Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 1165–1186 | Cite as

Bordered communities: the perception of insecurity in five European cities

  • Sonia StefanizziEmail author
  • Valeria Verdolini
Article

Abstract

The article explores the results of a recent European empirical study within the project Margin: tackling insecurity in marginalized areas, funded with the Horizon 2020 Programme, on the perception of insecurity in five European cities (Barcelona, Budapest, London, Milan, and Paris). The results of the fieldwork (ethnographic observation, focus groups and interviews) in the five cities show how social cohesion and socio-economic inequalities are the main factors in the production of the feeling of insecurity in the urban space. According to these major results, metropolitan neighborhoods reveal new and growing invisible borders, segregate vulnerable groups and create gated communities in wider contexts.

Keywords

Urban insecurity Security and safety Urban segregation Vulnerable groups 

References

  1. Amin, A.: Ethnicity and the multicultural city: living with diversity. Environ. Plann A Econ. Space 34(3), 385–399 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. Ash, A.: Ethnicity and the multicultural city: living with diversity. Environ. Plan. A 34(6), 959–980 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. Barth, F.: Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. Allen and Unwin, London (1969)Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z.: La solitudine del cittadino globale. Feltrinelli, Milano (2000)Google Scholar
  5. Bauman, Z.: La società individualizzata: come cambia la nostra esperienza. Il Mulino, Bologna (2002)Google Scholar
  6. Bauman, Z.: Fiducia e paura nella città (2005). Bruno Mondadori, Milano (2005)Google Scholar
  7. Bauman, Z.: Modernità liquida. Editori Laterza, Bari (2007)Google Scholar
  8. Beck, U.: La società del rischio. Carocci, Roma (2000)Google Scholar
  9. Boltanski, L., Chiapello, E.: Il nuovo spirito del capitalismo. Mimesis, Milano (2014)Google Scholar
  10. Bourgois, P., Schonberg, J.: Righteous Dopefiend. University of California Press, Oakland (2009)Google Scholar
  11. Bourgois, P.: Neoliberal Lumpen Abuse: homeless heroin injectors and crack smokers in San Francisco. Paper Presented to the Anthropology Department at New York University, Sep 25, 2008Google Scholar
  12. Bourgois, P.: Lumpen abuse: the human cost of righteous neoliberalism. City Soc. 23(1), 2–12 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. Boyd, R.: The value of civility? Urban Stud. 43(5/6), 863–878 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. Calavita, K.: Immigrants at the margins: law, race, and exclusion in Southern Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  15. Castells, M.: The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring and the Urban-Regional Process. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford (1989)Google Scholar
  16. Chan, J., To, H., Chan, E.: Reconsidering social cohesion: developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Soc. Indic. Res. 75, 273–302 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. Council of Europe: Methodological guide, concerted of development of social cohesion indicators. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg (2005)Google Scholar
  18. De Giorgi, A.: Il governo dell’eccedenza. Ombre Corte, Verona (2002)Google Scholar
  19. Farmer, P., Sen, A.: Pathologies of Power: Health, Human Rights, and the New War on the Poor (2003)Google Scholar
  20. Ferracuti, F.: European migration and crime. In: Wolfgang, M. (ed.) Essays in Honor of Thorsen Sellin, pp. 189–219. Wiley, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  21. Franko, K., Bosworth, M.: The borders of punishment: Migration, citizenship, and social exclusion. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)Google Scholar
  22. Fyfe, N., Bannister, J., Kearns, A.: (In)civility and the city. Urban Stud. 43(5/6), 853–861 (2006)Google Scholar
  23. Garland, D.: Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1990)Google Scholar
  24. Garland, D.: Punishment and Welfare: A History of Penal Strategies, Gower (1985)Google Scholar
  25. Garland, D.: The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2001)Google Scholar
  26. Girard, R.: Il capro espiatorio. Adelphi, Milano (1987)Google Scholar
  27. Hunter, A.: Symbols of incivility: social disorder and fear of crime in urban neighborhoods. Annual Meeting of the American Criminological Society, Dallas (1978)Google Scholar
  28. Kelling, G.L., Wilson, J.Q.: Broken windows: the police and neighborhood safety. Atl. Mon. 249(3), 29–38 (1982)Google Scholar
  29. Kleinman, A., Das, V., e Lock, M. (eds.): Social suffering. University of California Press, Berkeley (1997)Google Scholar
  30. Kleinman, A., Kleinman, J.: Suffering and its professional transformation: toward an ethnography of interpersonal experience. Cult. Med. Psychiatry 15(3), 275 (1991)Google Scholar
  31. Lasch, C.: Democracy and ‘the crisis of confidence. Democracy 1(1), 25–40 (1981)Google Scholar
  32. Lipset S., M., Rokkan S.: Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: an introduction. In: Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-Nation (1967)Google Scholar
  33. Lockwood, D.: Civic integration and social integration. In: Gough, I., Olofsson, G. (eds.) Capitalism and Social Cohesion. MacMillian Press, London (1999)Google Scholar
  34. Melossi, D.: Stato, controllo sociale e devianza. Bruno Mondadori, Milano (2002)Google Scholar
  35. Melossi, D.: The State of Social Control: A Sociological Study of Concepts of State and Social Control in the Making of Democracy. St. Martin press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  36. Park, R.: Human migration and the marginal man. Am. J. Soc. 33(6), 881–893 (1928)Google Scholar
  37. Pitch, T.: La società della prevenzione. Carocci, Roma (2006)Google Scholar
  38. Park, R.E., Burgess, E.W.: The City. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1925)Google Scholar
  39. Phillips, T., Smith, P.: Rethinking urban incivility research: strangers, bodies and circulations. Urban Stud. 43(5), 879–901 (2006)Google Scholar
  40. Sampson, R.J., Raudenbush, S.W.: Systematic social observation of public spaces: a new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. Am. J. Sociol. 105(3), 603–651 (1999)Google Scholar
  41. Sampson, R.J., Raudenbush, S.W.: Seeing disorder: neighborhood stigma and the social construction of broken windows. Soc. Psychol. Q. 67, 319–342 (2004)Google Scholar
  42. Schifer, D., van der Noll, J.: Essentials of social cohesion: a literature review. Soc. Ind. Res. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1314-5 Google Scholar
  43. Sennett, R.: The Fall of Public Man. Norton, New York (1976)Google Scholar
  44. Shaw, C., McKay, H.D.: Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1942)Google Scholar
  45. Skogan, W.G., Harnett, S.M., Lovig, J.H., et al.: Community Policing in Chicago, Year Two. Criminal Justice Information Authority, Chicago (1995)Google Scholar
  46. Tonry, M.H.: Ethnicity, Crime, and Immigration: Summary of a Presentation/by Michael Tonry. United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, University of California Press, Washington, DC (1997)Google Scholar
  47. Weisburd, D., Hinkle, J.C., Braga, A.A., Wooditch, A.: Understanding the mechanisms underlying broken windows policing: the need for evaluation evidence. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 52(4), 589–608 (2015)Google Scholar
  48. Wonders, N.: Transforming borders from below. In: Weber, L. (ed.) Rethinking Border Control for a Globalising World: A Preferred Future, pp. 190–198. Routledge, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  49. Wonders, N.: Conceptualizing difference. In: Prior, S., Jones, L. (eds.) Investigating Difference: Human and Cultural Relations in Criminal Justice, 3rd edn, pp. 8–21. Pearson, New York (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università degli Studi di Milano-BicoccaMilanoItalia

Personalised recommendations