0259-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 54.González-Cabrera, J., Balea, A., Vallina, M., Moya, A., & Laviana, O. (2017). Informe ejecutivo del Proyecto Ciberastur [CYBERASTUR Executive project report]. Oviedo. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/wLxQ6i. Accessed 28 Oct 2019.
- 60.Ortega-Barón, J., Buelga, S., Ayllón, E., Martínez-Ferrer, B., & Cava, M.-J. (2019). Effects of intervention program prev@cib on traditional bullying and cyberbullying. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,16(4), 527. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040527.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 62.Quintana-Orts, C., & Rey, L. (2018). Traditional bullying, cyberbullying and mental health in early adolescents: Forgiveness as a protective factor of peer victimisation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112389.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar