Quality & Quantity

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 1187–1207 | Cite as

Subjective well-being among the elderly: A bibliometric analysis

  • Miha Dominko
  • Miroslav VerbičEmail author


Demographic trends have stimulated interest in empirical research on subjective well-being among the elderly. Despite the steep increase in published articles, no one has yet provided a summarized review of the scientific landscape. With this article, we aim to fill this research gap by providing a bibliometric analysis of the field. We do so by collecting a broad dataset of publication data from 1961 to 2016 found on the Web of Science webpage. By combining quantitative scientometric methods, as well as qualitative methods, we were able to provide a historic context of research on subjective well-being among the elderly and distinguish the most important articles, authors, journals, organizations and countries in the field. We found a big leap in research on subjective well-being among the elderly in the last 10 years, as well as a substantial globalization of the field. Although research on subjective well-being among the elderly has clear antecedents, we expect the field to further increase and mature due to more scholars from different braches of science joining the conversation.


Subjective well-being The elderly Happiness studies Life satisfaction Positive affect Bibliometric mapping Bibliographic coupling 

JEL Classification



  1. Aknin, L.B., Barrington-Leigh, C.P., Dunn, E.W., Helliwell, J.F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., Kemeza, I., Nyende, P., Aston-James, C.E., Norton, M.I.: Prosocial spending and well-being: cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 104(4), 635–652 (2013). Google Scholar
  2. Baltes, M.M., Baltes, P.B.: The Psychology of Control and Aging. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah (1986)Google Scholar
  3. Bradburn, N.M.: Structure of Psychological Well-Being. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago (1969)Google Scholar
  4. Brenner, M.H., Curbow, B., Javitt, J.C., Legro, M.W., Sommer, A.: Vision change and quality of life in the elderly. Response to cataract surgery and treatment of other chronic ocular conditions. Arch. Ophthalmol. 111(5), 680–685 (1993). Google Scholar
  5. Carstensen, L.L., Turan, B., Scheibe, S., Ram, N., Ersner-Hershfield, H., Samanez-Larkin, G.R., Brooks, K.P., Nesselroade, J.R.: Emotional experience improves with age: evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychol. Aging 26(1), 21–33 (2011). Google Scholar
  6. Chatfield, W.F.: Economic and sociological factors influencing life satisfaction of the aged. J. Gerontol. 32(5), 593–599 (1977). Google Scholar
  7. Diener, E., Chan, M.Y.: Happy people live longer: subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Appl. Psychol. Health Well-Being 3(1), 1–43 (2011). Google Scholar
  8. Ellison, C.G., Boardman, J.D., Williams, D.R., Jackson, J.S.: Religious involvement, stress, and mental health: findings from the 1995 Detroit Area Study. Soc. Forces 80(1), 215–249 (2001). Google Scholar
  9. Gerstorf, D., Ram, N., Mayraz, G., Hidajat, M., Lindenberger, U., Wagner, G.G., Schupp, J.: Late-life decline in well-being across adulthood in Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States: something is seriously wrong at the end of life. Psychol. Aging 25(2), 477–485 (2010). Google Scholar
  10. Graney, M.J.: Happiness and social participation in aging. J. Gerontol. 30(6), 701–706 (1975). Google Scholar
  11. Greenfield, E.A., Marks, N.F.: Formal volunteering as a protective factor for older adults’ psychological well-being. J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 59(5), 258–264 (2004). Google Scholar
  12. He, W., Goodkind, D., Kowal, P.: An Aging World: 2015 International Population Reports. United States Census Bureau, Suitland (2016)Google Scholar
  13. Hirsch, J.E.: An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102(46), 16569–16572 (2005). Google Scholar
  14. Hunsberger, B.: Religion, age, life satisfaction, and perceived sources of religiousness: a study of older persons. J. Gerontol. 40(5), 615–620 (1985). Google Scholar
  15. Hyde, M., Wiggins, R.D., Higgs, P., Blane, D.B.: A measure of quality of life in early old age: the theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model (CASP-19). Aging Ment. Health 7(3), 186–194 (2003). Google Scholar
  16. Kempen, G.I.J.M., Ormel, J., Brilman, E.I., Relyveld, J.: Adaptive responses among dutch elderly: the impact of eight chronic medical conditions on health-related quality of life. Am. J. Public Health 87(1), 38–44 (1997). Google Scholar
  17. Kessler, M.M.: Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Am. Doc. 14(1), 10–25 (1963). Google Scholar
  18. Keyes, C.L.M., Shmotkin, D., Ryff, C.D.: Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82(6), 1007–1022 (2002). Google Scholar
  19. Kullenberg, C., Nelhans, G.: The happiness turn? Mapping the emergence of “happiness studies” using cited references. Scientometrics 103(2), 615–630 (2015). Google Scholar
  20. Lee, G.R., Ellithorpe, E.: Intergenerational exchange and subjective well-being among the elderly. J. Marriage Fam. 44(1), 217–224 (1982). Google Scholar
  21. Lemon, B.W., Bengtson, V.L., Peterson, J.A.: An exploration of the activity theory of aging: activity types and life satisfaction among in-movers to a retirement community. J. Gerontol. 27(4), 511–523 (1972). Google Scholar
  22. Markides, K.S., Martin, H.W.: A causal model of life satisfaction among the elderly. J. Gerontol. 34(1), 86–93 (1979). Google Scholar
  23. Mather, M., Carstensen, L.L.: Aging and attentional biases for emotional faces. Psychol. Sci. 14(5), 409–415 (2003). Google Scholar
  24. Möller, A.M., Ansari, P., Ebrahim, N.A., Khoo, S.: Physical activity and aging research: a bibliometric analysis. J. Aging Phys. Activity 24(3), 476–483 (2016). Google Scholar
  25. Neugarten, B.L., Havighurst, R.J., Tobin, S.S.: The measurement of life satisfaction. J. Gerontol. 14, 134–143 (1961). Google Scholar
  26. Osberg, J.S., McGinnis, G.E., DeJong, G., Seward, M.L.: Life satisfaction and quality of life among disabled elderly adults. J. Gerontol. 42(2), 228–230 (1987). Google Scholar
  27. Pinquart, M., Sörensen, S.: Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Aging 15(2), 187–224 (2000). Google Scholar
  28. Rejeski, W.J., Mihalko, S.L.: Physical activity and quality of life in older adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 56(Supplement 2), 23–35 (2001). Google Scholar
  29. Ryff, C.D.: Beyond Ponce de Leon and life satisfaction: new directions in quest of successful ageing. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 12(1), 35–55 (1989). Google Scholar
  30. Salovey, Pe, Rothman, A., Detweiler, J., Steward, W.: Emotional states and physical health. Am. Psychol. 55(1), 110–121 (2000). Google Scholar
  31. Spreitzer, E., Snyder, E.E.: Correlates of life satisfaction among the aged. J. Gerontol. 29(4), 454–458 (1974). Google Scholar
  32. Steinkamp, M.W., Kelly, J.R.: Social integration, leisure activity, and life satisfaction in older adults: activity theory revisited. Int. J. Aging Hum. Dev. 25(4), 293–307 (1987). Google Scholar
  33. Tobin, S.S., Neugarten, B.L.: Life satisfaction and social interaction in the aging. J. Gerontol. 16(4), 344–346 (1961). Google Scholar
  34. Toseland, R., Sykes, J.: Senior citizens center participation and other correlates of life satisfaction. Gerontologist 17(3), 235–241 (1977). Google Scholar
  35. van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L.: Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84(2), 523–538 (2010). Google Scholar
  36. van Nunen, K., Li, J., Reniers, G., Ponnet, K.: Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research. Saf. Sci. 108, 248–258 (2018). Google Scholar
  37. Van Willigen, M.: Differential benefits of volunteering across the life course. J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 55(5), S308–S318 (2000). Google Scholar
  38. Župić, I., Čater, T.: Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Org. Res. Methods 18(3), 429–472 (2015). Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Economic ResearchLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Faculty of Economics, University of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations