Quality of Life Research

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 411–420 | Cite as

Prioritizing positivity across the adult lifespan: initial evidence for differential associations with positive and negative emotions

  • Hadassah Littman-OvadiaEmail author
  • Pninit Russo-Netzer



Prioritizing positivity (PP) has been presented as an effective mechanism to increase positive emotions and reduce negative emotions. The current study sought to explore the role of age as a moderator and identify selected situations facilitating the likelihood of routinely experiencing positive and negative emotions.


This mixed methods study consisted of 604 adults between 17 and 87 years who completed prioritizing positivity (PP) scale, positive and negative affect scale (PANAS), and demographic data. Aside from the study questionnaires, a subsample of 223 participants was presented with two open questions. 1037 responses to these two questions comprised the data for content analysis.


PP was found to be associated with increasing positive emotions in old adulthood, but not in young adulthood, and more with decreasing negative emotions in young adulthood than in old adulthood. Content analysis revealed that interpersonal interaction is critical in both increasing positive and reducing negative emotions, across age groups. However, young adults were more likely to prioritize pleasurable activities as triggers of positive emotions. Older adults focused on avoiding unfulfilling situations, due to the negative emotions that they trigger.


Integrating both qualitative and quantitative findings elucidates the role of daily routine situations and activities in the management of positive and negative emotions across the lifespan. PP was shown to be of significant emotional value for younger as well as for older adults, though for different reasons. For younger adults, PP serves as a potential ’buffer’ to balance negative emotions related to daily stresses and hassles characterizing this life stage, whereas for older adults it serves as a mechanism to boost life’s little pleasures on a daily basis based on the acknowledgment of one’s limited time ahead.


Prioritizing positivity Positive affect Negative affect Lifespan Situations selection Emotion-regulation strategy Well-being Adulthood 



This paper is dedicated to the memory of Ron Monachem, who was the first author’s research assistant and was of great assistance in the data collection. He was sadly killed in a motorcycle accident in July 2016.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Catalino, L. I., Algoe, S. B., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2014). Prioritizing positivity: An effective approach to pursuing happiness? Emotion, 14, 1155–1161. Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ford, B. Q., Shallcross, A. J., Mauss, I. B., Floerke, V. A., & Gruber, J. (2014). If you seek it, it won’t come: Valuing happiness is associated with symptoms and diagnosis of depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 33, 890–905. Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mauss, I. B., Savino, N. S., Anderson, C. L., Weisbuch, M., Tamir, M., & Laudenslager, M. L. (2012). The pursuit of happiness can be lonely. Emotion, 12, 908–912. Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mauss, I. B., Tamir, M., Anderson, C. L., & Savino, N. S. (2011). Can seeking happiness make people unhappy? Paradoxical effects of valuing happiness. Emotion, 11, 807–815. Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schooler, J. W., Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). The explicit pursuit and assessment of happiness can be self-defeating (Study 1). In J. Carrillo & I. Brocas (Eds.), Psychology and economics (pp. 41–72). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Datu, J. A. D., & King, R. B. (2016). Prioritizing positivity optimizes positive emotions and life satisfaction: A three-wave longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 111–114. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226. Scholar
  8. 8.
    Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Charles, S. T., Reynolds, C. A., & Gatz, M. (2001). Age-related differences and change in positive and negative affect over 23 years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 136–151. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carstensen, L. L., Turan, B., Scheibe, S., Ram, N., Ersner-Hershfield, H., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., … Nesselroade, J. R. (2011). Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychological Aging, 26(1), 21–33. Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gross, J. J., Carstensen, L. L., Pasupathi, M., Tsai, J., Skorpen, C. G., & Hsu, A. Y. C. (1997). Emotion and aging: Experience, expression, and control. Psychology and Aging, 12, 590–599. Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mroczek, D. K., & Kolarz, C. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1333–1349. Scholar
  13. 13.
    Steptoe, A., Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2015). Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. The Lancet, 385, 640–648. Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lawton, M. P., Kleban, M. H., & Dean, J. (1993). Affect and age: Cross-sectional comparisons of structure and prevalence. Psychology and Aging, 8, 165–175. Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081. Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913–1915. Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181. Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2007). Handbook of emotion regulation. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Central Bureau of Statistics (2015). Statistical abstract of Israel 2015: Annual data—2. Population. Resource document. Retrieved from Accessed 1 Sept 2016.
  20. 20.
    Russo-Netzer, P. (in press). Prioritizing meaning as a pathway to meaning in life and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect—The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anaby, D., Jarus, T., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010). Psychometric evaluation of the Hebrew language version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Social Indicators Research, 96, 267–274. Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727.‏. Scholar
  28. 28.
    Seligman, M. E. P. (2012). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and wellbeing. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brandtstädter, J., Wentura, D., & Rothermund, K. (1999). Intentional self-development through adulthood and later life: Tenacious pursuit and flexible adjustment of goals. In J. Brandtstädter & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Action and self-development: Theory and research through the life span (pp. 373–400). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jung, C. G. (1964). Man and his symbols. New York: Laurel.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wink, P. (1999). Addressing end-of-life issues: Spirituality and inner life. Generations, 23(1), 75–81.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bell, A., & Jones, K. (2013). The impossibility of separating age, period and cohort effects. Social Science and Medicine, 93, 163–165. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioral Sciences and PsychologyAriel UniversityArielIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Counseling and Human DevelopmentUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations