Communication changes with laryngectomy and impact on quality of life: a review
Patients with throat cancer at later stages often undergo total laryngectomy, a procedure that removes the larynx (voice box) and directly impacts the patient’s ability to produce natural voice and communication. This narrative review aimed to explore how changes to communication following laryngectomy may impact quality of life (QoL) for patients.
Literature searches were conducted using CINAHL, MEDLINE and PsychInfo databases for studies published between 2007 and 2018. The search terms (and derivatives) of laryngectomy AND communication AND quality of life were used. A synthesis and appraisal of the studies was conducted.
Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The two main themes identified relating to changes in communication and impact on QoL were changes in communication competency (immediate changes and communication option used) and adaptation to change (e.g. self-related factors and relationships with others). Regardless of the type of communication option used, participants in all studies reported negative changes in their communication competency and QoL post-laryngectomy. Voice-related factors and aesthetics of the communication option used were noted to influence self-ratings of QoL for the participants, rather than how well others understood them. Participants using tracheoesophageal speech (TES) consistently showed the highest self-reported QoL across the majority of studies. A model incorporating the findings from this review has been proposed which outlines how changes in communication post-laryngectomy may lead to an impact on QoL. Here, the factors of changes in communication competency, self-perception and social engagement impact each other and are also influenced by adaptation to change.
This review has highlighted the complex nature of changes faced by patients following laryngectomy in relation to communication and QoL. The model linking communication changes to QoL may become a useful tool for researchers and clinicians in supporting the management of patients post-laryngectomy.
KeywordsQuality of life Communication Laryngectomy Voice Review
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
- 1.Fogle, P. T. (2013). Essentials of communication sciences & disorders. Clifton Park: Delmar, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
- 2.World Health Organisation. (1997). Programme on mental health: WHOQOL measuring quality of life. http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/en/68.pdf. Accessed 10 January 2018.
- 5.Balm, A. J. M. (2014). Laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: Intervention approaches. In E. Ward & C. As-Brooks (Eds.), Head and neck cancer: Treatment, rehabilitation, and outcomes (2nd ed., pp. 123–143). San Diego: Plural Publishing.Google Scholar
- 8.Searl, J. P., & Reeves, S. I. (2014). Nonsurgical voice restoration following total laryngectomy. In E. Ward & C. As-Brooks (Eds.), Head and neck cancer: Treatment, rehabilitation, and outcomes (2nd ed., pp. 193–227). San Diego: Plural Publishing.Google Scholar
- 10.Chen, H.-C., Mardini, S., & Yang, C.-W. (2006). Voice reconstruction using the free ileocolon flap versus the pneumatic artificial larynx: A comparison of patients’ preference and experience following laryngectomy. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2006.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.CASP Checklists. Retrieved January 2, 2018 from https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/.
- 26.Chaves, A., de Araújo Pernanbuco, L., Balata, P., Santos, V., Lima, L., Souza, S., et al. (2012). Limits on quality of life in communication after total laryngectomy. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology. https://doi.org/10.7162/S1809-97772012000400009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 28.Kelly, L. E. (2014). Radiation and chemotherapy. In E. Ward & C. As-Brooks (Eds.), Head and neck cancer: Treatment, rehabilitation, and outcomes (2nd ed., pp. 57–86). San Diego: Plural Publishing.Google Scholar
- 29.The WHOQOL Group. (1994). The development of the World Health Organization quality of life assessment instrument (the WHOQOL). In J. Orley & W. Kuyken (Eds.), Quality of life assessment: International perspectives. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar