Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 28, Issue 12, pp 3323–3332 | Cite as

Positive associations of optimism–pessimism orientation with pro-environmental behavior and subjective well-being: a longitudinal study on quality of life and everyday behavior

  • Naoko KaidaEmail author
  • Kosuke Kaida
Article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to investigate associations of the balance of optimism and pessimism orientations as personal traits with pro-environmental behavior and subjective well-being, i.e., life satisfaction.

Methods

A longitudinal questionnaire survey consisting of two waves were conducted with Japanese respondents within an interval of 3 months (N = 770, mean age 49.6 ± 15.23 years). Correlation analyses and structural equation modeling were conducted to identify relationships between pro-environmental behavior and positive and negative psychological states and orientations.

Results

Results of both the two surveys indicated positive correlations of optimism–pessimism orientation (O/P ratio) and subjective well-being with pro-environmental behavior. Negative associations were also confirmed between depression, stress, and sleepiness and pro-environmental behavior. Structural equation modeling using the two-wave data revealed that O/P ratio is positively associated with pro-environmental behavior as longitudinal associations.

Conclusions

These results suggest that O/P ratio can be related to current and future engagement in pro-environmental behavior and improvement in subjective well-being which could lead to an environmentally sustainable society with enhanced quality of life.

Keywords

Pro-environmental behavior Subjective well-being Optimism Pessimism Sleepiness Constructiveness Cross-lagged study 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI Grant (No. 26550107).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Tsukuba Research Ethics Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin,131(6), 803–855.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Swenson, M. R., & Wells, W. D. (1997). Useful correlates of pro-environmental behavior. In Social marketing: Theoretical and practical perspectives (pp. 91–109).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Corral-Verdugo, V., Mireles-Acosta, J., Tapia-Fonllem, C., & Fraijo-Sing, B. (2011). Happiness as correlate of sustainable behavior: A study of pro-ecological, frugal, equitable and altruistic actions that promote subjective wellbeing. Research in Human Ecology,18(2), 95–104.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jacob, J., Jovic, E., & Brinkerhoff, M. B. (2009). Personal and planetary well-being: Mindfulness meditation, pro-environmental behavior and personal quality of life in a survey from the social justice and ecological sustainability movement. Social Indicators Research,93(2), 275–294.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9308-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tapia-Fonllem, C., Corral-Verdugo, V., Fraijo-Sing, B., & Durón-Ramos, M. F. (2013). Assessing sustainable behavior and its correlates: A measure of pro-ecological, frugal, altruistic and equitable actions. Sustainability,5(2), 711–723.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su5020711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaida, N., & Kaida, K. (2016). Pro-environmental behavior correlates with present and future subjective well-being. Environment, Development and Sustainability,18(1), 111–127.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9629-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaida, N., & Kaida, K. (2016). Facilitating pro-environmental behavior: The role of pessimism and anthropocentric environmental values. Social Indicators Research,126(3), 1243–1260.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0943-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Young, R. (1985). Encouraging environmentally appropriate behavior: The role of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Environmental Systems,15(4), 281–292.  https://doi.org/10.2190/3FWV-4WM0-R6MC-2URB.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rhodes, R. E., Beauchamp, M. R., Conner, M., de Bruijn, G.-J. G.-J., Kaushal, N., & Latimer-Cheung, A. (2015). Prediction of depot-based specialty recycling behavior using an extended theory of planned behavior. Environment and Behavior,47(9), 1001–1023.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514534066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van der Linden, S. (2018). Warm glow is associated with low- but not high-cost sustainable behaviour. Nature Sustainability,1(1), 28–30.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-017-0001-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koenig-Lewis, N., Palmer, A., Dermody, J., & Urbye, A. (2013). Consumers’ evaluations of ecological packaging—Rational and emotional approaches. Journal of Environmental Psychology,37, 94–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brown, K. W., & Kasser, T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research,74(2), 349–368.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-8207-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prati, G., Albanesi, C., & Pietrantoni, L. (2017). Social well-being and pro-environmental behavior: A cross-lagged panel design. Human Ecology Review,23(1), 123–140.  https://doi.org/10.22459/HER.23.01.2017.07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, Y.-J., & De Young, R. (1993). Intrinsic satisfaction derived from office recycling behavior: A case study in Taiwan. Social Indicators Research,31, 63–76.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01086514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    George, M. (1991). State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Psychology,76(2), 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Milfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). The big five personality traits and environmental engagement: Associations at the individual and societal level. Journal of Environmental Psychology,32(2), 187–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.12.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hirsh, J. B. (2010). Personality and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology,30(2), 245–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Terrier, L., Kim, S., & Fernandez, S. (2016). Who are the good organizational citizens for the environment? An examination of the predictive validity of personality traits. Journal of Environmental Psychology,48, 185–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Busic-Sontic, A., Czap, N. V., & Fuerst, F. (2017). The role of personality traits in green decision-making. Journal of Economic Psychology,62, 313–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.06.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boeve-de Pauw, J., Donche, V., & Van Petegem, P. (2011). Adolescents’ environmental worldview and personality: An explorative study. Journal of Environmental Psychology,31(2), 109–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Forgeard, M. J. C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2012). Seeing the glass half full: A review of the causes and consequences of optimism. Pratiques Psychologiques,18, 107–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prps.2012.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    López-Mosquera, N., & Sánchez, M. (2011). Emotional and satisfaction benefits to visitors as explanatory factors in the monetary valuation of environmental goods. An application to periurban green spaces. Land Use Policy,28(1), 151–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hatfield, J., & Job, R. F. S. (2001). Optimism bias about environmental degradation: The role of the range of impact of precautions. Journal of Environmental Psychology,21(1), 17–30.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist,66(4), 290–302.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Twenge, J. M., Ciarocco, N. J., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., & Bartels, J. M. (2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,92(1), 56–66.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vinkers, C. H., Zorn, J. V., Cornelisse, S., Koot, S., Houtepen, L. C., Olivier, B., et al. (2013). Time-dependent changes in altruistic punishment following stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology,38(9), 1467–1475.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.12.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    von Dawans, B., Fischbacher, U., Kirschbaum, C., Fehr, E., & Heinrichs, M. (2012). The social dimension of stress reactivity: Acute stress increases prosocial behavior in humans. Psychological Science,23(6), 651–660.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611431576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sollberger, S., Bernauer, T., & Ehlert, U. (2016). Stress influences environmental donation behavior in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology,63, 311–319.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.10.017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kaiser, F. F. G. (1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,28(5), 395–422.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01712.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kaida, K., & Kaida, N. (2017). Wake up for the environment: An association between sleepiness and pro-environmental behavior. Personality and Individual Differences,104, 12–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment,49(1), 71–75.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Honold, J., Beyer, R., Lakes, T., & van der Meer, E. (2012). Multiple environmental burdens and neighborhood-related health of city residents. Journal of Environmental Psychology,32(4), 305–317.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zelenski, J. M., & Nisbet, E. K. (2012). Happiness and feeling connected: The distinct role of nature relatedness. Environment and Behavior,46(1), 3–23.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512451901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chang, E. C., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & D’Zurilla, T. J. (1997). Optimism and pessimism as partially independent constructs: Relationship to positive and negative affectivity and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences,23(3), 433–440.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)80009-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology,4(3), 219–247.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.4.3.219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dember, W. N., Martin, S. H., Hummer, M. K., Howe, S. R., & Melton, R. S. (1989). The measurement of optimism and pessimism. Current Psychology,8(2), 102–119.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Inoue, A., Kawakami, N., Shimomitsu, T., & Tsutsumi, A. (2014). Development of a short questionnaire to measure an extended set of job demands, job resources, and positive health outcomes: The New Brief Job Stress Questionnaire. Industrial Health,52, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement,1(3), 385–401.  https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Carleton, R. N., Thibodeau, M. A., Teale, M. J. N., Welch, P. G., Abrams, M. P., Robinson, T., et al. (2013). The center for epidemiologic studies depression scale: A review with a theoretical and empirical examination of item content and factor structure. PLoS ONE.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058067.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Huang, V., Beshai, S., Korol, S., & Nicholas Carleton, R. (2017). Configural and scalar invariance of the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale in Egypt and Canada: Differential symptom emphasis across cultures and genders. Psychiatry Research,250, 244–252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.079.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Johns, M. W. (1991). A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: The Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep,14(6), 540–545.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/14.6.540.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods,7(2), 147–177.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology,60, 549–576.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kasser, T., & Sheldon, K. M. (2002). What makes for a merry Christmas? Journal of Happiness Studies,3(August), 313–329.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021516410457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013). The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology,34, 55–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W., Keizer, K., & Perlaviciute, G. (2014). An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology,38, 104–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Venhoeven, L. A., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2013). Explaining the paradox: How pro-environmental behaviour can both thwart and foster well-being. Sustainability,5, 1372–1386.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su5041372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ambrey, C. L., & Daniels, P. (2016). Happiness and footprints: assessing the relationship between individual well-being and carbon footprints. Environment, Development and Sustainability.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9771-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    De Young, R. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues,56(3), 509–526.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Epstein, S., & Meier, P. (1989). Constructive thinking: A broad coping variable with specific components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57(2), 332–350.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.332.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    National Research Council of the National Academies. (2014). Sustainability concepts in decision-making: Tools and approaches for the US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.  https://doi.org/10.17226/18949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Diener, E. (2012). New finding and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist,37, 590–597.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    O’Brien, C. (2008). Sustainable happiness: How happiness studies can contribute to a more sustainable future. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne,49(4), 289–295.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology,88(5), 879–903.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering, Information and SystemsUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
  2. 2.Institute for Information Technology and Human Factors, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)TsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations