Psychometric properties and correlates of a brief scale measuring the psychological construct mattering to others in a sample of women recovering from breast cancer
Mattering to others, or perceiving one is a significant part of the social world, may be important to breast cancer survivors’ quality of life. This study examines the reliability and validity of the 5-item general mattering scale (GMS) to assess mattering in breast cancer survivors.
A secondary analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed on data from an intervention study with breast cancer survivors that included the GMS and other psychological measures.
The unidimensional representation of the GMS was consistent with the data (χ2 = 8.102; df = 4; p = .088). The scale was highly reliable as indicated by McDonald’s omega of .84. The scale was significantly correlated with all psychological measures in the predicted direction except anxiety. After controlling for social support, the scale was significantly, positively correlated with functional quality of life, self-esteem, positive affect, and having meaning in life. Mattering was significantly, negatively correlated with searching for meaning. Significantly higher level of mattering was found among married participants and among women who had not obtained psychological therapy.
The 5-item GMS is a practical, reliable, and valid tool the measuring mattering to others among breast cancer survivors.
KeywordsBreast cancer Quality of life Mattering Meaning in life
This work was supported in part by NIH Grant R21CA15881 (SJL).
This study was partially funded by NIH Grant R21CA15887.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Samantha Davis declares that she has no conflict of interest. Stephen Lepore received funding to support the study, NIH Grant R21CA15887.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.American Cancer Society. (2017). Cancer facts & Figs. 2017. Atlanta, GA. Retrieved December 24, 2017, from https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2017/cancer-facts-and-figures-2017.pdf.
- 5.Zabora, J., BrintzenhofeSzoc, K., Curbow, B., Hooker, C., & Piantadosi, S. (2001). The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psycho-Oncology, 10(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1%3C19::AID-PON501%3E3.0.CO;2-6 Google Scholar
- 11.Kernan, W. D., & Lepore, S. J. (2009). Searching for and making meaning after breast cancer: Prevalence, patterns, and negative affect. Social Science & Medicine, 68(6), 1176–1182.Google Scholar
- 13.Moadel, A., Morgan, C., Fatone, A., Grennan, J., Carter, J., Laruffa, G., & Dutcher, J. (1999). Seeking meaning and hope: Self-reported spiritual and existential needs among an ethnically-diverse cancer patient population. Psycho-Oncology, 8(5), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199909/10)8:5%3C378::AID-PON406%3E3.0.CO;2-A Google Scholar
- 17.Cordella, M., & Poiana, A. (2014). Behavioural oncology: Psychological, communicative, and social dimensions. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9605-2_5%23citeas.Google Scholar
- 20.Rosenberg, M., & McCullough, B. C. (1979). Mattering: Inferred significance and mental health among adolescents. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association. Boston.Google Scholar
- 28.Feuerstein, M. (2007). Handbook of cancer survivorship. Boston: Springer US.Google Scholar
- 29.Marcus, F. M. (1991). Mattering: Its measurement and theoretical significance for social psychology. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Sociological Association. Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar
- 30.Connolly, K. M., & Myers, J. E. (2003). Wellness and mattering: The role of holistic factors in job satisfaction. Journal of Employment Counseling, 40(4), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1920.2003.tb00866.x.Google Scholar
- 32.Joiner, T. E., Van Orden, K. A., Witte, T. K., Selby, E. A., Ribeiro, J. D., Lewis, R., & Rudd, M. D. (2009). Main predictions of the interpersonal–psychological theory of suicidal behavior: Empirical tests in two samples of young adults. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118(3), 634–646. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016500.Google Scholar
- 38.Bloom, J. R., Stewart, S. L., Johnston, M., Banks, P., & Fobair, P. (2001). Sources of support and the physical and mental well-being of young women with breast cancer. Social Science & Medicine, 53(11), 1513–1524.Google Scholar
- 39.Kamen, C., Mustian, K. M., Heckler, C., Janelsins, M. C., Peppone, L. J., Mohile, S., & Morrow, G. R. (2015). The association between partner support and psychological distress among prostate cancer survivors in a nationwide study. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 9(3), 492–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0425-3.Google Scholar
- 41.Durá-Ferrandis, E., Mandelblatt, J. S., Clapp, J., Luta, G., Faul, L., Kimmick, G., & Hurria, A. (2017). Personality, coping, and social support as predictors of long-term quality-of-life trajectories in older breast cancer survivors: CALGB protocol 369901 (Alliance). Psycho-Oncology, 26(11), 1914–1921. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4404.Google Scholar
- 43.Lepore, S. J., Buzaglo, J. S., Lieberman, M. A., Golant, M., Greener, J. R., & Davey, A. (2014). Comparing standard versus prosocial internet support groups for patients with breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial of the helper therapy principle. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32(36), 4081–4086. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.57.0093.Google Scholar
- 44.Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370.Google Scholar
- 45.Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1983). The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stess. Advances in Personal Relationships, 1(1), 37–67.Google Scholar
- 47.Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.Google Scholar
- 48.Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2004). The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology/The British Psychological Society, 43(Pt 3), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1348/0144665031752934.Google Scholar
- 50.Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- 52.Brady, M. J., Cella, D. F., Mo, F., Bonomi, A. E., Tulsky, D. S., Lloyd, S. R., … Shiomoto, G. (1997). Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 15(3), 974–986. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19188.8.131.524.Google Scholar
- 57.IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS statistics for windows. 2017. Armonk: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
- 58.Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide. Statistical analysis with latent variables user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- 59.Dumenci, L. (2000). Multitrait-multimethod analysis. In E. A. H. Tinsley & S. Brown (Eds.) (Ed.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 583–611). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- 60.Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
- 63.Lin, Y.-C., Strong, C., Tsai, M.-C., Lin, C.-Y., & Fung, X. C. C. (2018). Validating sizing them up: A parent-proxy weight-related quality-of-life measure, with community-based children. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 18(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.10.001.Google Scholar
- 64.Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from http://www.utstat.toronto.edu/~brunner/oldclass/378f16/readings/CohenPower.pdf.
- 65.O’Connor, A. P., Wicker, C. A., & Germino, B. B. (1990). Understanding the cancer patient’s search for meaning. Cancer Nursing, 13(3), 167–175.Google Scholar