Advertisement

Public Choice

, Volume 180, Issue 3–4, pp 407–427 | Cite as

Intra-party politics and interest groups: missing links in explaining government effectiveness

  • Andrea CeronEmail author
  • Luigi Curini
  • Fedra Negri
Article

Abstract

The article sheds light on two missing links in the existing literature on government’s policy preferences and policy choices, namely the roles played by party factions and trade unions as political actors able to affect government’s decision-making power. The content analysis of a wide typology of documents (i.e., investiture speeches, parliamentary debates, motions discussed during parties’ and trade unions’ congresses) allows to locate cabinets, parties, party factions and trade unions on a common pro-state/pro-market scale. Using these new data sources, we perform a multivariate time-series analysis to estimate the relative impact of those political actors on social expenditure in Italy throughout its modern history (1946–2015). The results support the idea that intra-party dynamics and trade unions’ preferences do matter. Indeed, government’s ability to retrench the welfare state vanishes when the Prime Minister’s party is highly polarized internally and when trade unions are more cohesive.

Keywords

Government partisanship Intra-party politics Trade unions Parliamentary speeches Social expenditure 

JEL Classification

D72 E62 H53 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Fabio Franchino and Robert Franzese for their helpful comments and suggestions. An early version of this paper has been presented at the II International Conference on Public Policy (2015) in Milan, at the VI General Conference of the European Political Science Association (2016) in Brussels and at the General Conference of the Italian Political Science Association (2016) in Milan. We thank the discussants and the participants for their comments.

Supplementary material

11127_2019_644_MOESM1_ESM.docx (430 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 429 kb)

References

  1. Alesina, A., & Drazen, A. (1991). Why are stabilizations delayed. American Economic Review, 81(5), 1170–1188.Google Scholar
  2. Allan, J. P., & Scruggs, L. (2004). Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science, 48(3), 496–512.Google Scholar
  3. Allern, E. H., & Bale, T. (Eds.). (2017). Left-of-centre parties and trade unions in the twenty-first century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Armingeon, K., & Bonoli, G. (2006). The politics of post-industrial welfare states: Adapting post-war social policies to new social risks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Avdagic, S. (2010). When are concerted reforms feasible? Explaining the emergence of social pacts in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 43(5), 628–657.Google Scholar
  6. Baccaro, L., & Lim, S. (2007). Social pacts as coalitions of the weak and moderate: Ireland, Italy and South Korea in comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 13(1), 27–46.Google Scholar
  7. Baccaro, L., & Simoni, M. (2008). Policy concertation in Europe: Understanding government choice. Comparative Political Studies, 41(10), 1323–1348.Google Scholar
  8. Bäck, H., & Debus, M. (2016). Political parties, parliaments and legislative speechmaking. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Bäck, H., Müller, W. C., & Nyblade, B. (2017). Multiparty government and economic policy-making. Coalition agreements, prime ministerial power and spending in Western European Cabinets. Public Choice, 170(1–2), 33–62.Google Scholar
  10. Balassone, F., & Giordano, R. (2001). Budget deficits and coalition governments. Public Choice, 106(3–4), 327–349.Google Scholar
  11. Benoit, K., & Herzog, A. (2017). Text analysis: Estimating policy preferences from written and spoken words. In J. Bachner, K. Wagner Hill, & B. Ginsberg (Eds.), Analytics, policy and governance (pp. 137–159). Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bernauer, J., & Bräuninger, T. (2009). Intra-party preference heterogeneity and faction membership in the 15th German Bundestag: A computational text analysis of parliamentary speeches. German Politics, 18(3), 385–402.Google Scholar
  13. Bevan, S., & Greene, Z. (2015). Looking for the party? Partisan effects on issue attention in UK acts of parliament. European Political Science Review, 8(1), 49–72.Google Scholar
  14. Bjedov, T., Lapointe, S., & Madiès, T. (2014). The impact of within-party and between-party ideological dispersion on fiscal outcomes: Evidence from Swiss cantonal parliaments. Public Choice, 161(1–2), 209–232.Google Scholar
  15. Blais, A., Blake, D., & Dion, S. (1993). Do parties make a difference? Parties and the size of government in liberal democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 40–62.Google Scholar
  16. Boucek, F. (2012). Factional politics. How dominant parties implode or stabilize. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  17. Braüninger, T. (2005). A partisan model of government expenditure. Public Choice, 125(3), 409–429.Google Scholar
  18. Broadberry, S., Giordano, C., & Zollino, F. (2011). A sectoral analysis of Italy’s development: 1861–2010. In Presented at the conference ‘Italy and the world economy, 1861–2011’, Rome, Banca d’Italia, 12–15 October 2011, economic history working papers no. 20.Google Scholar
  19. Budge, I., Klingemann, H., Volkens, A., Bara, J., & Tanenbaum, E. (2001). Mapping policy preferences, estimates for parties, governments and electors 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Castater, E. G., & Han, K. J. (2016). Deal or no deal: Why do social pact proposals fail? West European Politics, 39(6), 1251–1275.Google Scholar
  21. Ceron, A. (2012). Bounded oligarchy: How and when factions constrain leaders in party position-taking. Electoral Studies, 31(4), 689–701.Google Scholar
  22. Ceron, A. (2014). Gamson rule not for all. Patterns of portfolio allocation among Italian party factions. European Journal of Political Research, 53(1), 180–199.Google Scholar
  23. Ceron, A. (2019). Leaders, factions and the game of intra-party politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Ceron, A., & Negri, F. (2017). Trade unions and political parties in Italy (1946–2014): Ideological positions and critical junctures. South European Society and Politics, 22(4), 491–508.Google Scholar
  25. Ceron, A., & Negri, F. (2018). March divided, fight united? Trade union cohesion and government appeal for concertation. West European Politics, 41(1), 218–239.Google Scholar
  26. Clayton, R., & Pontusson, J. (1998). Welfare-state retrenchment revisited: Entitlement cuts, public sector restructuring, and inegalitarian trends in advanced capitalist societies. World Politics, 51(1), 67–98.Google Scholar
  27. Colombo, E., Tirelli, P., & Visser, J. (2014). Reinterpreting social pacts: Theory and evidence. Journal of Comparative Economics, 42(2), 358–374.Google Scholar
  28. Compston, H. W. (2003). Beyond corporatism: A configurational theory of policy concertation. European Journal of Political Research, 42(6), 787–809.Google Scholar
  29. Culpepper, P. D. (2002). Powering, puzzling, and “pacting”. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(5), 774–790.Google Scholar
  30. Culpepper, P. D., & Regan, A. (2014). Why don’t governments need trade unions anymore? The death of social pacts in Ireland and Italy. Socio-Economic Review, 12(4), 723–745.Google Scholar
  31. Cusack, T. R. (1997). Partisan politics and public finance: Changes in public spending in the industrialized democracies, 1955–1989. Public Choice, 91(3–4), 375–395.Google Scholar
  32. Dahl, C. H. (2014). Parties and institutions: Empirical evidence on veto players and the growth of government. Public Choice, 159(3–4), 415–433.Google Scholar
  33. de Haan, J., Sturm, J. E., & Beekhuis, G. (1999). The weak government thesis: Some new evidence. Public Choice, 101(3–4), 163–176.Google Scholar
  34. Debus, M., & Bräuninger, T. (2009). Intra-party factions and coalition bargaining. In D. Giannetti & K. Benoit (Eds.), Intra-party politics and coalition government (pp. 121–145). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Dolezal, M., Ennser-Jedenastik, L., Müller, W. C., et al. (2012). The life cycle of party manifestos: The Austrian case. West European Politics, 35(4), 869–895.Google Scholar
  36. Döring, H., & Schwander, H. (2015). Revisiting the left cabinet share: How to measure the partisan profile of governments in welfare state research. Journal of European Social Policy, 25(2), 175–193.Google Scholar
  37. Elgie, R., & McMenamin, I. (2008). Political fragmentation, fiscal deficits and political institutionalisation. Public Choice, 136(3–4), 255–267.Google Scholar
  38. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Giannetti, D., & Benoit, K. (2009). Intra-party politics and coalition government. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Giannetti, D., & Laver, M. (2009). Party cohesion, party discipline, party factions in Italy. In D. Giannetti & K. Benoit (Eds.), Intra-party politics and coalition government (pp. 146–168). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Greene, Z., & Haber, M. (2016). Leadership competition and disagreement at party national congresses. British Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 611–632.Google Scholar
  42. Hamann, K., Johnston, A., Katsanidou, A., Kelly, J., & Pollock, P. (2015). Sharing the rewards, dividing the costs? The electoral consequences of social pacts and legislative reform in Western Europe. West European Politics, 38(1), 206–227.Google Scholar
  43. Hamann, K., Johnston, A., & Kelly, J. (2013). Unions against governments: Explaining general strikes in Western Europe, 1980–2006. Comparative Political Studies, 46(9), 1030–1057.Google Scholar
  44. Hamann, K., & Kelly, J. (2007). Party politics and the reemergence of social pacts in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 40(8), 971–994.Google Scholar
  45. Hassel, A. (2009). Policies and politics in social pacts in Europe. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 15(1), 17–26.Google Scholar
  46. Häusermann, S., Picot, G., & Geering, D. (2013). Review article: Rethinking party politics and the welfare state. Recent advances in the literature. British Journal of Political Science, 43(1), 221–240.Google Scholar
  47. Hibbs, D. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review, 71(4), 1467–1487.Google Scholar
  48. Hjermitslev, I. B. (2018). The electoral cost of coalition participation: Can anyone escape? Party Politics.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818794216.Google Scholar
  49. Höhmann, D. (2017). The effect of legislature size on public spending: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design. Public Choice, 173(3), 345–367.Google Scholar
  50. Imbeau, L. M., Pétry, F., & Lamari, M. (2001). Left–right party ideology and government policies: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 40(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
  51. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1989). Power and interdependence. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  52. Klüver, H., & Pickup, M. (2019). Are they listening? Public opinion, interest groups and government responsiveness. West European Politics, 42(1), 91–112.Google Scholar
  53. König, T. (2006). The scope for policy change after the 2005 election: Veto players and intra-party decision-making. German Politics, 15(4), 520–532.Google Scholar
  54. Kontopoulos, Y., & Perotti, R. (1999). Government fragmentation and fiscal policy outcomes: Evidence from OECD countries. In J. M. Poterba (Ed.), Fiscal institutions and fiscal performance (pp. 81–102). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Korpi, W., & Palme, J. (2003). New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: Welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–95. American Political Science Review, 97(3), 425–446.Google Scholar
  56. Marlow, M. L., & Orzechowski, W. (1996). Public sector unions and public spending. Public Choice, 89(1–2), 1–16.Google Scholar
  57. Martocchia Diodati, N., Marino, B., & Carlotti, B. (2018). Prime ministers unchained? Explaining prime minister policy autonomy in coalition governments. European Political Science Review.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773918000085.Google Scholar
  58. Mattina, L., & Carrieri, M. (2017). Left-of-centre parties and trade unions in Italy: From party dominance to a dialogue of the deaf. In E. H. Allern & T. Bale (Eds.), Left-of-centre parties and trade unions in the twenty-first century (pp. 170–186). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. McDonald, M. D., & Budge, I. (2005). Elections, parties, democracy. Conferring the median mandate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Mershon, C. (1996). The costs of coalition: Coalition theories and Italian governments. American Political Science Review, 90(3), 534–554.Google Scholar
  61. Mershon, C. (2001). Contending models of portfolio allocation and office payoffs to party factions: Italy 1963–1979. American Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 277–293.Google Scholar
  62. Molina, O., & Rhodes, M. (2002). Corporatism: The past, present, and future of a concept. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 305–331.Google Scholar
  63. Müller, W. C., & Strom, K. (2000). Coalition government in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Natali, D., & Pochet, P. (2009). The evolution of social pacts in the EMU era: What type of institutionalization? European Journal of Industrial Relations, 15(2), 147–166.Google Scholar
  65. Negri F. (2016). Breaking down the chain of responsiveness. Doctoral Thesis.  https://doi.org/10.13130/negri-fedra_phd2016-03-11. Accessed March 11, 2016.
  66. Negri, F. (2017). Who affects government declarations and why: Contrasting the left–right scale with the welfare dimension. Government and Opposition.  https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2017.29.Google Scholar
  67. Nijhuis, D. O. (2009). Revisiting the role of labor: Worker solidarity, employer opposition, and the development of old-age pensions in the Netherlands and United Kingdom. World Politics, 61(2), 296–329.Google Scholar
  68. Oliver, R. J. (2011). Powerful remnants? The politics of egalitarian bargaining institutions in Italy and Sweden. Socio-Economic Review, 9(3), 533–566.Google Scholar
  69. Padovano, F., & Venturi, L. (2001). Wars of attrition in Italian government coalitions and fiscal performance: 1948–1994. Public Choice, 109(1–2), 15–54.Google Scholar
  70. Persico, N., Pueblita, J. C. R., & Silverman, D. (2011). Factions and political competition. Journal of Political Economy, 119(2), 242–288.Google Scholar
  71. Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Thatcher and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Powell, G. B. (2009). The ideological congruence controversy: The impact of alternative measures, data, and time periods on the effects of election rules. Comparative Political Studies, 42(12), 1475–1497.Google Scholar
  73. Proksch, S., & Slapin, J. B. (2012). Institutional foundations of legislative speeches. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 520–537.Google Scholar
  74. Ragioneria Generale dello Stato. (2011). La spesa dello Stato dall’Unità d’Italia. Anni 1862–2009. http://www.rgs.mef.gov.it/_Documenti/VERSIONE-I/Pubblicazioni/Studi-e-do/La-spesa-dello-stato/La_spesa_dello_Stato_dall_unit_d_Italia.pdf. Accessed July 01, 2018.
  75. Rose, R. (1984). Do parties make a difference? (2nd ed.). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  76. Roubini, N., & Sachs, J. D. (1989). Government spending and budget deficits in the industrial economies. NBER working paper number 2919.Google Scholar
  77. Russo, F., & Verzichelli, L. (2016). Government ideology and party priorities: The determinants of public spending changes in Italy. Italian Political Science Review, 46(3), 269–290.Google Scholar
  78. Solé-Ollé, A. (2006). The effects of party competition on budget outcomes: Empirical evidence from local governments in Spain. Public Choice, 126(1–2), 145–176.Google Scholar
  79. Taylor-Gooby, P. (2002). The silver age of the welfare state: Perspectives on resilience. Journal of Social Policy, 31(4), 597–622.Google Scholar
  80. Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton: Princeton University Press/Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  81. Volkerink, B., & de Haan, J. (2001). Fragmented government effects on fiscal policy: New evidence. Public Choice, 109(3–4), 221–242.Google Scholar
  82. Warwick, P. V. (1992). Ideological diversity and government survival in Western European parliamentary democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 25(3), 332–361.Google Scholar
  83. Warwick, P. V. (2011). Voters, parties, and declared government policy. Comparative Political Studies, 44(12), 1675–1699.Google Scholar
  84. Weingast, B. R., Shepsle, K. A., & Johnsen, C. (1981). The political economy of benefits and costs: A neoclassical approach to distributive politics. The Journal of Political Economy, 89(4), 642–664.Google Scholar
  85. Zucchini, F. (2011). Government alternation and legislative agenda setting. European Journal of Political Research, 50(6), 749–774.Google Scholar
  86. Zuckerman, A. (1979). The politics of factions: Christian democratic rule in Italy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations