Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 28, Issue 9, pp 2393–2407 | Cite as

Association of the built environments and health-related quality of life in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study

  • Nuan-Ching Huang
  • Cordia Chu
  • Shiann-Far Kung
  • Susan C. HuEmail author
Article

Abstract

Purpose

The relationship between built environments and the quality of life (QoL) of the elderly has gained great attention in recent years. However, most QoL studies have been conducted in western countries; thus, limited research was found in Asia, in which the population density, urban forms, narrow roadways, and land use patterns are more compact and highly mixed in terms of use. Therefore, the purpose of this study was an interdisciplinary analysis of two national datasets, the National Land Use Investigation and the National Health Interview Survey, to explore the relationship between built environments and the health-related quality of life of older adults in Taiwan.

Methods

Eight types of built environments at the township level were calculated, and 1222 nationally representative older adults aged 65 and older were recruited. The outcome variable was health-related QoL as measured using the EQ-5D, including utility score and the EQ-VAS. Statistical methods included descriptive analysis, bivariate analysis, and mixed-effects logistic regression analysis, which were conducted using SAS 9.4 software.

Results

The results showed that a significant relationship exists between cultural and historical facilities and low EQ-VAS; none of the built environments were found to be related to the EQ-5D. Individual factors are the main determinants of the EQ-5D of older adults in Taiwan. Positive relationships were found if older adults were engaging in physical activities and social participation.

Conclusions

We suggest that building a supportive environment in which elderly people could consistently engage in physical activities and social participation is another potential approach that might contribute to active aging.

Keywords

Built environments Quality of life The elderly EQ-5D Multi-level analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We’d like to express our appreciation for the suggestions of the professors, researchers, and members of the Centre for Environment and Population Health, Griffith University.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Grant Number: 106-2917-I-006-011) and a project of active aging from the Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (Grant Number: MOHW106-HPA-M-114-134709, MOHW107-HPA-M-114-144703).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This analysis was based on a dataset from the National Health Interview Survey. However, the interpretation and conclusions contained herein do not represent those of the Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of Institutional Review Board of National Cheng Kung University Hospital, by Human Study Approval (IRB No: B-ER-104-087).

Supplementary material

11136_2019_2199_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (175 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 175 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    WHO. (2015). World report on ageing and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    WHO. (2000). Social development and ageing: Crisis or opportunity?. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    United Nations. (2014). World urbanization prospects. New York: United Nations.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Noreau, L., & Boschen, K. (2010). Intersection of participation and environmental factors: A complex interactive process. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(9), S44–S53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hooyman, N. R., & Kiyak, H. A. (2011). Social gerontology: A multidisciplinary perspective (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    WHO. (1995). The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science and Medicine, 41(10), 1403–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fassio, O., Rollero, C., & De Piccoli, N. (2013). Health, quality of life and population density: A preliminary study on “contextualized” quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 110(2), 479–488.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9940-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferrans, C. E., Zerwic, J. J., Wilbur, J. E., & Larson, J. L. (2005). Conceptual model of health-related quality of life. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37(4), 336–342.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00058.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Revicki, D. A., Kleinman, L., & Cella, D. (2014). A history of health-related quality of life outcomes in psychiatry. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 16(2), 127–135.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kuo, L. M., Tsai, W. C., Chiu, M. J., Tang, L. Y., Lee, H. J., & Shyu, Y. I. L. (2019). Cognitive dysfunction predicts worse health-related quality of life for older stroke survivors: A nationwide population-based survey in Taiwan. Aging & Mental Health, 23(3), 305–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin, S.-I., Chang, K.-C., Lee, H.-C., Yang, Y.-C., & Tsauo, J.-Y. (2015). Problems and fall risk determinants of quality of life in older adults with increased risk of falling. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 15(5), 579–587.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu, S. T., Chang, H. Y., Yao, K. P., Lin, Y. H., & Hurng, B. S. (2015). Validity of EQ-5D in general population of Taiwan: Results of the 2009 National Health Interview and Drug Abuse Survey of Taiwan. Quality of Life Research, 24(10), 2541–2548.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-0978-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clarke, P., & Nieuwenhuijsen, E. R. (2009). Environments for healthy ageing: A critical review. Maturitas, 64(1), 14–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.07.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cerin, E., Nathan, A., van Cauwenberg, J., Barnett, D. W., Barnett, A., et al. (2017). The neighbourhood physical environment and active travel in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14(1), 15.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0471-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oswald, F., Jopp, D., Rott, C., & Wahl, H. W. (2011). Is aging in place a resource for or risk to life satisfaction? Gerontologist, 51(2), 238–250.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq096.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parra, D. C., Gomez, L. F., Sarmiento, O. L., Buchner, D., Brownson, R., Schimd, T., et al. (2010). Perceived and objective neighborhood environment attributes and health related quality of life among the elderly in Bogota, Colombia. Social Science and Medicine, 70(7), 1070–1076.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kent, J. L., & Thompson, S. (2014). The three domains of urban planning for health and well-being. Journal of Planning Literature, 29(3), 239–256.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412214520712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barton, H., Thompson, S., Burgess, S., & Grant, M. (2015). The Routledge handbook of planning for health and well-being: Shaping a sustainable and healthy future. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barton, H. (2016). City of well-being: A radical guide to planning. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barton, H., & Grant, M. (2006). A health map for the local human habitat. The Journal for the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, 126(6), 252–253.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barton, H., & Grant, M. (2013). Urban planning for healthy cities. A review of the progress of the european healthy cities programme. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 90(Suppl 1), 129–141.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    WHO. (2002). Active ageing: A policy framework. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baernholdt, M., Hinton, I., Yan, G., Rose, K., & Mattos, M. (2012). Factors associated with quality of life in older adults in the United States. Quality of Life Research, 21(3), 527–534.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9954-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mielck, A., Vogelmann, M., & Leidl, R. (2014). Health-related quality of life and socioeconomic status: Inequalities among adults with a chronic disease. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12, 58.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Raggi, A., Corso, B., Minicuci, N., Quintas, R., Sattin, D., De Torres, L., et al. (2016). Determinants of quality of life in ageing populations: Results from a cross-sectional study in Finland. Poland and Spain. PLoS ONE, 11(7), e0159293.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159293.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cerin, E., Sit, C. H. P., Zhang, C. J. P., Barnett, A., Cheung, M. M. C., Lai, P.-C., et al. (2016). Neighbourhood environment, physical activity, quality of life and depressive symptoms in Hong Kong older adults: A protocol for an observational study. British Medical Journal Open, 6(1), 010384.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marventano, S., Prieto-Flores, M. E., Sanz-Barbero, B., Martín-García, S., Fernandez-Mayoralas, G., Rojo-Perez, F., et al. (2015). Quality of life in older people with dementia: A multilevel study of individual attributes and residential care center characteristics. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 15(1), 104–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wahl, H. W., & Lang, F. R. (2006). Psychological aging: A contextual view. In S. A. Benjamin, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of models for human aging (pp. 881–895). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Barton, H. (2009). Land use planning and health and well-being. Land Use Policy, 26(1), S115–S123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ng, M. K. (2016). The right to healthy place-making and well-being. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(1), 3–6.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1139227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    WHO. (2009). Zagreb declaration for healthy cities: Health and equity in all local policies. Copenhagen: WHO regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Diez-Roux, A. V. (2000). Multilevel analysis in public health research. Annual Review of Public Health, 21(1), 171–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sugiyama, T., & Thompson, C. W. (2007). Outdoor environments, activity and the well-being of older people: Conceptualising environmental support. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 39(8), 1943–1960.  https://doi.org/10.1068/a38226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sugiyama, T., Thompson, C. W., & Alves, S. (2009). Associations between neighborhood open space attributes and quality of life for older people in Britain. Environment and Behavior, 41(1), 3–21.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507311688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Szanton, S. L., Thorpe, R. J., Boyd, C., Tanner, E. K., Leff, B., Agree, E., et al. (2011). Community aging in place, advancing better living for elders: A bio-behavioral-environmental intervention to improve function and health-related quality of life in disabled older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 59(12), 2314–2320.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03698.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    National Development Council. (2018). Population Projections for Republic of China (Taiwan): 2018–2065. Taipei: National Development Council. Retrieved January 18, 2019, from https://www.ndc.gov.tw/en/cp.aspx?n=2E5DCB04C64512CC.
  37. 37.
    Huang, S. J. (2002). On Taiwan’s level of urbanization. Taiwanese Journal of Sociology, 27, 163–205.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    National Development Council. (2017). Urban and Regional Development Statistics, Republic of China (Chinese version). Retrieved January 18, 2019, from https://ngis.nat.gov.tw/statistic/download.htm.
  39. 39.
    Reenen, M. V., Oppe, M., Boye, K. S., Herdman, M., Kennedy-Martin, M., Kennedy-Martin, T., et al. (2018). EQ-5D-3L User Guide: Basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-3L instrument (version 6) Rotterdam: EuroQol Research Foundation. Retrieved from https://euroqol.org/publications/user-guides.
  40. 40.
    Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care: 1095–1108.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lee, H.-Y., Hung, M.-C., Hu, F.-C., Chang, Y.-Y., Hsieh, C.-L., & Wang, J.-D. (2013). Estimating quality weights for EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 dimensions) health states with the time trade-off method in Taiwan. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 112(11), 699–706.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chang, T.-J., Tarn, Y.-H., Hsieh, C.-L., Liou, W.-S., Shaw, J. W., & Chiou, X. G. (2007). Taiwanese version of the EQ-5D: Validation in a representative sample of the Taiwanese population. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 106(12), 1023–1031.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dalton, A. M., Wareham, N., Griffin, S., & Jones, A. P. (2016). Neighbourhood greenspace is associated with a slower decline in physical activity in older adults: A prospective cohort study. SSM-Population Health, 2, 683–691.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Huang, N. C., Kung, S. F., & Hu, S. C. (2018). The relationship between urbanization, the built environment, and physical activity among older adults in Taiwan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(5), 836.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050836.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ory, M. G., Towne, S. D., Won, J., Forjuoh, S. N., & Lee, C. (2016). Social and environmental predictors of walking among older adults. BMC Geriatrics, 16(1), 155.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hillsdon, M., Coombes, E., Griew, P., & Jones, A. (2015). An assessment of the relevance of the home neighbourhood for understanding environmental influences on physical activity: How far from home do people roam? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1), 100.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0260-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mitchell, R., & Popham, F. (2007). Greenspace, urbanity and health: Relationships in England. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(8), 681–683.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.053553.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Takano, T. (2007). Health and environment in the context of urbanization. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 12(2), 51–55.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02898149.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Cauwenberg, J., Donder, L., Clarys, P., Bourdeaudhuij, I., Buffel, T., & Witte, N. (2014). Relationships between the perceived neighborhood social environment and walking for transportation among older adults. Social Science and Medicine, 104, 23–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.12.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rind, E., Shortt, N., Mitchell, R., Richardson, E. A., & Pearce, J. (2015). Are income-related differences in active travel associated with physical environmental characteristics? A multi-level ecological approach. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1), 73.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0217-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ene, M., Leighton, E. A., Blue, G. L., & Bell, B. A. (2015). Multilevel models for categorical data using SAS® PROC GLIMMIX: the basics. In SAS Global Forum 2015 Proceedings, 3430-2015.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis, a global perspective (Vol. 7). New Jersey: Pearson.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bruce, J. M., Echemendia, R. J., Meeuwisse, W., Hutchison, M. G., Aubry, M., & Comper, P. (2018). Development of a risk prediction model among professional hockey players with visible signs of concussion. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 52(17), 1143–1148.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-097091.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Fernández, E., Smieja, M., Walter, S. D., & Loeb, M. (2016). A predictive model to differentiate dengue from other febrile illness. BMC Infectious Diseases, 16(1), 694.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-2024-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hörisch, J., Kollat, J., & Brieger, S. A. (2017). What influences environmental entrepreneurship? A multilevel analysis of the determinants of entrepreneurs’ environmental orientation. Small Business Economics, 48(1), 47–69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9765-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Feng, Y., Parkin, D., & Devlin, N. J. (2014). Assessing the performance of the EQ-VAS in the NHS PROMs programme. Quality of Life Research, 23(3), 977–989.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0537-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Whynes, D. K., & TOMBOLA Group. (2008). Correspondence between EQ-5D health state classifications and EQ VAS scores. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 6(1), 94.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Pasanen, T. P., Tyrväinen, L., & Korpela, K. M. (2014). The relationship between perceived health and physical activity indoors, outdoors in built environments, and outdoors in nature. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 6(3), 324–346.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Wen, M., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2006). Objective and perceived neighborhood environment, individual SES and psychosocial factors, and self-rated health: An analysis of older adults in Cook County. Illinois. Social Science & Medicine, 63(10), 2575–2590.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.06.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Fu, Y. Y., Guo, Y., Bai, X., & Chui, E. W. T. (2017). Factors associated with older people’s long-term care needs: A case study adopting the expanded version of the Anderson Model in China. BMC Geriatrics, 17(1), 38.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0436-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    The Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2013). Senior Citizen Condition Survey. Retrieved January 18, 2019, from https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/cp-1767-3586-113.html.
  62. 62.
    Lin, Y.-Y., & Huang, C.-S. (2016). Aging in Taiwan: Building a society for active aging and aging in place. Gerontologist, 56(2), 176–183.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv107.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ministry of the Interior. (2015). Urban Planning Law. Retrieved January 18, 2019, from https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0070001.
  64. 64.
    Insch, A., & Florek, M. (2010). Place satisfaction of city residents: Findings and implications for city branding. In G. Ashworth & M. Kavaratzis (Eds.), Towards effective place brand management: Branding European Cities and Regions (pp. 191–204). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kim, K., Uysal, M., & Sirgy, M. J. (2013). How does tourism in a community impact the quality of life of community residents? Tourism Management, 36, 527–540.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Marcouiller, D. W. (1997). Toward integrative tourism planning in rural America. Journal of Planning Literature, 11(3), 337–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Yu, C. P., Cole, S. T., & Chancellor, C. (2016). Assessing community quality of life in the context of tourism development. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 11(1), 147–162.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-014-9359-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nuan-Ching Huang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Cordia Chu
    • 3
  • Shiann-Far Kung
    • 1
    • 2
  • Susan C. Hu
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Healthy Cities Research Center, Research and Services HeadquartersNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Urban Planning, College of Planning and DesignNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
  3. 3.Centre for Environment and Population Health, School of MedicineGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Public Health, College of MedicineNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations