Positive associations of optimism–pessimism orientation with pro-environmental behavior and subjective well-being: a longitudinal study on quality of life and everyday behavior
The aim of the present study was to investigate associations of the balance of optimism and pessimism orientations as personal traits with pro-environmental behavior and subjective well-being, i.e., life satisfaction.
A longitudinal questionnaire survey consisting of two waves were conducted with Japanese respondents within an interval of 3 months (N = 770, mean age 49.6 ± 15.23 years). Correlation analyses and structural equation modeling were conducted to identify relationships between pro-environmental behavior and positive and negative psychological states and orientations.
Results of both the two surveys indicated positive correlations of optimism–pessimism orientation (O/P ratio) and subjective well-being with pro-environmental behavior. Negative associations were also confirmed between depression, stress, and sleepiness and pro-environmental behavior. Structural equation modeling using the two-wave data revealed that O/P ratio is positively associated with pro-environmental behavior as longitudinal associations.
These results suggest that O/P ratio can be related to current and future engagement in pro-environmental behavior and improvement in subjective well-being which could lead to an environmentally sustainable society with enhanced quality of life.
KeywordsPro-environmental behavior Subjective well-being Optimism Pessimism Sleepiness Constructiveness Cross-lagged study
This study was funded by MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI Grant (No. 26550107).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Tsukuba Research Ethics Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.Swenson, M. R., & Wells, W. D. (1997). Useful correlates of pro-environmental behavior. In Social marketing: Theoretical and practical perspectives (pp. 91–109).Google Scholar
- 3.Corral-Verdugo, V., Mireles-Acosta, J., Tapia-Fonllem, C., & Fraijo-Sing, B. (2011). Happiness as correlate of sustainable behavior: A study of pro-ecological, frugal, equitable and altruistic actions that promote subjective wellbeing. Research in Human Ecology,18(2), 95–104.Google Scholar
- 4.Jacob, J., Jovic, E., & Brinkerhoff, M. B. (2009). Personal and planetary well-being: Mindfulness meditation, pro-environmental behavior and personal quality of life in a survey from the social justice and ecological sustainability movement. Social Indicators Research,93(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9308-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Rhodes, R. E., Beauchamp, M. R., Conner, M., de Bruijn, G.-J. G.-J., Kaushal, N., & Latimer-Cheung, A. (2015). Prediction of depot-based specialty recycling behavior using an extended theory of planned behavior. Environment and Behavior,47(9), 1001–1023. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514534066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.López-Mosquera, N., & Sánchez, M. (2011). Emotional and satisfaction benefits to visitors as explanatory factors in the monetary valuation of environmental goods. An application to periurban green spaces. Land Use Policy,28(1), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Kaiser, F. F. G. (1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,28(5), 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01712.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Chang, E. C., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & D’Zurilla, T. J. (1997). Optimism and pessimism as partially independent constructs: Relationship to positive and negative affectivity and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences,23(3), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)80009-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Carleton, R. N., Thibodeau, M. A., Teale, M. J. N., Welch, P. G., Abrams, M. P., Robinson, T., et al. (2013). The center for epidemiologic studies depression scale: A review with a theoretical and empirical examination of item content and factor structure. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058067.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 40.Huang, V., Beshai, S., Korol, S., & Nicholas Carleton, R. (2017). Configural and scalar invariance of the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale in Egypt and Canada: Differential symptom emphasis across cultures and genders. Psychiatry Research,250, 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.079.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 43.Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology,60, 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013). The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology,34, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W., Keizer, K., & Perlaviciute, G. (2014). An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology,38, 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar