What do respondents mean when they report to be “citizens of the world”? Using probing questions to elucidate international differences in cosmopolitanism
The measurement of cosmopolitanism, i.e. the feeling of being a citizen of the world and the corresponding openness towards other cultures and peoples, has proved to be challenging and several scholars have questioned its validity. In this paper, we use web probing, i.e. implementing probing techniques of cognitive interviewing in web surveys, to elucidate the meaning of a frequently used direct measure of cosmopolitanism that asks respondents to what extent they feel they are “a citizen of the world”. As a single-item measure, it cannot be analyzed by statistical approaches such as confirmatory factor analysis. We compare results from Spain, Denmark, Hungary, Germany, Canada, and the U.S. Though the majority of the respondents show an understanding of the item which corresponds to the intention of the researchers, a large part of them does not. In addition, some country differences in the open answers make sense but other differences between countries are hard to explain. We conclude that asking people to what extent they feel they are “a citizen of the world” does not capture well the concept of cosmopolitanism as used in the literature.
KeywordsCosmopolitan attitudes International comparisons Open answers Web probing
This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) [Grant Numbers BR 908/3-1, BR 908/5-1].
- Beck, U.: The Cosmopolitan Vision. Polity Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
- Beck, U., Grande, E.: Kosmopolitisches Europa. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main (2004)Google Scholar
- Calhoun, C.: The class consciousness of frequent travelers: Towards a critique of actually existing cosmopolitanism. In: Vertovec, S., Cohen, R. (eds.) Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context, and Practice, pp. 86–100. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)Google Scholar
- Delanty, G. (ed.): The Routledge Handbook of Cosmopolitan Studies. Routledge, New York (2012)Google Scholar
- Duchesne, S., Haegel, F., Frazer, E., Van Ingelgom, V., Garcia, G., Frognier, A.-P.: Europe between integration and globalisation. Social differences and national frames in the analysis of focus groups conducted in France, francophone Belgium and the United Kingdom. Politique européenne 1(30), 67–105 (2010). doi: 10.3917/poeu.030.0067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- European Commission: Eurobarometer 71.3. TNS Opinion & Social [Producer]; GESIS. Cologne [Publisher]. ZA4973, dataset version 3.0.0, (2012). doi: 10.4232/1.11135 (2009)
- EVS: European Values Study 2008: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2008). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4800 Data file Version 4.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12458 (2016)
- Gaxie, D., Hubé, N., Rowell, J. (eds.): Perceptions of Europe. A Comparative Sociology of European Attitudes. ECPR Press, Wivenhoe Park (2011)Google Scholar
- Held, D.: Democracy and the Global Order. Polity Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
- ISSP Research Group: International Social Survey Programme: National Identity III. ISSP 2013. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5950 Data file Version 2.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12312 (2015)
- Kaldor, M.: New and Old Wars. Polity Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
- Vertovec, S., Cohen, R.: Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context, and Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)Google Scholar