Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 53, Issue 4, pp 1941–1958 | Cite as

Does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Chinese listed companies in heavily polluting industries

  • Feng Shen
  • Yunwen Ma
  • Run Wang
  • Ningning Pan
  • Zhiyi MengEmail author
Article
  • 146 Downloads

Abstract

In recent years, environmental problems have occurred frequently in China, and the relationship between environmental performance (EP) and financial performance (FP) plays an indispensable role in exploring the internalization of corporate environmental responsibility. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms in heavily polluting industries and collected data of the Unit Sewage Fee, we empirically examine the impact of EP on FP. Our empirical results show a concave-down quadratic relationship between EP and FP. After heavily polluting industries became subject to stricter environmental disclosure regulations, however, we found that the quadratic relationship between EP and FP became weaker. Moreover, we revealed that for state-owned firms, the quadratic relationship between EP and FP is not as obvious as it is for non-state-owned firms. Our paper contributes to the growing literature on EP management. It also offers evidence of experience in perfecting the design of enterprise environmental information disclosure systems.

Keywords

Environmental performance Financial performance Chinese listed companies Heavily polluting industries 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (Grant Nos. 17YJC630119, 16YJC630089). It was also supported by Soft Science Program of Sichuan Province (Grant No. 2019JDR0155), by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. JBK1801009) and the Research Center for System Sciences and Enterprise Development (Grant No. Xq18B07).

References

  1. Aragoncorrea, J.: Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Acad. Manag. J. 41(5), 556–567 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. Aschehoug, S.H., Boks, C., Støren, S.: Environmental information from stakeholders supporting product development. J. Clean. Prod. 31(12), 1–13 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. Bruton, G.D., Peng, M.W., Ahlstrom, D., Stan, C.V., Xu, K.: State-owned enterprises around the world as hybrid organizations. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 29(1), 92–114 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. Chang, L., Li, W., Lu, X.: Government engagement, environmental policy, and environmental performance: evidence from the most polluting Chinese listed firms. Bus. Strategy Environ. 24(1), 1–19 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. Chen, F., Xu, Y.: Democratization in the host country and institutional risk of cross-border M&A: an empirical study on Chinese listed enterprises. Qual. Quant. 48(2), 1013–1025 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, M.A., Fenn, S., Naimon, J.S.: Environmental and Financial Performance: Are They Related?. Investor Responsibility Research Center, Environmental Information Service, New York City (1995)Google Scholar
  7. Coleman, L.: Losses from failure of stakeholder sensitive processes: financial consequences for large US companies from breakdowns in product, environmental, and accounting standards. J. Bus. Ethics 98(2), 247–258 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. Connors, E., Johnston, H.H., Gao, L.S.: The informational value of Toxics Release Inventory performance. Sustain. Acc. Manag. Policy J. 4(1), 32–55 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. Dögl, C., Holtbrügge, D.: Corporate environmental responsibility, employer reputation and employee commitment: an empirical study in developed and emerging economies. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 25(12), 1739–1762 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. Gerde, V.W., Logsdon, J.M.: Measuring environmental performance: use of the toxics release inventory (tri) and other us environmental databases. Bus. Strategy Environ. 10(5), 269–285 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. Gilley, K.M., Worrell, D.L., Iii, W.N.D., Abuzar, E.-J.: Corporate environmental initiatives and anticipated firm performance: the differential effects of process-driven versus product-driven greening initiatives. J. Manag. 26(6), 1199–1216 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. Gonenc, H., Scholtens, B.: Environmental and financial performance of fossil fuel firms: a closer inspection of their interaction. Ecol. Econ. 132, 307–328 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. Hart, S.L.: A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(4), 986–1014 (1995)Google Scholar
  14. Hart, S.L., Ahuja, G.: Does it pay to be green? an empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Bus. Strategy Environ. 5(1), 30–37 (1996)Google Scholar
  15. He, Y., Chiu, Y., Zhang, B.: The impact of corporate governance on state-owned and non-state-owned firms efficiency in China. N. Am. J. Econ. Finance 33, 252–277 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. Horváthová, E.: Does environmental performance affect financial performance? A meta-analysis. Ecol. Econ. 70(1), 52–59 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. Horváthová, E.: The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: short-term costs and long-term benefits? Ecol. Econ. 84(2), 91–97 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. Iwata, H., Okada, K.: How does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Japanese manufacturing firms. Ecol. Econ. 70(9), 1691–1700 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. Jaggi, B., Freedman, M.: An examination of the impact of pollution performance on economic and market performance: pulp and paper firms. J. Bus. Finance Acc. 19(5), 697–713 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. Khanna, T., Nohria, G.N.: The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strateg. Manag. J. 19(3), 193–210 (1998)Google Scholar
  21. Kubas, A., Inan, I.H., Unakitan, G., Erbay, E.R.: The estimation of the relationships between water-natural gas usage and discharge-emission permission by using binary logistic model for the industrial establishments. Qual. Quant. 42(1), 35–44 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. Latan, H., Chiappetta Jabbour, C.J., Beatriz, L.D.S.J.A., Renwick, D.W.S., Wamba, S.F., Shahbaz, M.: ‘Too-much-of-a-good-thing’? The role of advanced eco-learning and contingency factors on the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance. J. Environ. Manag. 220, 163–172 (2018)Google Scholar
  23. Li, Q., Luo, W., Wang, Y., Wu, L.: Firm performance, corporate ownership, and corporate social, responsibility disclosure in China. Bus. Ethics A Eur. Rev. 22(2), 159–173 (2013)Google Scholar
  24. Lucato, W.C., Costa, E.M., Cardoso, D.O.N.G.: The environmental performance of SMEs in the Brazilian textile industry and the relationship with their financial performance. J. Environ. Manag. 203, 550–556 (2017)Google Scholar
  25. Montabon, F., Sroufe, R., Narasimhan, R.: An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. J. Oper. Manag. 25(5), 998–1014 (2007)Google Scholar
  26. Muhammad, N., Scrimgeour, F., Reddy, K., Abidin, S.: The impact of corporate environmental performance on market risk: the Australian industry case. J. Bus. Ethics 132(2), 347–362 (2015)Google Scholar
  27. Muhammad, N., Scrimgeour, F., Reddy, K., Abidin, S.: Emission indices for hazardous substances: an alternative measure of corporate environmental performance. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 23(1), 15–26 (2016)Google Scholar
  28. Nasrin, S., Rasiah, R., Baskaran, A., Masud, M.M.: What determines the financial performance of microfinance institutions in Bangladesh? a panel data analysis. Qual. Quant. 52(3), 1409–1422 (2018)Google Scholar
  29. Nishitani, K., Jannah, N., Kaneko, S.: Does corporate environmental performance enhance financial performance? An empirical study of indonesian firms. Environ. Dev. 23, 10–21 (2017)Google Scholar
  30. Porter, M.E., Linde, C.V.D.: Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. J. Econ. Perspect. 9(4), 97–118 (1995)Google Scholar
  31. Qi, G.Y., Zeng, S.X., Shi, J.J., Meng, X.H., Lin, H., Yang, Q.X.: Revisiting the relationship between environmental and financial performance in Chinese industry. J. Environ. Manag. 145, 349–356 (2014)Google Scholar
  32. Qiu, R., Xu, J., Zeng, Z.: Carbon emission allowance allocation with a mixed mechanism in air passenger transport. J. Environ. Manag. 200, 204–216 (2017)Google Scholar
  33. Rassier, D.G., Earnhart, D.: Does the porter hypothesis explain expected future financial performance? The effect of clean water regulation on chemical manufacturing firms. Environ. Resour. Econ. 45(3), 353–377 (2010)Google Scholar
  34. Sarkis, J., Cordeiro, J.J.: An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 135(1), 102–113 (2001)Google Scholar
  35. Sen, P., Roy, M., Pal, P.: Exploring role of environmental proactivity in financial performance of manufacturing enterprises: a structural modelling approach. J. Clean. Prod. 108, 583–594 (2015)Google Scholar
  36. Song, H., Zhao, C., Zeng, J.: Can environmental management improve financial performance: an empirical study of A-shares listed companies in China. J. Clean. Prod. 141, 1051–1056 (2017)Google Scholar
  37. Tan, S.H., Habibullah, M.S., Tan, S.K., Choon, S.W.: The impact of the dimensions of environmental performance on firm performance in travel and tourism industry. J. Environ. Manag. 203, 603–611 (2017)Google Scholar
  38. Wagner, M.: The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: a firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecol. Econ. 69(7), 1553–1560 (2010)Google Scholar
  39. Wagner, M., Schaltegger, S., Wehrmeyer, W.: The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: what does theory propose and what does empirical evidence tell us? Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 9(3), 133–146 (2012)Google Scholar
  40. Wang, L.: The changes of China’s environmental policies in the latest 30 years. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2, 1026–1212 (2010)Google Scholar
  41. Xie, C., Luo, C., Yu, X.: Financial distress prediction based on SVM and MDA methods: the case of Chinese listed companies. Qual. Quant. 45(3), 671–686 (2011)Google Scholar
  42. Xu, X., Zeng, Z., Xu, J., Zhang, M.: Fuzzy dynamical system scenario simulation-based cross-border financial contagion analysis: a perspective from international capital flows. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 25(2), 439–459 (2017)Google Scholar
  43. Zeng, Z., Zhu, W., Ke, R., Ash, J., Wang, Y., Xu, J., Xu, X.: A generalized nonlinear model-based mixed multinomial logit approach for crash data analysis. Accid. Anal. Prev. 99, 51–65 (2017)Google Scholar
  44. Zhu, Q., Liu, J., Lai, K.H.: Corporate social responsibility practices and performance improvement among Chinese national state-owned enterprises. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 171, 417–426 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of FinanceSouthwestern University of Finance and EconomicsChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Carey Business SchoolJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Business SchoolSichuan UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations