Advertisement

Feasibility and acceptability of intensive longitudinal data collection of activity and patient-reported outcomes during chemotherapy for breast cancer

  • Payton Solk
  • Kara Gavin
  • Jason Fanning
  • Whitney Welch
  • Gillian Lloyd
  • Alison Cottrell
  • Anne Nielsen
  • Cesar A. Santa Maria
  • William Gradishar
  • Seema A. Khan
  • Swati Kulkarni
  • Juned Siddique
  • Siobhan M. PhillipsEmail author
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) may help us better understand biopsychosocial determinants and outcomes of physical activity during chemotherapy, but may be burdensome for patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of using EMA to assess activity, symptoms, and motivation among early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Methods

Women were instructed to wear an accelerometer 24/7 (hip during day and wrist overnight). Text message prompts were sent 4 times/day concerning patient-reported symptoms and motivational factors for 10 consecutive days (3 days pre-, day of, and 6 days post-chemotherapy dose). These measures occurred at the beginning, middle, and end of a full course of chemotherapy. At study conclusion, participants reported on perceived study acceptability, burden, and reactivity.

Results

Of the 75 women who consented to participate, 63 (84%) completed all 3 assessment time points. Participants responded to 86% of total text prompts and had valid accelerometer data on 82% of study days. Compliance was similar across all time points. The majority (78%) rated their study experience as positive; 100% were confident in their ability to use study technology. Reactivity varied with 27% indicating answering symptom questions did not affect how they felt and 44% and 68% indicated answering questions and wearing the accelerometer, respectively, made them want to increase activity.

Conclusions

Findings indicate EMA methods are feasible for breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. EMA may help us better understand the biopsychosocial processes underlying breast cancer patients’ activity in the context of daily life.

Keywords

Physical activity Chemotherapy Breast cancer mHealth Patient-reported outcomes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Lynn Sage Cancer Research Foundation (Phillips) and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University. Dr. Welch and Dr. Gavin are supported on National Cancer Institute Training Grant aware number T32CA193193 (PI Spring). Dr. Phillips is also supported by the National Cancer Institute (K07CA196840).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of and approved by the Northwestern University IRB (STU00201472) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2008. (2011). http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09/. Accessed based on November 2010 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER website, 2011.
  2. 2.
    Medicine, I. O. (2005). In M. Hewitt, S. Greenfield, & E. Stovall (Eds.), From cancer patient to cancer survivor: Lost in transition. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Waart, H. V., Stuiver, M. M., Harten, W. H. V., Geleijn, E., Kieffer, J. M., Buffart, L. M., et al. (2015). Effect of low-intensity physical activity and moderate- to high-intensity physical exercise during adjuvant chemotherapy on physical fitness, fatigue, and chemotherapy completion rates: Results of the PACES randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33(17), 1918–1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mustian, K. M., Cole, C. L., Lin, P. J., Asare, M., Fung, C., Janelsins, M. C., et al. (2016). Exercise recommendations for the management of symptoms clusters resulting from cancer and cancer treatments. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 32(4), 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fairman, C. M., Focht, B. C., Lucas, A. R., & Lustberg, M. B. (2016). Effects of exercise interventions during different treatments in breast cancer. The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology, 14(5), 200–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Courneya, K. S., Segal, R. J., McKenzie, D. C., Dong, H., Gelmon, K., Friedenreich, C. M., et al. (2014). Effects of exercise during adjuvant chemotherapy on breast cancer outcomes. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 46(9), 1744–1751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Speck, R. M., Courneya, K. S., Masse, L. C., Duval, S., & Schmitz, K. H. (2010). An update of controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 4(2), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holick, C. N., Newcomb, P. A., Trentham-Dietz, A., Titus-Ernstoff, L., Bersch, A. J., Stampfer, M. J., et al. (2008). Physical activity and survival after diagnosis of invasive breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 17(2), 379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Irwin, M. L., Crumley, D., McTiernan, A., Bernstein, L., Baumgartner, R., Gilliland, F. D., et al. (2003). Physical activity levels before and after a diagnosis of breast carcinoma. Cancer, 97(7), 1746–1757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Littman, A. J., Tang, M.-T., & Rossing, M. A. (2010). Longitudinal study of recreational physical activity in breast cancer survivors. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 4(2), 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fassier, P., Zelek, L., Partula, V., Srour, B., Bachmann, P., Touillaud, M., et al. (2016). Variations of physical activity and sedentary behavior between before and after cancer diagnosis: Results from the prospective population-based NutriNet-Sante cohort. Medicine, 95, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Groef, A., Geraerts, I., Demeyer, H., Van der Gucht, E., Dams, L., de Kinkelder, C., et al. (2018). Physical activity levels after treatment for breast cancer: Two-year follow-up. The Breast, 40, 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maddocks, M., Byrne, A., Johnson, C. D., Wilson, R. H., Fearon, K. C., & Wilcock, A. (2010). Physical activity level as an outcome measure for use in cancer cachexia trials: A feasibility study. Supportive Care in Cancer, 18(12), 1539–1544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Broderick, J., Ryan, J., O’Donnell, D., & Hussey, J. (2014). A guide to assessing physical activity using accelerometry in cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 22(4), 1121–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shiffman, S., & Stone, A. A. (1998). Ecological momentary assessment: A new tool for behavioral medicine research. Technology and methods in behavioral medicine (pp. 117–131). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harvey, E. J., Rubin, L. F., Smiley, S. L., Zhou, Y., Elmasry, H., & Pearson, J. L. (2018). Mobile phone ownership is not a serious barrier to participation in studies: Descriptive study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(2), e21–e21.  https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen, K. Y., Janz, K. F., Zhu, W., & Brychta, R. J. (2012). Redefining the roles of sensors in objective physical activity monitoring. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 44(1 Suppl 1), S13–S23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ginexi, E. M., Riley, W., Atienza, A. A., & Mabry, P. L. (2014). The promise of intensive longitudinal data capture for behavioral health research. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 16(Suppl 2), S73–S75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maher, J. P., Rebar, A. L., & Dunton, G. F. (2018). Ecological momentary assessment is a feasible and valid methodological tool to measure older adults’ physical activity and sedentary behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kratz, A. L., Kalpakjian, C. Z., & Hanks, R. A. (2017). Are intensive data collection methods in pain research feasible in those with physical disability? A study in persons with chronic pain and spinal cord injury. Quality of Life Research, 26(3), 587–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hacker, E. D., & Ferrans, C. E. (2007). Ecological momentary assessment of fatigue in patients receiving intensive cancer therapy. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 33(3), 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sibaud, V., Lebœuf, N. R., Roche, H., Belum, V. R., Gladieff, L., Deslandres, M., et al. (2016). Dermatological adverse events with taxane chemotherapy. European Journal of Dermatology, 26(5), 427–443.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Godin, G., & Shephard, R. J. (1985). A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 10(3), 141.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Troiano, R. P., Berrigan, D., Dodd, K. W., Mâsse, L. C., Tilert, T., & McDowell, M. (2008). Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 40(1), 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yost, K. J., Eton, D. T., Garcia, S. F., & Cella, D. (2011). Minimally important differences were estimated for six patient-reported outcomes measurement information system-cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(5), 507–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rovniak, L. S., Anderson, E. S., Winett, R. A., & Stephens, R. S. (2002). Social cognitive determinants of physical activity in young adults: A prospective structural equation analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(2), 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Matthews, C. E., George, S. M., Moore, S. C., Bowles, H. R., Blair, A., Park, Y., et al. (2012). Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors and cause-specific mortality in US adults. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 95(2), 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jim, H. S., Small, B., Faul, L. A., Franzen, J., Apte, S., & Jacobsen, P. B. (2011). Fatigue, depression, sleep, and activity during chemotherapy: daily and intraday variation and relationships among symptom changes. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 42(3), 321–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bassett, D. R. (2000). Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 32(9), S471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tudor-Locke, C., Swift, D. L., Schuna, J. M., Dragg, A. T., Davis, A. B., Martin, C. K., et al. (2014). WalkMore: A randomized controlled trial of pedometer-based interventions differing on intensity messages. BMC Public Health, 14(1), 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    SAS Institute Inc. (2013). SAS/ACCESS® 9.4 Interface to ADABAS: Reference. Cary, N. S. I. I.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hartman, S., Marinac, C., Bellettiere, J., Godbole, S., Natarajan, L., Patterson, R., et al. (2017). Objectively measured sedentary behavior and quality of life among survivors of early stage breast cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 25(8), 2495–2503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Backman, M., Browall, M., Sundberg, C. J., & Wengström, Y. (2016). Experiencing health: Physical activity during adjuvant chemotherapy treatment for women with breast cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 21, 160–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stone, A. A., Broderick, J. E., Schwartz, J. E., Shiffman, S., Litcher-Kelly, L., & Calvanese, P. (2003). Intensive momentary reporting of pain with an electronic diary: Reactivity, compliance, and patient satisfaction. Pain, 104(1–2), 343–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dunton, G. F., Liao, Y., Intille, S. S., Spruijt-Metz, D., & Pentz, M. (2011). Investigating children’s physical activity and sedentary behavior using ecological momentary assessment with mobile phones. Obesity, 19(6), 1205–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dunton, G. F., Liao, Y., Kawabata, K., & Intille, S. (2012). Momentary assessment of adults’ physical activity and sedentary behavior: Feasibility and validity. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    McAuley, E. (1993). Self-efficacy and the maintenance of exercise participation in older adults. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16(1), 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Matthews, C. E., Keadle, S. K., Troiano, R. P., Kahle, L., Koster, A., Brychta, R., et al. (2016). Accelerometer-measured dose-response for physical activity, sedentary time, and mortality in US adults. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 104(5), 1424–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Payton Solk
    • 1
  • Kara Gavin
    • 1
  • Jason Fanning
    • 2
  • Whitney Welch
    • 1
  • Gillian Lloyd
    • 3
  • Alison Cottrell
    • 1
  • Anne Nielsen
    • 1
  • Cesar A. Santa Maria
    • 4
  • William Gradishar
    • 5
  • Seema A. Khan
    • 5
  • Swati Kulkarni
    • 5
  • Juned Siddique
    • 1
  • Siobhan M. Phillips
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Preventive MedicineNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Internal Medicine, Health and Exercise SciencesWake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Colorado at DenverDenverUSA
  4. 4.Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer CenterJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  5. 5.Department of MedicineNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations