Advertisement

Using old results to produce new solutions in age–period–cohort multiple classification models

  • Robert M. O’BrienEmail author
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

The best fitting solutions to the age–period–cohort multiple classification (APCMC) model lie on a line of solutions in multidimensional solution space. This means that there are an infinite number of best fitting solutions to an APCMC model. This paper uses that fact to show how researchers can find new solutions based on previously published solutions that are more consistent with theory and/or substantive research in a specific area of research. These results can refine and/or challenge the published research. Finally, the paper demonstrates how results from a previous study can be used to derive some important estimable functions that are true for any just identifying constrained solution to an APCMC model.

Keywords

Age–period–cohort models Bounds for age–period cohort models Estimable functions for age–period–cohort models Producing new results from old results for age–period–cohort models 

Notes

Supplementary material

11135_2019_945_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (14 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 13 kb)

References

  1. Alwin, D.F.: Family origins and cohort differences in verbal ability. Am. Sociol. Rev. 56, 625–638 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alwin, D.F., McCammon, R.J.: Aging versus cohort interpretations of intercohort differences in GSS vocabulary scores. Am. Sociol. Rev. 64, 272–286 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, A., Jones, K.: Bayesian informative priors with Yang and Land’s hierarchical age–period–cohort model. Qual. Quant. 49, 255–266 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clayton, D., Schifflers, E.: Models for temporal variations in cancer rates. II: age–period–cohort models. Stat. Med. 6, 469–481 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fosse, E., Winship, C.: Nonparametric bounds of age–period–cohort effects. Downloaded on 4/10/18 from: https://q-aps.princeton.edu.sitesaps.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/q-aps/files/apcbounds_draft.pdf (2016)
  6. Glenn, N.D.: Further discussion of the evidence for an intercohort decline in educational adjusted vocabulary. Am. Sociol. Rev. 64, 267–271 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holford, T.R.: The estimation of age, period and cohort effects for vital rates. Biometrics 39, 311–324 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kupper, L.L., Janis, J.M., Salama, I.A., Yoshizawa, C.N., Greenberg, B.G.: Age–period–cohort analysis: an illustration of the problems in assessing interaction in one observation per cell data. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 12, 2779–2807 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Luo, L., Hodges, J., Winship, C., Powers, D.A.: The sensitivity of the intrinsic estimator to coding schemes: a comment on Yang, Schulhofer-Wohl, Fu, and Land. Am. J. Sociol. 122, 930–961 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. O’Brien, R.M.: Constrained estimators and age–period–cohort models. Sociol. Methods Res. 40, 419–452 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. O’Brien, R.M.: Age–Period–Cohort Models: Approaches and Analysis with Aggregate Data. Chapman & Hall, New York (2014a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. O’Brien, R.M.: Estimable functions in age–period–cohort models: a unified approach. Qual. Quant. 48, 457–474 (2014b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. O’Brien, R.M.: Homicide arrest rate trends in the United States: the contribution of periods and cohorts (1965–2015). J. Quant. Criminol. 35, 211–236 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pelzer, B., Te Grotenhuis, M., Eisinga, R., Schmidt-Catran, A.W.: The non-uniqueness property of the intrinsic estimator in APC models. Demography 52, 315–327 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rodgers, W.L.: Estimable functions of age, period, and cohort effects. Am. Sociol. Rev. 47, 774–787 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schwadel, P.: Age, period, and cohort effects on religious activities and beliefs. Soc. Sci. Res. 40, 181–192 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wilson, J.A., Gove, W.R.: The intercohort decline in verbal ability: does it exist? Am. Sociol. Rev. 64, 253–266 (1999a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wilson, J.A., Gove, W.R.: The age–period–cohort conundrum and verbal ability: empirical relationships and their interpretation (Reply to Glenn and to Alwin & McCammon). Am. Sociol. Rev. 64, 287–302 (1999b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yang, Y., Schulhofer-Wohl, S., Fu, W.J., Land, K.C.: The intrinsic estimator for age–period–cohort analysis: what it is and how to use it. Am. J. Sociol. 113, 1697–1736 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of OregonCastle ValleyUSA

Personalised recommendations