Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 1587–1609 | Cite as

Gender, public management and organizational performance: evidence from Indonesian public schools

  • Suhaeniti
  • Sangyub RyuEmail author
Article

Abstract

Significant progress has been made to support the positive management-performance link as well as the important role of gender in public management. However, little is known if the current body of knowledge is applicable to developing countries. To fill this gap, this study investigates impacts of school principals’ management functions (managing upward, downward, and outward), and their gender, on school performance in the context of Indonesian public schools. Different findings, compared to the current knowledge accumulated in developed countries, suggest that different approaches to understanding and managing public organizations in developing countries are needed.

Keywords

Public management Gender Performance Public school Indonesia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article is a modified version of Suhaeniti’s master’s thesis. Suhaeniti appreciates Sangyub Ryu for his advice on her thesis and faculty members of International University of Japan for their full supports.

References

  1. Acker, J.: Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: a theory of gendered organizations. Gend. Soc. 4(2), 139–158 (1990).  https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, R., Boyne, G.A., Meier, K.J., O’Toole, L.J., Walker, R.M.: representative bureaucracy, organizational strategy, and public service performance: an empirical analysis of English Local Government. J. Public Adm. Res. Theor. 15(4), 489–504 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bacharach, S.B., Lawler, E.J.: Power and Politics in Organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1980)Google Scholar
  4. Bass, B.M., Avolio, B.J.: Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Adm. Q. 17(1), 112–121 (1993).  https://doi.org/10.2307/40862298 Google Scholar
  5. Bellas, M.L.: Emotional labor in academia: the case of professors. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 561(1), 96–110 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1177/000271629956100107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertelli, A., Feldmann, S.E.: Strategic appointments. J. Public Adm. Res. Theor. 17(1), 19–38 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muj017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burke, S., Collins, K.: Gender differences in leadership styles and management skills. Women Manag. Rev. 16(5), 244–257 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coase, R.H.: The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16), 386–405 (1937)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craig, S.L., Smith, M.S.: The impact of perceived discrimination and social support on the school performance of multiethnic sexual minority youth. Youth Soc. (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x11424915 Google Scholar
  10. DeHart-Davis, L., Marlowe, J., Pandey, S.K.: Gender dimensions of public service motivation. Public Adm. Rev. 66(6), 873–887 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00655.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dinham, S.: Principal leadership for outstanding educational outcomes. J. Educ. Adm. 43(4), 338–356 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fahmi, M.: School Choice and Earnings: A Case of Indonesia. Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University, Bandung (2009)Google Scholar
  13. Fleishman, R.: To participate or not to participate? Incentives and obstacles for collaboration. In: O’Leary, R., Bingham, L.B. (eds.) The Collaborative Public Manager: New Ideas for the Twenty-First Century, pp. 31–52. Georgetown University Press, Washington (2009)Google Scholar
  14. Gates, S., Ringel, J., Santibañez, L.: Who is Leading Our Schools? An Overview of School Administrators and Their Careers. RAND, Santa Monica (2003)Google Scholar
  15. Gulick, L.: Notes on the theory of organization. In: Gulick, L., Urwick, L. (eds.) Papers on the Science of Administration. Columbia University Press, New York (1937)Google Scholar
  16. Guy, M.E., Duke, L.L.: Personal and social background as determinants of position. In: Guy, M.E. (ed.) Women and Men of the State: Public Administrators at the State Level, pp. 43–60. M. E. Sharpe, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  17. Guy, M.E., Newman, M.A.: Women’s jobs, men’s jobs: sex segregation and emotional labor. Public Adm. Rev. 64(3), 289–298 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00373.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hallinger, P.: The evolving role of american principals: from managerial to instructional to transformational leaders. J. Educ. Adm. 3(3), 35–48 (1992)Google Scholar
  19. Hallinger, P.: Leading educational change: reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Camb. J. Educ. 33(3), 329–352 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hennessey, J.T.: Reinventing government does leadership make the difference? Public Adm. Rev. 58(6), 522–532 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacobson, W.S., Palus, C.K., Bowling, C.J.: A woman’s touch? Gendered management and performance in state administration. J. Public Adm. Res. Theor. 20(2), 477–504 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jung, K., Jae Moon, M., Hahm, Sung Deuk: Exploring the linkage between ministerial leadership and performance in Korea. Administration & Society 40(7), 667–690 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399708323135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kellough, J.E., Nigro, L.G.: Pay for performance in Georgia State Government: employee perspectives on GeorgiaGain after 5 years. Rev. Public Pers. Adm. 22(2), 146–166 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kelly, R.M., Boutilier, M.: The Making of Political Women: A Study of Socialization and Role Conflict. Nelson-Hall, Chicago (1978)Google Scholar
  25. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., Steinbach, R.: Leadership and other conditions which foster organizational learning in schools. In: Leithwood, K., Louis, K.S. (eds.) Organizational Learning in Schools. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse (1998a)Google Scholar
  26. Leithwood, K., Leonard, L., Sharratt, L.: Conditions fostering organizational learning in schools. Educ. Adm. Q. 34(2), 243–276 (1998b).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x98034002005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lowe, K.B., Kroeck, K.G., Sivasubramaniam, N.: Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadersh. Q. 7(3), 385–425 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marks, H.M., Printy, S.M.: Principal leadership and school performance: an integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educ. Adm. Q. 39(3), 370–397 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x03253412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meier, K.J., Mastracci, S.H., Wilson, K.: Gender and emotional labor in public organizations: an empirical examination of the link to performance. Public Adm. Rev. 66(6), 899–909 (2006a).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00657.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meier, K.J., O’Toole, L.J.: Public management and organizational performance: the impact of managerial quality. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 21(3), 629–643 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meier, K.J., O’Toole, L.J.: Public management and educational performance: the impact of managerial networking. Public Adm. Rev. 63(6), 689–699 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meier, K.J., O’Toole, L.J., Goerdel, H.T.: Management activity and program performance: gender as management capital. Public Adm. Rev. 66(1), 24–36 (2006b).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00553.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Milward, H.B., Provan, K.G.: Governing the hollow state. J. Public Adm. Res. Theor. 10(2), 359–380 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moe, T.M.: The new economics of organization. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 28(4), 739–777 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moore, M.H.: Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  36. Nicholson-Crotty, S., O’Toole, L.J.: Testing a model of public management and organizational performance: the case of law-enforcement agenceis. J. Public Adm. Res. Theor. 14(1), 1–19 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Toole, L.J.: Treating networks seriously: practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Adm. Rev. 57(1), 45–52 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. O’Toole, L.J., Meier, K.J.: Desperately seeking Selznick: cooptation and the dark side of public management in networks. Public Adm. Rev. 64(6), 681–693 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Toole, L.J., Meier, K.J.: The human side of public organizations. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 39(5), 499–518 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008323805 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Toole, L.J., Meier, K.J., Nicholson-Crotty, S.: Managing upward, downward, and outward: networks, hierarchical relationships and performance. Public Manag. Rev. 7(1), 45–68 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Park, S.M., Rainey, H.G.: Leadership and public service motivation in U.S. Federal Agencies. Int. Public Manag. J. 11(1), 109–142 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pfiffner, J.P.: Political appointees and career executives: the democracy–bureaucracy nexus in the third century. Public Adm. Rev. 47(1), 57–65 (1987).  https://doi.org/10.2307/975472 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pong, S.-L., Hao, L.: Neighborhood and school factors in the school performance of immigrants’ children1. Int. Migrat. Rev. 41(1), 206–241 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2007.00062.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Powell, G.: Women and Men in Management, 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury Park (1993)Google Scholar
  45. Provan, K.G., Milward, H.B.: A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: a comparative study of four community mental health systems. Adm. Sci. Q. 40(1), 1–33 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosenbaum, J.E.: Beyond College for All. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  47. Rumberger, R.W., Palardy, G.J.: Test Scores, dropout rates, and transfer rates as alternative indicators of high school performance. Am. Educ. Res. J. 42(1), 3–42 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042001003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Statham, A.: The gender model revisited: differences in the management styles of men and women. Sex Roles 16(7–8), 409–430 (1987).  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289552 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Strivers, C.: Gender Images in Public Administration: Legitimacy and the Administrative State, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2002)Google Scholar
  50. Talmud, I., Izraeli, D.N.: The relationship between gender and performance issues of concern to directors: correlates or institution? J. Org. Behav. 20(4), 459–474 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199907)20:4<459::AID-JOB924>3.0.CO;2-J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thomson, A.M., Perry, J.L.: Collaboration processes: inside the black box. Public Adm. Rev. 66, 20–32 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thurner, P.W., Binder, M.: Formal and real authority of ministerial jurisdictions in semi-open states: the comparative value of administrative inside and outside networking. J. Eur. Public Policy 19(6), 817–843 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.614146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Walker, R.M., Andrews, R., Boyne, G.A., Meier, K.J., Laurence, J., O’Toole Jr.: Wakeup call: Strategic management, network alarms, and performance. Public Adm. Rev. 70(5), 731–741 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilkins, V.M., Keiser, L.R.: Linking passive and active representation by gender: the case of child support agencies. J. Public Adm. Res. Theor. 16(1), 87–102 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson, J.Q.: Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. Basic Books, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  56. Wooldridge, J.M.: Introductory econometrics a modern approach. South-Western Cengage Learning (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ministry of Public Works and Housing in Indonesian GovernmentJakartaIndonesia
  2. 2.Department of Public AdministrationYonsei UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations