Quality & Quantity

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 1137–1157 | Cite as

Evaluating corruption under the application of the SOCIO-economic development desgrowth index (Ð-index): the case of Guatemala

  • Mario Arturo Ruiz Estrada
  • Marcin Waldemar Staniewski
  • Ibrahim Ndoma
Article

Abstract

Getting a clear sense of the intensity and dynamics of corruption in a society or country is a critical platform for economic growth and development. This paper sets out to bring clarity to the study of corruption through an alternative approach. It examines and demonstrates how corruption can be evaluated by basically hinging it on the socio-economic development deaccumulation that any country can experience in different historical periods. The paper presents the socio-economic development desgrowth index (Ð-index), a new indicator with a complete set of mathematical tools that capture and calculate all the aspects that encompass corruption within a system or country. The paper successfully applied the (Ð-index) to X-ray the successive administrations of Guatemala from 1986 to year 2016 from where we convincingly observed the highs and lows in the corruption dynamics of Guatemala.

Keywords

Corruption Inflation Poverty Economic modelling Policy modeling 

JEL Classification

H5 H10 

References

  1. Aidt, T.S.: Corruption, institutions, and economic development. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 25(2), 271–291 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagolin, I., Comim, F.: Human development index (HDI) and its family of indexes: an evolving critical review. Rev. Econ. 34(2), 7–28 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G., Stigler, G.: Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers. J. Leg. Stud. 3(1), 1–18 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gyimah-Brempong, K.: Corruption, economic growth, and income inequality in Africa. Econ. Gov. 3(3), 183–209 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Huntington, S.P.: Political Order in Changing Societies. Yale University Press, New Haven (1968)Google Scholar
  6. International Monetary Fund (IMF). www.imf.org. Accessed 1 May 2016
  7. Klitgaard, R.: Controlling Corruption. University of California Press, Oakland (1991)Google Scholar
  8. Lambsdorff, J.G.: Causes and consequences of corruption: What do we know from a cross-section of countries? In: Rose Ackerman, S. (ed.) International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2006)Google Scholar
  9. Leff, N.H.: Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. Am. Behav. Sci. 8, 8–14 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Procudaria de los Derechos Humanos de Guatemala (PDH). www.pdh.org. Accessed 15 Jan 2016
  11. Rose-Ackerman, S.: Corruption: A Study in in Political Economy. Academic Press, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  12. Ruiz Estrada, M.A.: Policy modeling: definition, classification and evaluation. J. Policy Model. 33(3), 523–536 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ruiz Estrada, M.A., Yap, S.F.: The origins and evolution of policy modeling. J. Policy Model. 35(1), 170–182 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W.: Corrup. Quart. J. Econ. 108(3), 599–617 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sistema de Integracion Economica Centro Americana (SIECA). www.sieca.int. Accessed 25 Mar 2016
  16. United Nations (UN). http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/. Accessed 25 May 2016

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Arturo Ruiz Estrada
    • 1
  • Marcin Waldemar Staniewski
    • 2
  • Ibrahim Ndoma
    • 3
  1. 1.Social Security Research Centre (SSRC), Centre of Poverty and Development Studies (CPDS), Faculty of Economics and Administration (FEA)Kuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.University of Finance and ManagementWarsawPoland
  3. 3.Faculty of Economics and AdministrationUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations