Advertisement

The Relational Production of Workplace Equality: The Case of Worker-Recuperated Businesses in Argentina

  • Katherine SoberingEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Work organizations are commonly studied as sites that produce and reproduce inequality. But we know much less about how organizations promote equality. This article examines efforts to broaden access to power, opportunity, and resources in Hotel Bauen, a worker-recuperated business that was converted from a privately-owned company into a worker-run cooperative. Drawing on extensive ethnographic and archival research, I analyze efforts to redesign and redefine work through collective decision-making, job rotation, and pay equity. The article concludes by identifying three mechanisms of equality—inclusion, opportunity distribution, and symbolic leveling—to theorize the relational production of workplace equality and complement the near-exclusive focus on inequality and its effects.

Keywords

Relational inequality Equality Worker cooperatives Worker-recuperated businesses Argentina 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which improved this manuscript. Many thanks are also due to Javier Auyero, Kate Averett, Nino Bariola, Caitlyn Collins, Jennifer Glass, Kristine Kilanski, Megan Tobias Neely, Samantha Simon, Amanda Stevenson, Inbar Weiss, and Christine Williams, all of whom provided feedback on previous drafts. This research was funded in part by the National Science Foundation (Award #1519204), the Fulbright Commission to Argentina, and the University of Texas at Austin. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2016 annual meeting of the American Sociological Association.

References

  1. Acker, Joan. 2006. Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender and Society 20 (4): 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atzeni, Maurizio, ed. 2012. Alternative work organizations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Atzeni, Maurizio, and Pablo Ghigliani. 2007. Labour process and decision-making in factories under workers’ self-management: Empirical evidence from Argentina. Work, Employment and Society 21 (4): 653–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atzeni, Maurizio, and Marcelo Vieta. 2014. Between class and the market: Self-management in theory and in the practice of worker-recuperated enterprises in Argentina. In The Routledge Companion to Alternative Organization, eds. Martin Parker, George E. Cheney, Valérie Fournier, and Chris Land, 71–87. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Avent-Holt, Dustin, and Donald Tomaskovic-Devey. 2010. The relational basis of inequality: Generic and contingent wage distribution processes. Work and Occupations 37 (2): 162–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azzellini, Dario. 2012. From cooperatives to enterprises of direct social property in the Venezuelan process. In Cooperatives and Socialism: A View from Cuba, ed. Camila Piñeiro Harnecker, 259–278. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Azzellini, Dario, ed. 2015. An alternative labour history: Worker control and workplace democracy. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  8. Baron, James N., and William T. Bielby. 1980. Bringing the firms back in: Stratification, segmentation, and the organization of work. American Sociological Review 45 (5): 737–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartlett, Will, John Cable, Saul Estrin, Derek C. Jones, and Stephen C. Smith. 1992. Labor-managed cooperatives and private firms in north central Italy: An empirical comparison. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 46 (1): 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burdín, Gabriel. 2016. Equality under threat by the talented: Evidence from worker-managed firms. The Economic Journal 126 (594): 1372–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Becker, Howard S. 1970. Sociological work: Methods and substance. Chicago: Adline.Google Scholar
  12. Burawoy, Michael. 1983. Between labor process and the state: The changing face of factory regimes under advanced capitalism. American Sociological Review 48 (5): 587–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burawoy, Michael. 2003. Revisits: An outline of a theory of reflexive ethnography. American Sociological Review 68 (5): 645–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Calloway, Cecilia. 2013. Los tres momentos de la autorregulación en fábricas y empresas recuperadas. Revista Del Observatorio Social Sobre Empresas Recuperadas y Autogestionadas (OSERA) 8.Google Scholar
  15. Calloway, Cecilia, Bruno Colombari, and Santiago Iorio. 2013. Invenciones y resistencias: Construyendo autogestión en las fábricas y empresas recuperadas. Revista del Observatorio Social Sobre Empresas Recuperadas y Autogestionadas (OSERA) 8.Google Scholar
  16. Cancian, Francesca M. 1995. Truth and goodness: Does the sociology of inequality promote social betterment? Sociological Perspectives 38 (3): 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cancino, Alejandra. 2013. Laid-off workers form co-op to open Chicago window plant. Chicago Tribune, May 9. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-05-09/business/ct-biz-0509-windows-workers-20130509_1_window-factory-laid-off-workers-manufacturing-workers. Accessed 1 April 2019.
  18. Cheney, George. 1999. Values at work: Employee participation meets market pressure at Mondragón. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Cheney, George, Iñaki Santa Cruz, Ana María Peredo, and Elías Nazareno. 2014. Worker cooperatives as an organizational alternative: Challenges, achievements and promise in business governance and ownership. Organization 21 (5): 591–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Correll, Shelley J., Erin L. Kelly, Lindsey Trimble O’Connor, and Joan C. Williams. 2014. Redesigning, redefining work. Work and Occupations 41 (1): 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Curl, John. 2010. The cooperative movement in century 21. Affinities: A Journal of Radical Theory, Culture, and Action 4(1). https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/affinities/article/view/6146.
  22. Desmond, Matthew. 2014. Relational ethnography. Theory and Society 43 (5): 547–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DiPrete, Thomas A., and Brittany Fox-Williams. 2018. The Relevance of Inequality Research in Sociology for Inequality Reduction. Columbia University: Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  24. Dow, Gregory K. 2003. Governing the firm: Workers’ control in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ellerman, David. 1984. Worker cooperatives: The question of legal structure. In Worker Cooperatives in America, eds. Robert Jackall and Henry M. Levin, 257–274. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ellerman, David. 1990. The democratic worker-owned firm: A new model for the East and West. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Emerson, Robert M., Rachel I. Fretz, and Linda L. Shaw. 1995. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1997. Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology 103 (2): 281–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fajn, Gabriel. 2003. Fábricas y empresas recuperadas: Protesta social, autogestión y rupturas en la subjetividad. Buenos Aires: Centro Cultural de la Cooperación, Instituto Movilizador de Fondos Cooperativos.Google Scholar
  30. Fajn, Gabriel and Julián Rebón. 2005. El taller ¿sin cronómetro? Apuntes acerca de las empresas recuperadas. Revista Herramienta 28. https://www.herramienta.com.ar/articulo.php?id=300.
  31. Fernández Álvarez, María Inés. 2005. Proceso de trabajo y fábricas recuperadas: Algunas reflexiones a partir de un caso de la ciudad de Buenos Aires. LabourAgain Publications. http://www.iisg.nl/labouragain/documents/fernandez-alvarez.pdf.
  32. Fernández Álvarez, María Inés. 2016. Productive work as political action: Daily practices of struggle and work in a recovered factory. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 21 (2): 254–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fernández Álvarez, María Inés, and Florencia Partenio. 2010. Empresas recuperadas en Argentina: Producciones, espacios y tiempos de género. Tabula Rasa-Revista de Humanidades 12: 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Flecha, Ramón, and Pun Ngai. 2014. The challenge for Mondragon: Searching for the cooperative values in times of internationalization. Organization 21 (5): 666–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gorman, Elizabeth H. 2005. Gender stereotypes, same-gender preferences, and organizational variation in the hiring of women: Evidence from law firms. American Sociological Review 70 (4): 702–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Greenberg, Edward S. 1984. Producer cooperatives and democratic theory: The case of the Plywood Firms. In Worker Cooperatives in America, ed. Robert Jackall and Henry M. Levin, 171–214. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  37. Harris, Scott R. 2003. Studying equality/inequality: Naturalist and constructionist approaches to equality in marriage. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 32 (2): 200–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harris, Scott R. 2006. Social constructionism and social inequality: An introduction to a special issue of JCE. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35 (3): 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harvey, David. 2014. Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Henriques, Flávio Chedid, Vanessa Moreira Sígolo, Sandra Rufino, Fernanda Santos Araújo, Vicente Nepomuceno, Mariana Baptista Girotto, Maria Alejandra Paulucci, Thiago Nogueira Rodrigues, Maíra Rocha Cavalcanti, and Maurício Sardá de Faria. 2013. Empresas recuperadas por trabalhadores no Brasil: Resultados de um levantamento nacional. Rio de Janeiro: Editorial Multifoco.Google Scholar
  41. Heras-Saizarbitoria, Iñaki. 2014. The ties that bind? Exploring the basic principles of worker-owned organizations in practice. Organization 21 (5): 645–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hirtz, Natalia Vanesa, and Marta Susana Giacone. 2013. The recovered companies workers’ struggle in Argentina: Between autonomy and new forms of control. Latin American Perspectives 40 (4): 88–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jerolmack, Colin, and Alexandra K. Murphy. 2017. The ethical dilemmas and social scientific trade-offs of masking in ethnography. Sociological Methods & Research.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117701483.
  44. Kalev, Alexandra. 2009. Cracking the glass cages? Restructuring and ascriptive inequality at work. American Journal of Sociology 114 (6): 1591–1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kalev, Alexandra, Frank Dobbin, and Erin Kelly. 2006. Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review 71 (4): 589–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Katz, Jack. 2001. From how to why: On luminous description and causal inference in ethnography (part 1). Ethnography 2 (4): 443–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Katz, Jack. 2002. From how to why: On luminous description and causal inference in ethnography (part 2). Ethnography 3 (1): 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kelly, Erin L., Samantha K. Ammons, Kelly Chermack, and Phyllis Moen. 2010. Gendered challenge, gendered response: Confronting the ideal worker norm in a white-collar organization. Gender and Society 24 (3): 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kleinman, Sherryl. 1996. Opposing ambitions: Gender and identity in an alternative organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Kokkinidis, George. 2015. Spaces of possibilities: Workers’ self-management in Greece. Organization 22 (6): 847–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lamont, Michèle, Stefan Beljean, and Matthew Clair. 2014. What is missing? Cultural processes and causal pathways to inequality. Socioeconomic Review 12 (3): 573–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Larrabure, Manuel, Marcelo Vieta, and Daniel Schugurensky. 2011. The “new cooperativism” in Latin America: Worker-recuperated enterprises and socialist production units. Studies in the Education of Adults 43 (2): 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Leidner, Robin. 1991. Serving hamburgers and selling insurance: Gender, work, and identity in interactive service jobs. Gender and Society 5 (2): 154–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Magnani, Esteban. 2003. El cambio silencioso: Empresas y fábricas recuperadas por sus trabajadores en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros.Google Scholar
  55. Magne, Nathalie. 2017. Wage inequality in workers’ cooperatives and conventional firms. The European Journal of Comparative Economics 14 (2): 303–319.Google Scholar
  56. Martin, Patricia Y. 1990. Rethinking feminist organizations. Gender and Society 4 (2): 182–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Martin, Patricia Yancey and Myra Marx Ferree, eds. 1995. Feminist organizations: Harvest of the new women’s movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Massey, Douglas S. 2007. Categorically unequal: The American stratification system. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  59. Minujin, Alberto, and Gabriel Kessler. 1995. La nueva pobreza en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Editorial Planeta.Google Scholar
  60. Moeran, Brian. 2009. From participant observation to observant participation. In Organizational Ethnography: Studying the Complexities of Everyday Life, ed. Sierk Ybema, Dvora Yanow, Harry Wels, and Frans H. Kamsteeg, 139–155. London: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Morrill, Calvin, and Gary A. Fine. 1997. Ethnographic contributions to organizational sociology. Sociological Methods & Research 25 (4): 424–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ng, Catherine W., and Evelyn Ng. 2009. Balancing the democracy dilemmas: Experiences of three women workers’ cooperatives in Hong Kong. Economic and Industrial Democracy 30 (2): 182–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ness, Immanuel, and Dario Azzellini, eds. 2011. Ours to master and to own: Workers’ control from the Commune to the present. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
  64. Novkovic, Sonja. 2008. Defining the co-operative difference. The Journal of Socio-Economics 37 (6): 2168–2177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Otis, Eileen. 2011. Markets and bodies: Women, service work and the making of inequality in China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Palomino, Héctor, Ivanna Bleynat, Silvia Garro, and Carla Giacomuzzi. 2010. The universe of worker-recovered companies in Argentina (2002-2008): Continuity and changes inside the movement. Affinities: A Journal of Radical Theory, Culture, and Action 4 (1).Google Scholar
  67. Parker, Martin, George Cheney, Valerie Fournier, and Chris Land, eds. 2014. The Routledge companion to alternative organization. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pateman, Carole. 1989. The disorder of women: Democracy, feminism, and political theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Pencavel, John. 2002. Worker participation: Lessons from worker co-ops of the pacific northwest. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  71. Perlow, Leslie A., and Erin L. Kelly. 2014. Toward a model of work redesign for better work and better life. Work and Occupations 41 (1): 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pierucci, Fabián, and Federico Tonarelli. 2014. Cooperativa de trabajo Hotel B.A.U.E.N.: Una experiencia de autogestión y libertad. In Crisis y autogestión en el siglo XX: Cooperativas y empresas recuperadas en tiempos de neoliberalismo, eds. Andrés Ruggeri, Henrique T. Novaes, and Maurício Sardá de Faria, 149–160. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Continente.Google Scholar
  73. Pizzi, Alejandro, and Ignasi B. Icart. 2014. Autogestión obrera y movilización social: El caso de las empresas recuperadas argentinas en la ciudad de Buenos Aires y provincia de Buenos Aires. Latin American Research Review 49 (1): 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Polletta, Francesca. 2002. Freedom is an endless meeting: Democracy in American social movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Pozzi, Pablo, and Fabio Nigra. 2015. Argentina a decade after the collapse: The causes of the crisis and structural changes. Latin American Perspectives 42 (1): 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Programa Facultad Abierta. 2010. Las empresas recuperadas en la Argentina, 2010: Informe del tercer relevamiento de empresas recuperadas por sus trabajadores. Buenos Aires: University of Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  77. Programa Facultad Abierta. 2018. Las empresas recuperadas por los trabajadores en el gobierno de Mauricio Macri: Estado de situación a octubre de 2018. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  78. Ragin, Charles C., and Howard S. Becker, eds. 1992. What is a case?: Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Ranis, Peter. 2016. Cooperatives confront capitalism. Chicago: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  80. Rao, Hayagreeva, Calvin Morrill, and Mayer N. Zald. 2000. Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Research in Organizational Behavior 22: 237–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rebón, Julián. 2007. La empresa de la autonomía: Trabajadores recuperando la producción. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Picaso.Google Scholar
  82. Reskin, Barbara. 1993. Sex segregation in the workplace. Annual Review of Sociology 19 (1): 241–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Reskin, Barbara. 2003. Including mechanisms in our models of ascriptive inequality. American Sociological Review 68 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Reyes, Victoria. 2017. Three models of transparency in ethnographic research: Naming places, naming people, and sharing data. Ethnography 19 (2): 204–226Google Scholar
  85. Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 1997. Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. American Sociological Review 62 (2): 218–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2011. Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2014. Why status matters for inequality. American Sociological Review 79 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rieiro, Anabel. 2016. Worker-owned organization in the southern cone of Latin America: Moral economies, economic moralities. Berkeley: Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics (SASE).Google Scholar
  89. Ríos, Tania, and Johnny Picone. 2010. Empresas recuperadas de la república Bolivariana de Venezuela: una realidad compleja y un desafío liberador. Revista del Observatorio Social Sobre Empresas Recuperadas y Autogestionadas (OSERA) 4.Google Scholar
  90. Risman, Barbara J. 2004. Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender and Society 18 (4): 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rivera, Lauren A. 2012. Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. American Sociological Review 77 (6): 999–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Roscigno, Vincent J. 2011. Power, revisited. Social Forces 90 (2): 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rothschild-Whitt, Joyce. 1979. The collectivist organization: An alternative to rational-bureaucratic models. American Sociological Review 44 (4): 509–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Rothschild, Joyce, and J. Allen Whitt. 1986. The cooperative workplace: Potentials and dilemmas of organizational democracy and participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Ruggeri, Andrés, Desiderio Alfonso, and Emiliano Balaguer. 2017. BAUEN: El Hotel de Los Trabajadores. Buenos Aires: Callao Cooperativa Cultural. Biblioteca Economía de los Trabajadores.Google Scholar
  96. Ruggeri, Andrés, and Marcelo Vieta. 2015. Argentina’s worker-recuperated enterprises, 2010–2013: A synthesis of recent empirical findings. Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity 4 (41): 75–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Salgado, Rodrigo M. 2012. Aportes para el análisis de los procesos de desigualación distributiva en las empresas recuperadas de la ciudad de Buenos Aires. Argumentos: Revista de Crítica Social 14: 207–239.Google Scholar
  98. Schoening, Joel. 2005. Cooperative entrepreneurialism: Reconciling democratic values with business demands at a worker-owned firm. Research in the Sociology of Work 16: 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Schwalbe, Michael, Sandra Godwin, Daphne Holden, Douglas Schrock, Shealy Thompson, and Michele Wolkomir. 2000. Generic processes in the reproduction of inequality: An interactionist analysis. Social Forces 79 (2): 419–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Sherman, Rachel. 2007. Class acts: Service and inequality in luxury hotels. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  101. Sørensen, Aage B. 2000. Toward a sounder basis for class analysis. American Journal of Sociology 105 (6): 1523–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sobering, Katherine. 2016. Producing and reducing gender inequality in a worker-recovered cooperative. The Sociological Quarterly 57 (1): 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sobering, Katherine. 2019. Watercooler democracy: Rumors and transparency in a cooperative workplace. Work and Occupations Online first.Google Scholar
  104. Sobering, Katherine, Jessica Thomas, and Christine L. Williams. 2014. Gender in/equality in worker-owned businesses. Sociology Compass 8 (11): 1242–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Steinberg, Ronnie J. 1990. Social construction of skill: Gender, power, and comparable worth. Work and Occupations 17 (4): 449–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Tilly, Charles. 1998. Durable inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  107. Tilly, Chris, and Charles Tilly. 1997. Work under capitalism. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  108. Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald. 1993. Gender and racial inequality at work: The sources and consequences of job segregation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald. 2014. The relational generation of workplace inequalities. Social Currents 1 (1): 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald, and Dustin Avent-Holt. 2019. Relational inequalities: An organizational approach. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Vallas, Steven, and Emily Cummins. 2014. Relational models of organizational inequalities: Emerging approaches and conceptual dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist 58 (2): 228–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Vanek, Jaroslav. 1970. The general theory of labor-management market economics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  113. Vieta, Marcelo. 2010a. The new cooperativism. Affinities: A Journal of Radical Theory, Culture, and Action 4 (1). https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/affinities/article/view/6145
  114. Vieta, Marcelo. 2010b. The social innovations of autogestión in Argentina’s worker-recuperated enterprises. Labor Studies Journal 35 (3): 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Vieta, Marcelo. 2014. Learning in struggle: Argentina’s new worker cooperatives as transformative learning organizations. Relations Industrielles / Industrial Relations 69 (1): 186–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Vieta, Marcelo. 2015. The Italian road to creating worker cooperatives from worker buyouts: Italy’s worker-recuperated enterprises and the Legge Marcora framework. SSRN Scholarly Paper. ID 2641057. Rochester: Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar
  117. Vieta, Marcelo, and Andrés Ruggeri. 2009. Worker-recovered enterprises as workers’ co-operatives: The conjunctures, challenges, and innovations of self-management in Argentina and Latin America. In Co-operatives in a global economy: The challenges of co-operation across borders, eds. Darryl Reed and J.J. McMurtry, 178–225. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
  118. Vieta, Marcelo, and Doug Lionais. 2015. Editorial: The cooperative advantage for community development. Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity 4 (1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Warhurst, Chris, Chris Tilly, and Mary Gatta. 2017. A new social construction of skill. In The Oxford Handbook of Skills and Training, ed. John Buchanan, David Finegold, Ken Mayhew, and Chris Warhurst, 72–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  120. Weeden, Kim A. 2002. Why do some occupations pay more than others? Social closure and earnings inequality in the United States. American Journal of Sociology 108 (1): 55–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Whyte, William F., and Katherine K. Whyte. 1991. Making Mondragón: The growth and dynamics of the worker cooperative complex. Ithaca: ILR Press.Google Scholar
  122. Wright, Erik O. 1994. Interrogating inequality: Essays on class analysis, socialism and Marxism. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  123. Wright, Erik O. 1997. Class counts: Comparative studies in class analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  124. Wright, Erik O. 2010. Envisioning real utopias. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  125. Zelizer, Viviana A. 1989. The social meaning of money: “Special monies”. American Journal of Sociology 95 (2): 342–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations