Advertisement

Validation and measurement invariance of the multidimensional qualitative job insecurity scale

  • Margherita Brondino
  • Andrea BazzoliEmail author
  • Tinne Vander Elst
  • Hans De Witte
  • Margherita Pasini
Article
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

This contribution introduces the Multidimensional Qualitative Job Insecurity Scale (MQJIS). Drawing from the qualitative job insecurity literature and addressing some of other scales’ limitations, a multidimensional model is proposed and investigated by means of confirmatory factor analysis and multilevel confirmatory factor analysis. Study 1 aims to explore the psychometric properties and factorial structure of MQJIS in an Italian sample of blue-collar workers (N = 583), showing that a model with one higher-order factor (i.e., qualitative job insecurity) and four dimensions (i.e., social relationships, employment conditions, working conditions, and work content) shows a good fit to the data and good reliability indices. Study 2 aims to investigate MQJIS measurement invariance across several groups, based on country of origin, age, and gender. Results on a sample of Belgian and Italian workers (N = 710) show that MQJIS met the criteria for uniqueness invariance across genders and scalar invariance across countries and age groups. Significance, implications, and future directions stemming from the initial validation and the confirmed measurement invariance of this scale are discussed.

Keywords

Qualitative job insecurity Multidimensional scale Measurement invariance Validation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ashford, S.J., Lee, C., Bobko, P.: Content, causes, and consequences of job insecurity: a theory-based measure and substantive test. Acad. Manag. J. 32(4), 803–829 (1989).  https://doi.org/10.2307/256569 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asparouhov, T., Muthèn, B.O.: Exploratory structural equation modeling. Struct. Equ. Model. 16(3), 397–438 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentler, P.M.: Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 107(2), 238–246 (1990).  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Byrne, B.M., van de Vijver, F.J.R.: Testing for measurement and structural equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: addressing the issue of nonequivalence. Int. J. Test. 10(2), 107–132 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1080/15305051003637306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, F.F.: Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Struct. Equ. Model. 14(3), 464–504 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng, G.H.-L., Chan, D.K.-S.: Who suffers more from job insecurity? A meta-analytic review. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 57(2), 272–303 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00312.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chirumbolo, A., Urbini, F., Callea, A., Talamo, A.: The impact of qualitative job insecurity on identification with the organization: the moderating role of overall organizational justice. Swiss J. Psychol. 76(3), 117–123 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Curran, P.J., West, S.G., Finch, J.F.: The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factory analysis. Psychol. Methods 1(1), 16–29 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Witte, H., De Cuyper, N., Handaja, Y., Sverke, M., Näswall, K., Hellgren, J.: Associations between quantitative and qualitative job insecurity and well-being: a test in Belgian banks. Int. Stud. Manag. Org. 40(1), 40–56 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. Dyer, N.G., Hanges, P.J., Hall, R.J.: Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leadersh. Q. 16(1), 149–167 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eurofound (2018). Measuring Varieties of Industrial Relations in Europe: A Quantitative Analysis. Retrieved from: www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef18033en.pdf. Accessed 3 Jan 2020.
  12. Evans, M.G.: The problem of analyzing multiplicative composites: interactions revisited. Am. Psychol. 46(1), 6–15 (1991).  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.1.6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fischmann, G., De Witte, H., Sulea, C., Iliescu, D.: Qualitative job insecurity and in-role performance: a bidirectional longitudinal relationship? Eur. J. Work Org. Psychol. 27(5), 603–615 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1504769 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Handaja, Y., De Witte, H.: Kwantitatieve en kwalitatieve baanonzekerheid: samenhangen met arbeidstevredenheid en psychisch welzijn [Quantitative and qualitative job insecurity: Associations with job satisfaction and mental well-being]. Gedrag Organ. 20(2), 137–159 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. Hellgren, J., Sverke, M., Isaksson, K.: A two-dimensional approach to job insecurity: consequences for employee attitudes and well-being. Eur. J. Work Org. Psychol. 8, 179–195 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu, L.-T., Bentler, P.M.: Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 6(1), 1–55 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hu, S.-M., Zuo, B.: Impact of job insecurity on job pressure, job satisfaction and performance. Chin. J. Clin. Psychol. 15(2), 142–145 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. Kline, P.: A Handbook of Test Construction. Routledge, London (2015)Google Scholar
  19. Lamberts, M., Szeker, L., Vandekerckhove, S., Van Gyes, G., Van Hootengem, G., Vereycken, Y., Vendramin, P.: Jobkwaliteit in Belgie in 2015: Analyses aan de hand van de European Working Conditions Survey EWCS 2015 (Eurofound). HIVA KU Leuven, Leuven (2016)Google Scholar
  20. Le Blanc, P., De Jonge, J., Schaufeli, W.B.: Job stress and health. In: Chmiel, N. (ed.) Introduction to Work and Organizational Psychology: A European Perspective, pp. 148–177. Blackwell Publishing, Malden (2000)Google Scholar
  21. Mellenbergh, G.J.: Item bias and item response theory. Int. J. Educ. Res. 13(2), 127–143 (1989).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90002-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Milfont, T.L., Fischer, R.: Testing measurement invariance across groups: applications in cross-cultural research. Int. J. Psychol. Res. 3(1), 111–121 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Muthèn, B.O.: Analysis of longitudinal data using latent variable models with varying parameters. In: Collins, L., Horn, J. (eds.) Best Methods for the Analysis of Change. Recent Advances, Unanswered Questions, Future Directions, pp. 1–17. American Psychological Association, Washington (1991)Google Scholar
  24. Muthèn, B.O.: Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociol. Methods Res. 22(3), 376–398 (1994).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124194022003006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Probst, T.M.: Development and validation of the job insecurity index and the job security satisfaction scale: a classical test theory and IRT approach. J. Occup. Org. Psychol. 76(4), 451–467 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1348/096317903322591587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shannon, H.S., Norman, G.R.: Deriving the factor structure of safety climate scales. Saf. Sci. 47, 327–329 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shoss, M.K.: Job insecurity: An integrative review and agenda for future research. J. Manag. 43(6), 1911–1939 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317691574 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stynen, D., Forrier, A., Sels, L., De Witte, H.: The relationship between qualitative job insecurity and OCB: Differences across age groups. Econ. Ind. Democr. 36(3), 383–405 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X13510326 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sverke, M., Hellgren, J.: The nature of job insecurity: understanding employment uncertainty on the brink of a new millennium. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 51(1), 23–42 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.0077z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tucker, L.R., Lewis, C.: A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38(1), 1–10 (1973).  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Urbanaviciute, I., Lazauskaite-Zabielske, J., Vander Elst, T., Bagdziuniene, D., De Witte, H.: Qualitative job insecurity, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment: the mediating role of control perceptions. Psihilogia Resurselor Umane 13, 217–231 (2015)Google Scholar
  32. Van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., Hox, J.: A checklist for testing measurement invariance. Eur. J. Dev. Psychol. 9(4), 486–492 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van den Broeck, A., Sulea, C., Vander Elst, T., Fischmann, G., Iliescu, D., De Witte, H.: The mediating role of psychological needs in the relation between qualitative job insecurity and counterproductive work behavior. Career Dev. Int. 19(5), 526–547 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-05-2013-0063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vandenberg, R.J., Lance, C.E.: A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Org. Res. Methods 3(1), 4–70 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vander Elst, T., De Witte, H., De Cuyper, N.: The job insecurity scale: a psychometric evaluation across five European countries. Eur. J. Work Org. Psychol. 23(3), 364–380 (2014a).  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.745989 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vander Elst, T., Richter, A., Sverke, M., Näswall, K., De Cuyper, N., De Witte, H.: Threat of losing valued job features: the role of perceived control in mediating the effect of qualitative job insecurity on job strain and psychological withdrawal. Work Stress 28(2), 143–164 (2014b).  https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2014.89965 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Visser, J.: The quality of industrial relations and the Lisbon strategy. In: Commission, E. (ed.) Industrial Relations in Europe 2008, pp. 45–72. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human SciencesUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyWashington State University VancouverVancouverUSA
  3. 3.Knowledge, Information and Research Center, IDEWEExternal Service for Prevention and Protection at WorkLeuvenBelgium
  4. 4.Research Group Work, Organisational, and Personnel Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational SciencesKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  5. 5.Optentia Research Focus AreaNorth-West UniversityVanderbijlparkSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations