Quality & Quantity

, Volume 52, Supplement 2, pp 1245–1252 | Cite as

Developments and assessments on barrier-free it in Turkey

  • Mustafa Özhan KalaçEmail author
  • Gonca Telli Yamamoto


The ratio of the population with disabilities in Turkey was approximately 12 percent as of 2002, and only a very little portion of them were found to have reached the higher education level. Furthermore, contribution of people with disabilities to employment is also important for their wellness and experiencing civil liberties. Barrier-free IT is among the most important tools in this respect. There is a legislation in Turkey for the practices in this field, and the special circumstances and technological services-related studies for accessibility are considered within the framework of a universal service. The shift towards an information society should offer an environment which involves all individuals of the society. Inter-institutional cooperation and more effective use of the resources are required to overcome the barriers. Furthermore, keeping a national database is also important for correct distribution and ensuring effectiveness of the resources. The problem of accessibility and availability in information technologies and services is waiting for a solution. Information technologies play a critical and distinctive role to solve these problems and create employment for people with impairment. This is a descriptive study on the developments and assessments regarding Barrier-Free IT in Turkey.


Barrier-Free IT Information technology Disability Education 


  1. Bolte, S., Golan, O., Goodwin, M.: What can innovative technologies do for autism spectrum disorders? Autism 14, 155–159 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cosco, F., Garre, C., Bruno, F., Muzzupappa, M., Otaduy, M.: Visuo-haptic mixed reality with unobstructed tool-hand integration. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Gr. 19, 159–172 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Doucet, M., Guillemot, J., Lassonde, M., Gagné, J., Leclerc, C., Lepore, F.: Blind subjects process auditory spectral cues more efficiently than sighted individuals. Exp. Brain Res. 160, 194–202 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gentry, T., Wallace, J., Kvarfordt, C.: Personal digital assistants as cognitive aids to high school students with autism: results of a community-based trial. J. Vocat. Rehabil. 32, 101–107 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. Gillespie-Lynch, K., Kapp, S.K., Shane-Simpson, C.: Intersections between the autism spectrum and the internet: perceived benefits and preferred functions of computer-mediated communication. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 52(6), 456–469 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hedges, S.H., Odom, S.L., Hume, M., Sam, A.: Technology Use as a Support Tool by Secondary Students with Autism. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2017)Google Scholar
  7. Lazar, J., Wentz, B.: Ensuring accessibility for people with disabilities. In: Buie, E., Murray, D. (eds.) Usability in Government Systems. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2012)Google Scholar
  8. TÜİK: Survey on people with disabilities in Turkey (2002). Accessed 10 Dec 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manisa Celal Bayar UniversityManisaTurkey
  2. 2.Maltepe UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations