Advertisement

Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 663–686 | Cite as

Between Church and State: a Christian Brotherhood’s Faithful Claims to Secularity in Mexico City

  • Graham W. HillEmail author
Article

Abstract

The Good News Businessmen’s Brotherhood (GNBB) is a Christian organization with evangelical commitments, charismatic practices, and whose members insist that their organization is secular. How are we to understand such a Christian claim to secularity? Members of GNBB draw on the multiple overlapping meanings of the secular in order to reach otherwise inaccessible places and audiences, but they also do so in an attempt to disavow conventional religious-secular distinctions. The GNBB claim to secularity is, therefore, an everyday life instantiation of two kinds of recent scholarly criticism: the secular injunction to separate religion from politics is a practical impossibility; and the apparent neutrality of secularism’s public/private and church/world distinctions masks an underlying affinity with a Protestant Christian worldview. Good News brothers’ everyday intertwining of faith and politics mirrors these scholarly critiques, with the exception that, where the latter finds grounds for criticism, the former find practical possibilities for building a project.

Keywords

Secularism Religion Latin America Ethnography 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Earlier versions of this article were presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association and the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion. I would like to thank Dylan Riley, Cihan Tugal, Margaret Chowning, Cristina Mora, Kim Voss, Cybelle Fox, Mara Loveman, Christian Joppke, Ruth Braunstien, John O’Brien, Anthony Stavrianakis, Bharat Venkat, Edwin Ackerman, Jonah Stuart Brundage, William Welsh, Michel Estefan, Ben Shestakofsky, and Kate Maich, as well as the editors and reviewers at Qualitative Sociology for their comments and suggestions. I would also like to thank UC MEXUS and the Berkeley Center for the Study of Religion for their financial support of my fieldwork.

References

  1. Aguilar Camín, Héctor. 1993. La invención de México. Nexos 187: 49–61.Google Scholar
  2. Ammerman, Nancy. 2013. Spiritual but not religious? Beyond binary choices in the study of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52 (2): 258–278.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asad, Talal. 2003. Formations of the secular. Stanford: Standford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-003-0179-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aspe, María Luisa. 2008. La formación social y política de los católicos mexicanos: La Acción Católica Mexicana y la Unión Nacional de Estudiantes Católicos, 1929–1958. Ciudad de México: Universidad Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
  5. Bhambra, Gurminder. 2017. Brexit, Trump, and ‘methodological whiteness’: On the misrecognition of race and class. The British Journal of Sociology 68 (1): 214–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barranco, Benardo. [1996] 2011. Posiciones políticas en la historia de la Acción Católica Mexicana. In El pensamiento social de los católicos mexicanos; Blancarte (ed). Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  7. Barrios, José Luis, and Carl Good. 2001. Iconographies of past and present: Visual constructions of power in post-PRI Mexico. Discourse 23 (2): 26–43.Google Scholar
  8. Bastian, Jean-Pierre. 1990. Protestantes, liberales y francmasones: Sociedades de ideas y modernidad en América Latina, siglo XIX. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  9. Baubérot, Jean. 2015. Les sept laïcités françaises. Paris: Éditions de la maison des sciences de l’homme.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bender, Courtney. 2010. The new metaphysicals: Spirituality and the American religious imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berezin, Mabel. 2009. Illiberal politics in neoliberal times: Culture, security and populism in the new Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Berezin, Mabel. 2017. On the construction sites of history: Where did Donald Trump come from? American Journal of Cultural Sociology 5 (3): 322–337.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-017-0045-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bielo, James. 2009. Words upon the word: An ethnography of evangelical group bible study. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Blancarte, Roberto. 1993. Recent changes in church-state relations in Mexico: A historical approach. Journal of Church and State 35 (4): 781–805.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jcs/35.4.781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blancarte, Roberto. 2000. Retos y perspectivas de la laicidad Mexicana. In Laicidad y valores en un Estado democrático, ed. Roberto Blancarte, 117–139. Ciudad de México: El Colegio de México, A.C., Secretaría de Gobernación.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Blancarte, Roberto. 2001. Laicidad y secularización en México. Estudios Sociológicos 19 (57): 843–855.Google Scholar
  17. Blancarte, Roberto. 2013. Laicidad en México. In Para entender y pensar la laicidad, eds. Pedro Salazar Ugarte and Pauline Capdevielle, 183–249. Ciudad de México: Universidad Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  18. Blancarte, Roberto. 2015. ¿Por qué la religión ‘regresó’ a la esfera pública en un mundo secularizado? Estudios Sociológicos XXXIII (9): 659–673.Google Scholar
  19. Blankholm, Joseph. 2014. The political advantages of a polysemous secular. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 53 (4): 775–790.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Blankholm, Joseph. 2018. Secularism and secular people. Public Culture 30 (2): 245–268.  https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-4310874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brubaker, Rogers. 2017. Why populism? Theory and Society 46: 357–385.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cady, Linell, and Elizabeth Shakman Hurd. 2010. Introduction. In Comparative secularisms in a global age, eds. Linell E. Cady and Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, 3–24. New York: Palgrave Macmillion.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Casanova, Jose. 1994. Public religions in the modern world. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(94)90124-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Casanova, Jose. 2009. The secular and secularisms. Social Research 74 (4): 1049–1066.Google Scholar
  25. Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Connolly, William. 2000. Why I am not a secularist. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  27. Davis, Nancy, and Robert Robinson. 2012. Claiming society for God: Religious movements and social welfare. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  28. De la Torre, Renee, and Cristina Gutiérrez. 2014. La religión en el censo: Recurso para la construcción de una cultura de pluralidad religiosa en México. Revista Cultura y Religión 8 (2): 166–196.Google Scholar
  29. De Roover, Jakob. 2011. Secular law and the realm of false religion. In After secular law, eds. Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, Robert A. Yelle, and Mateo Taussig-Rubbo, 43–61. Stanford: Stanford Law Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Engelke, Matthew. 2009. Strategic secularism: Biblical advocacy in England. Social Analysis 53 (1): 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Engelke, Matthew. 2013. God’s agents: Biblical publicity in contemporary England. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fallow, Ben. 2009. Varieties of Mexican revolutionary anticlericalism: Radicalism, iconoclasm, and otherwise, 1914–1935. The Americas 65 (4): 481–509.  https://doi.org/10.1353/tam.0.0106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fitzgerald, Timothy. 2007. Encompassing religion, privatized religion and the invention of modern politics. In Religion and the secular, ed. Timothy Fitzgerald, 211–240. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  34. Fuller, Robert. 2001. Spiritual but not religious: Understanding unchurched America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142727.mb1109s01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Freston, Paul. 2001. Evangelicals and politics in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.49.5.616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Freston, Paul. 2008. Evangelical Christianity and democracy in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Glaser, Barney, and Anselm Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
  38. Gorski, Philip. 2000. Historicizing the secularization debate: church, state, and society in late medieval and early modern Europe, ca 1300 to 1700. American Sociological Review 65: 138–167.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2657295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gorski, Philip. 2010. Civil Religion Today (ARDA Guiding Paper Series). State College: The Association of Religion Data Archives at The Pennsylvania State University, from http://www.thearda.com/rrh/papers/guidingpapers.asp. Accessed Oct 2017.
  40. Gorski, Philip. 2017. Why evangelicals voted for Trump: A critical cultural sociology. American Journal of Cultural Sociology 5 (3): 338–354.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-017-0043-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Habermas, Jurgen. 2008. Notes on a post-secular society. New Perspectives Quarterly 25: 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hill, Graham. 2019. Laicidad y religiosidad: Conceptos opuestos entremezclados. Colección Cuadernos Jorge Carpizo, Cuaderno 34. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  43. Hochschild, Arlie. 2016a. Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  44. Hochschild, Arlie. 2016b. The ecstatic edge of politics: Sociology and Donald Trump. Contemporary Sociology 45 (6): 683–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hollinger, David. 1996. Science, Jews and secular culture: Studies in mid-twentieth-century American intellectual history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman. 2008. The politics of secularism in international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Inglehart, Ronald & Pippa Norris. 2016. Trump, Brexit, and the rise of Populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash. Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper Series. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2818659. Accessed Aug 2018,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.10.021.
  48. Innerarity, Daniel. 2010. The transformation of politics: Governing in the age of complex societies. Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  49. Jakobsen, Janet R., and Ann Pellegrini. 2008. Introduction: Times like these. In Secularisms, eds. Janet R. Jakobsen and Ann Pellegrini. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kettell, Stephen. 2014. Divided we stand: The politics of the atheist movement in the United States. Journal of Contemporary Religion 29 (3): 377–391.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2014.945722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Knight, Alan. 1994. Peasants into patriots: Thoughts on the making of the Mexican nation. Mexican Studies 10 (1): 135–161.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1051969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kucinskas, Jaime. 2014. The unobtrusive tactics of religious movements. Sociology of Religion 75 (4): 537–550.  https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/sru055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Laborde, Cecile. 2017. Liberalism’s religion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Levine, Daniel. 2009. The Future of Christianity in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies 41: 121–145.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X08005130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lichterman, Paul, and Isaac Reed. 2014. Theory and contrastive explanation in ethnography. Sociological Methods & Research 44 (4): 585–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lomnitz, Claudio. 2001. Deep Mexico, silent Mexico. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  57. Luhrmann, Tanya. 2012. When God talks back: Understanding the American evangelical experience. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  58. Maclure, Jocelyn, and Charles Taylor. 2011. Secularism and freedom of conscience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mahmood, Saba. 2016. Religious difference in a secular age: A minority report. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mallon, Florencia. 1995. Peasant and nation: The making of postcolonial Mexico and Peru. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  61. Martí, Gerardo, and Gladys Ganiel. 2014. The deconstructed church: Understanding emerging Christianity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McGreevy, John. 2003. Catholicism and American freedom: A history. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  63. Meyer, Jean. [1976] 2008. The Cristero rebellion: The Mexican people between church and state 1926–1929. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Montes, Rodolfo. 2011. La cruzada de Calderón. Mexico City: Penguin/Random House.Google Scholar
  65. Moore, Rick. 2017. Fast or slow: Sociological implications of measuring dual-process cognition. Sociological Science 4: 196–223.  https://doi.org/10.15195/v4.a9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Niose, David. 2012. Nonbeliever nation: The rise of secular Americans. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  67. Peñas Defago, María Angélica, and José Manuel Morán Faundes. 2015. Nuevas configuraciones religiosas/seculares las ONG “pro-vida” en las disputas por las políticas sexuales en Argentina. Religião & Sociedade 35 (2): 340–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Smith, Christian. 1998. American evangelicalism: Embattled and thriving. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stack, Trevor. 2007. A higher ground: The secular knowledge of objects of religious devotion. In Religion and the Secular, ed. Timothy Fitzgerald, 47–70. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  70. Sullivan, Winnifred. 2005. The impossibility of religious freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Sullivan, Winnifred. 2009. Prison religion: Faith-based reform and the Constitution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sullivan, Winnifred. 2015. The ministry of presence: Chaplaincy, spiritual care, and the law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  73. Taylor, Charles. 1998. Modes of secularism. In Secularism and its critics, ed. Rajeev Bhargava, 31–53. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Taylor, Charles. 2009. The polysemy of the secular. Social Research 76 (4): 1143–1166.Google Scholar
  75. Taylor, Charles. 2011. The power of religion in the public sphere; eds. Eduardo Mendieta and Jonathan Vanantwerpen. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Timmermans, Stefan, and Iddo Tavory. 2009. Two cases of ethnography: Grounded theory and the extended case method. Ethnography 10 (3): 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Timmermans, Stefan, and Iddo Tavory. 2012. Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory 30: 167–186.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tormey, Simon. 2015. The end of representative politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  79. Urbinati, Nadia. 2015. A revolt against intermediary bodies. Constellations 22 (4): 477–486.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vaggione, Juan Marco. 2005. Reactive politicization and religious dissidence: The political mutations of the religious. Social Theory and Practice 31 (2): 233–255.  https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200531210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vargas, Jorge. 1998. Freedom of religion and public worship in Mexico: A legal commentary on the 1992 Federal Act on Religious Matters. BYU Law Review. Iss. 2/6, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199815040-00011.
  82. Wenger, Tina. 2010. The God-in-the-Constitution controversy. In Comparative secularisms in a global age, eds. Linell E. Cady and Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, 3–24. New York: Palgrave Macmillion.Google Scholar
  83. Wuthnow, Robert. 1998. After heaven: Spirituality in America since the 1950s. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Yelle, Robert. 2011. Moses’ veil: Secularization as Christian myth. In After Secular Law, eds. Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, Robert A. Yelle, and Mateo Taussig-Rubbo, 23–42. Stanford: Stanford Law Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of SociologyUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.Groupe Sociétés, Religions, Laïcités (GSRL EPHE PSL)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations