Psychometric properties of a modified version of the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P) in a clinical sample of children with aggressive behavior
To evaluate the psychometric properties of a German modification of the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale—Parent Report for children with aggressive and oppositional behavior problems (WFIRS-P for ODD/CD).
Data were collected from a clinical sample of children (6–12 years; 96% boys) with oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and conduct disorder (CD) (N = 219). The WFIRS-P conceptual framework was evaluated using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Reliability was estimated using internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and omega statistics. Validity was assessed through correlations between WFIRS-P for ODD/CD domain scores and parent-rated scales on symptoms of ODD, CD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a broad range of other behavioral and emotional problems, and scales on health-related quality of life and family burden.
CFA of the WFIRS-P for ODD/CD revealed that a bifactor model, with a general factor accounting for common variance (ωH = 0.23–0.48) and independent specific group factors accounting for additional variance in item scores (ωS = 0.37–0.60), best fits the data. Thus, CFA confirmed the theoretical assumption of a general construct of impairment (total scale) and additional specific impairments (subscales, e.g., family, social activities). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient exceeded 0.70 for all subscales. Omega statistics showed that both the general construct and specific factors accounted for item variance. As expected, correlations with symptoms scales for ODD/CD and ADHD were low to moderate.
The use of the parent-rated WFIRS for ODD/CD in identifying ODD- and CD-related impairment in children is psychometrically supported. The scale can be employed to assess functional impairment in children with aggressive behavior problems.
KeywordsOppositional defiant disorder Children Functional impairment Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale Psychometric properties
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents.
- 9.Kutash, K., Lynn, N., & Burns, B. (2008). Child and adolescent measures of functional status. In A. Rush, M. First, D. Blacker (Eds.), Handbook of psychiatric measures (pp. 343–371). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
- 16.Canadian Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Resource Alliance (CADDRA) (2011). Canadian ADHD Practice Guidelines (CAP-Guidelines). Retrieved 5 Dec 2017, from http://caddra.ca/pdfs/caddraGuidelines2011.pdf.
- 17.Dose, C., Hautmann, C., & Doepfner, M. (2016). Functional impairment in children with externalizing behavior problems: Psychometric properties of the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale—parent report in a German clinical sample. Journal of Attention Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054716661234. (Advance online publication).Google Scholar
- 18.Goertz-Dorten, A., Benesch, C., Hautmann, C., Berk-Pawlitzek, E., Faber, M., Lindenschmidt, T. … Doepfner, M. (2017). Efficacy of an individualized social competence training for children with oppositional defiant disorders/conduct disorders. Psychotherapy Research, 27, 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1094587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Goertz-Dorten, A., Benesch, C., Berk-Pawlitzek, E., Faber, M., Hautmann, C., Hellmich, M., … Doepfner, M. (2017). Efficacy of an individualized social competence training for children with oppositional defiant disorders/conduct disorders—A randomized controlled trial with an active control group. Psychotherapy Research, 27(3), 326–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Katzmann, J., Goertz-Dorten, A., Hautmann, C., & Doepfner, M. (2018) Social skills training and play group intervention for children with oppositional defiant disorders/conduct disorder: Mediating mechanisms in a head-to-head comparison. Psychotherapy Research, https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2018.1425559.Google Scholar
- 21.Goertz-Dorten, A., Katzmann, J., Groth, M., Detering, K., Hellmann, A., Lutz, L., … Doepfner, M. Efficacy of an individualized computer-based social competence training for children with Oppositional Defiant Disorders/Conduct Disorders. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- 23.World Health Organization. (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
- 24.Doepfner, M., Goertz-Dorten, A., & Lehmkuhl, G. (2008). Diagnostik-System für psychische Stoerungen nach ICD-10 und DMS-IV für Kinder und Jugendliche—II. [Diagnostic system for mental disorders in childhood and adolescence—II]. Berne: Huber.Google Scholar
- 25.Gajria, K., Kosinski, M., Sikirica, V., Huss, M., Livote, E., Reilly, K., … Erder, M. H. (2015). Psychometric validation of the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report Form in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Qian, Y., Du, Q.-X., Qu, S., & Wang, Y. F. (2011). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Weiss Functional Impairment Scale-Parent Form for school age children. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 25, 767–771.Google Scholar
- 28.Doepfner, M., Plueck, J., & Kinnen, C., für die Arbeitsgruppe Deutsche Child Behavior Checklist (2014). CBCL Handbuch-Schulalter. Manual zum Elternfragebogen über das Verhalten von Kindern und Jugendlichen, (CBCL 4-18), zum Lehrerfragebogen über das Verhalten von Kindern und Jugendlichen (TRF) und zum Fragebogen für Jugendliche (YSR). [Manual of the child behavior checklist (CBCL), the youth self-report and teacher’s report form]. Goettingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- 32.Ravens-Sieberer, U., Morfeld, M., Stein, R., Reissmann, C., Bullinger, M., & Thyen, U. (2001). Der Familien-Belastungs-Fragebogen (FaBel-Fragebogen)—Testung und Validierung der deutschen Version der Impact on Family Scale bei Familien mit behinderten Kindern. [German Validation of the Impact on Family Scale for children with disabilities]. Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie, 51, 384–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- 35.Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- 37.Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Mueller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74.Google Scholar