Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 51, Issue 3, pp 1305–1320 | Cite as

Learning organization at higher education institutions in the EU: proposal for implementing philosophy of learning organization—results from research

  • Helena Čierna
  • Erika SujováEmail author
  • Patrycja Hąbek
  • Elena Horská
  • Zuzana Kapsdorferová
Article

Abstract

For an organization to develop, to improve, and to innovate in this information age, it requires a management system that will maximize use of human potential that it has at its disposal and it develops by establishing a culture of learning and of continuous progress. The article offers a specific outlook on how to analyze, measure, and evaluate level of implementation of the learning organization theory as an approach to managing organizations at higher education institutions in the EU, including Slovakia, versus the private sector. It includes results from our research, which we conducted between the years 2011 and 2013. To evaluate results of our research, we used adequate mathematical and statistical methods. Methods of analysis and synthesis as well as a comparison method were used to interpret results from the research and to form conclusions based on which we have formulated theoretical and practical contributions. In the article we outlined possibilities for further development of the studied topic; we offer suggestions and recommendations for organizations that aim to implement the learning organization philosophy in practice.

Keywords

Learning organization Implementation System Self-evaluation 

References

  1. Antal, A.B., Dierkes, M., Child, J., Nonaka, I.: Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge, pp. 1–7. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)Google Scholar
  2. Asif, M., Roauf, A.: Setting the course for quality assurance in higher education. Qual. Quant. 47(4), 2009–2024 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burg, B., Mann, J.D.: Giving it your all—five principles for creating a culture of excellence. Qual. Particip. 31(1), 7–11 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. Carter, E.: Successful change requires more than change management. Qual. Particip. 31(1), 20–23 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, T., Rollo, C.: Corporate initiatives in knowledge management. Educ. Train. 43(4–5), 206–214 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coakes, E., Willis, D., Clarke, S.: Knowledge management in the SocioTechnical world. Springer, London (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collison, C., Parcel, G.: Knowledge management. Computer Press, Brno (2005)Google Scholar
  8. Coulson-Thomas, C.: Leading and managing change. Manag Serv 53(1), 31–37 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. Čierna, H.: Spoločensky zodpovedné podnikanie a model výnimočnosti, vol. 35. Studia oeconomica, Banská Bystrica (2008)Google Scholar
  10. Čierna, H., Sujová, E., Ťavodová, M.: Separated Aspects of Management for Engineers (in slovak). FEVT, TU Zvolen, Zvolen (2015)Google Scholar
  11. Detienne, K.B., Dyer, G., Hoopes, C., Harris, S.: Toward a model of effective knowledge management and directions for future research: culture, leadership, and CKOs. J Leadersh Org Stud 10(4), 26–41 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gau, W.-B.: Public servants´workplace learning: a reflection on the concept of communities of practice. Qual. Quant. 47(3), 1519–1530 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gellerman, K.R.: Why „Good“Managers make bad ethical choices. In: Badaracco, J.L. (ed.) Harvard Business Review on Corporate Ethics, pp. 49–66. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, Boston (2003)Google Scholar
  14. Gregerman, A.: Unlocking genius in yourself and your organization. Qual. Particip. 30(2), 9–13 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. Hąbek, P.: Evaluation of sustainability reporting practices in Poland. Qual. Quant. 48(3), 1739–1752 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hąbek, P., Wolniak, R.: Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states. Qual. Quant. 49(1), 1–22 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamel, G., Green, B.: The future of Management. Harvard Business Press, Praha (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heintschel, B.: Dienstleistungs-qualität aus Kundensicht (engl. Service-Quality from the Client’s Perspective). Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hislop, D.: Knowledge Management in Organizations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  20. Hosmer, L.T.: The Ethics of Management. McGraw-Hill, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  21. Jacobsen, J.: Process improvement and cost savings. Qual. Particip. 30(4), 5–15 (2007)Google Scholar
  22. Kokavcová, D.: Knowledge management in a learning organization. In: Innovation- Factor of Competitiveness of Small and Medium Enterprises in the Global Economic Environment. EF UMB, Banská Bystria, pp. 162–169 (2009)Google Scholar
  23. Minárová, M.: Learning organisation as a basic framework of application of knowledge management. In: Bussiness enterprise in EU conditions, pp. 290–300. Deni-Press, Katowice (2009)Google Scholar
  24. Nonaka, I.: The knowledge-creating company. Harv. Bus. Rev. 85(7/8), 62–171 (2007)Google Scholar
  25. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., Byosiére, P.: A theory of organizational knowledge creation: understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge. In: Dierekes, M., Antal, A.B., Child, J., Nonaka, I. (eds.) Handbook of Organizational Learning & Knowledge, pp. 491–517. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)Google Scholar
  26. Onwuegbuzie, A., Leech, N.: Taking the „Q“out of research: teaching research methodology courses without the divide between quantitative and qualitative paradigms. Qual. Quant. 39(3), 267–295 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paine, L.S.R.: Managing for organizational integrity. In: Badaracco, J.L. (ed.) Harvard Business Review on Corporate Ethics, pp. 85–112. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, Boston (2003)Google Scholar
  28. Pedler, M., Burgyone, J., Boydell, T.: The learning company. McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead (1997)Google Scholar
  29. Petříková, R., Kolektív, A.: Modern Knowledge Management. Professional Publishing, Přibram (2010)Google Scholar
  30. Senge, P.M.: Dimensions of a learning city. Reflections 7(1), 1–6 (2006)Google Scholar
  31. Senge, P.M.: Taking personal change seriously: the impact of organizational learning on management practice. Acad. Manag. Exec. 17(2), 47–50 (2003)Google Scholar
  32. Senge, P.M.: The Fifth Discipline: Theory and Practice of a Learning Organization. Management Press, Praha (2007)Google Scholar
  33. Webber, A.M.: How to become a learning organization (experiences from coca). Mod. Manag. 36(1), 30–31 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helena Čierna
    • 1
  • Erika Sujová
    • 1
    Email author
  • Patrycja Hąbek
    • 2
  • Elena Horská
    • 3
  • Zuzana Kapsdorferová
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Manufacturing Technology and Quality Management, Faculty of Environmental and Manufacturing TechnologyTechnical University in ZvolenZvolenSlovak Republic
  2. 2.Faculty of Organization and ManagementSilesian University of TechnologyZabrzePoland
  3. 3.Faculty of Economics and ManagementSlovak University of Agriculture in NitraNitraSlovak Republic

Personalised recommendations