Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 28, Issue 9, pp 2553–2563 | Cite as

Cross-cultural selection and validation of instruments to assess patient-reported outcomes in children and adolescents with achondroplasia

  • Janika BloemekeEmail author
  • Rachel Sommer
  • Stefanie Witt
  • Monika Bullinger
  • Clementine Nordon
  • Francisco Javier Badia
  • Felipe Luna González
  • Antonio Leiva-Gea
  • Francisco de Borja Delgado Rufino
  • Fermín Mayoral-Cleries
  • Pablo Romero-Sanchiz
  • Verónica Clamagirand Saiz
  • Raquel Nogueira-Arjona
  • Klaus Mohnike
  • Julia Quitmann
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Achondroplasia, as the most common form of disproportionate short stature, potentially impacts the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functioning of people with this condition. Because there are no psychometrically validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) condition-specific instruments for achondroplasia, this study selected and tested available generic, disease-specific and under development questionnaires for possible use in multinational clinical research.

Methods

A three-step approach was applied. First, a literature review and clinician/expert opinions were used to select relevant PRO questionnaires. Second, focus group discussions, including a group cognitive debriefing for piloting of the questionnaires with children/adolescents with achondroplasia and their parents, were performed in Spain and Germany. Third, a field-test study was conducted to test the psychometric properties of these instruments.

Results

Six questionnaires were identified as potentially relevant in children with achondroplasia. In each country, five focus groups including a cognitive debriefing were conducted, and the results narrowed the possibilities to three instruments as most appropriate to assess HRQOL (the generic PedsQL, the height-specific QoLISSY, and the achondroplasia-specific APLES). Results of the field study indicate the QoLISSY and the PedsQL questionnaires to be most appropriate for use in clinical research at this time.

Conclusion

This selection study is a step forward in assessing the impact of achondroplasia on HRQOL. Of the instruments examined, the QoLISSY and the PedsQL both capture items relevant to children with achondroplasia and have met the psychometric validation criteria needed for use in research. The APLES instrument is a promising tool that should be revisited upon psychometric validation.

Keywords

Achondroplasia HRQOL assessment Psychometric properties Children Parents 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all participating families who contributed to this study, as well as the patient organizations BKMF in Germany and the ALPE Foundation in Spain. Also, we thank the team from BioMarin Pharmadeutical who sponsored the study and Laser Analytica who helped to conduct the study. Furthermore, we thank Dr. Belén Pimentel from FIMABIS for her valuable scientific support.

Funding

This study was sponsored by BioMarin Europe Ltd. PR was supported through an Incorporation of PhD contracts from the University of Málaga and José Castillejo Program (CAS18/00263) from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities. All authors received research funding for the conduct of the study. The authors received no financial support for the development of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interests

All authors received research funding for the conduct of the study. The authors received no financial support for the development of the manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committees in Germany and Spain before start of the study.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Horton, W., Hall, J., & Hecht, J. (2007). Achondroplasia. Lancet, 370, 162–172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mohnike, K., Klingebiel, K., Vaupel, N., & Zabel, B. (2013). Achondroplasie und Hypochondroplasie (2nd ed.). Berlin: ABW Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baujat, G., Legeai-Mallet, L., Finidori, G., Cormier-Daire, V., & Merrer, M. (2008). Achondroplasia. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 22(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Richette, P., Bardin, T., & Stheneur, C. (2008). Achondroplasia: From genotype to phenotype. Joint Bone Spine, 75, 125–130.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ireland, P. J., McGill, J., Zankl, A., Ware, R. S., Pacey, V., Ault, J., et al. (2011). Functional performance in young Australian children with achondoplasia. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 53, 944–950.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoover-Fong, J., Schulze, K. J., McGready, J., Barnes, H., & Schott, C. (2008). Age-appropriate body mass index in children with achondroplasia: interpretation in relation to indexes of height. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 88, 364–371.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gollust, S., Thompson, R., Gooding, H., & Biesecker, B. (2003). Living with achondroplasia in an average-sized world: An assessment of quality of life. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 120(A), 447–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hunter, A. (1998). Some psychosical aspects of nonlethal chondrodysplasias: II. Depression and anxiety. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 78, 9–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bullinger, M. (2002). Assessing health related quality of life in medicine. An overview over concepts, methods and applications in international research. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 20(3–4), 93–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patrick, D., Burke, L., Powers, J., Scott, J., Rock, E., Dawisha, S., et al. (2007). Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value in Health, 10(2), 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cohen, J., & Biesecker, B. (2010). Quality of life in rare genetic conditions: A systematic review of the literature. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 152A, 1136–1156.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brütt, A. L., Sandberg, D. E., Chaplin, J., Wollmann, H., Noeker, M., Koltowska-Haggstrom, M., et al. (2009). Assessment of health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction in children and adolescents with growth hormone deficiency or idiopathic short stature—Part 1: A critical evaluation of available tools. Hormone Research, 72(2), 65–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, S. J., Balce, G. C., Agashe, M. V., Song, S. H., & Song, H. R. (2012). Is bilateral lower limb lengthening appropriate for achondroplasia?: Midterm analysis of the complications and quality of life. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 470(2), 616–621.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Savarirayan, R., & Rimoin, D. L. (2002). The skeletal dysplasias. Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 16, 547–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim, S. J., Agashe, M. V., Song, S. H., Choi, H. J., Lee, H., & Song, H. R. (2012). Comparison between upper and lower limb lengthening in patients with achondroplasia: A retrospective study. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—Series B, 94(B(1)), 128–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ornitz, D. M., & Legeai-Mallet, L. (2017). Achondroplasia: Development, pathogenesis, and therapy. Developmental Dynamics, 246(4), 291–309.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miccoli, M., Bertelloni, S., & Massart, F. (2016). Height outcome of recombinant human grwoth hormone treatment in achondroplasia children: A meta-analysis. Hormone Research in Paediatrics, 86(1), 27–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brod, M., Tesler, L. E., & Christensen, T. L. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices basen on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18, 1263–1278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., et al. (2011). Content validity—Establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: Part 2—assessing respondent understanding. Value Health, 14(8), 978–988.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cheng, K. C., & Clark, A. (2017). Qualitative methods and patient-reported outcomes: Measures development and adaption. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    IBM Corp. (2012). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (version 21.0). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., Boear, M. R., Van der Windt, D., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 34–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    MAXQDA. (1989-2013). Software for qualitative data analysis. Berlin: VERBI Software - Consult - Sozialforschung GmbH.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Petrillo, J., Cano, S. J., McLeod, L., & Coon, C. D. (2015). Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: A comparison of worked examples. Value in Health, 18(1), 25–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Organization W. H. (2007). WHO Growth Reference Program.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Turan, S., Bereket, A., Omar, A., Berber, M., Ozen, A., & Bekiroglu, N. (2005). Upper segment/lower segement ratio and armspan-height differences in healthy Turkish children. Acta Paediatrica, 94, 407–413.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Frederiks, A., van Buuren, S., van Heel, W., Dijkman-Neerincx, R., Verloove-Vanhorick, S., & Wit, J. (2005). Nationwide age references for sitting height, leg length, and sitting height/height ratio, and their diagnostic values for disproportionate growth disorders. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 90, 807–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Del Pino, M., Mejia, R., & Fano, V. (2018). Leg length, sitting height, and body proportions references for achondroplasia: New tools for monitoring growth. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 176, 896–906.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ottenbacher, K. J., Msall, M., Lyon, N., Duffy, L., Ziviani, J., Granger, C., et al. (2000). The WeeFIM instrument: Its utility in detecting change in children with developmental disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(10), 1317–1326.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Dumas, H., Fragala-Pinkham, M., Kramer, J., Ni, P., et al. (2011). Accuracy and precision of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory computer-adaptive tests (PEDI-CAT). Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 53(12), 1100–1106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ravens-Sieberer, U., Herdman, M., Devine, J., Otto, C., Bullinger, M., Rose, M., et al. (2013). The European KIDSCREEN approach to measure quality of life and well-being in children: development, current application, and future advances. Quality of Life Research, 1, 1.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0428-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Varni, J. W., Seid, M., & Rode, C. A. (1999). The PedsQLTM: Measurement model for the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory. Medical Care, 37, 126–139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wille, N., Badia, X., Bonsel, G., Burstrom, K., Cavrini, G., Devlin, N., et al. (2010). Development of the EQ-5D-Y: A child-friendly version of the EQ-5D. Quality of Life Research, 19(6), 875–886.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Daltroy, L., Liang, M., Fossel, A., & Goldberg, M. J. (1998). The POSNA pediatric musculoskeletal functional health questionnaire: Report on reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Pediatric Outcomes Instrument Development Group. Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 18(5), 561–571.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Allen, D., Gortons, G., Oeffinger, D., Tylkowski, C., Tucker, C., & Haley, S. (2008). Analysis of the pediatric outcomes data collection instrument (PODCI) in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory methods. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 28(2), 192–198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rohenkohl, A. C., Bullinger, M., & Quitmann, J. (2015). Quality of life in children, adolescents, and young adults with achondroplasia. Orthopäde, 44(3), 212–218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    The European QoLISSY Group. (2013). Quality of life in short stature youth. The QoLISSY Questionnaire—User’s manual. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sommer, R., Blömeke, J., Dabs, M., Witt, S., Bullinger, M., & Quitmann, J. (2016). An ICF-CY-based approach to assessing self- and observer-reported functioning in young persons with achondroplasia—Development of the pilot version of the Achondroplasia Personal Life Experience Scale (APLES). Disability and Rehabilitation, 16, 1–5.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bloemeke, J., Sommer, R., Witt, S., Dabs, M., Badia, F. J., Bullinger, M., et al. (2018). Piloting and psychometric properties of a patient-reported outcome instrument for young people with achondroplasia based on the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health: The Achondroplasia Personal Life Experience Scale (APLES). Disability and Rehabilitation, 8, 1–11.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shelmerdine, S. C., Brittain, H., Arthurs, O., & Calder, A. (2016). Achondroplasia: Really rhizomelic? American Journal of Medical Genetics, 170(8), 2039–2043.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janika Bloemeke
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rachel Sommer
    • 2
  • Stefanie Witt
    • 1
  • Monika Bullinger
    • 1
  • Clementine Nordon
    • 3
  • Francisco Javier Badia
    • 3
  • Felipe Luna González
    • 4
  • Antonio Leiva-Gea
    • 4
  • Francisco de Borja Delgado Rufino
    • 4
  • Fermín Mayoral-Cleries
    • 5
  • Pablo Romero-Sanchiz
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
  • Verónica Clamagirand Saiz
    • 5
  • Raquel Nogueira-Arjona
    • 7
  • Klaus Mohnike
    • 8
  • Julia Quitmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical PsychologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Institute of Health Care Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP)University Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
  3. 3.LASER AnalyticaParisFrance
  4. 4.Unidad de Cirugía Ortopédica y TraumatologíaHospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria MálagaMálagaSpain
  5. 5.Unidad de Salud MentalHospital Universitario Regional de Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA)MálagaSpain
  6. 6.Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamientos PsicológicosUniversidad de MálagaMálagaSpain
  7. 7.Department of Psychology and NeuroscienceDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  8. 8.University Children’s Clinic, Otto von Geuricke University in MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations