Advertisement

Progressive Democracy: the ideology of the modern predatory state

  • Randall G. HolcombeEmail author
Article
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

The state must expend resources to credibly threaten the use of force, and the actual use of force is more costly than just exercising the threat. A population that views itself as prey to a predatory state will resist the state’s demands and will not produce much that the state can appropriate. The predatory state will be more successful if it can convince its citizens that the state’s activities are in the public interest, which will enhance voluntary compliance with the state’s mandates and lessen the need for the state to invest resources in overt coercion. The ideology of “Progressive Democracy” encourages citizens to cooperate with the state, and legitimizes the state’s predatory activities. The ideology of Progressivism justifies the imposition of costs on some for the benefit of others. The ideology of democracy implies that when a democratic government does this, it is acting in the public interest.

Keywords

Democracy Progressivism Predatory state Contractarianism Political ideology Politics as exchange 

Notes

References

  1. Anderson, T. L., & Hill, P. J. (1980). The birth of a transfer society. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bailyn, B. (1967). The ideological origins of the American revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bartels, L. M. (2008). Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. New York, Princeton: Russell Sage Foundation; Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beard, C. (1913). An economic interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Black, D. (1958). The theory of committees and elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. (1997). Democracy and decision: The pure theory of electoral preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Buchanan, J. M. (1962). The relevance of Pareto optimality. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 6(4), 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The limits of liberty: Between anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caplan, B. (2007). The myth of the rational voter: Why democracies choose bad public policies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Congleton, R. D. (2011). Perfecting parliament: Constitutional reform, liberalism, and the rise of Western democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  13. Edelman, M. (1964). The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  14. Friedman, D. (1989). The machinery of freedom: A guide to radical capitalism (2nd ed.). La Salle, IL: Open Court Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gilens, M. (2012). Affluence and influence: Economic inequality and political power in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. (2010). Winner-take-all politics: How Washington made the rich richer—and turned its back on the middle class. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  17. Hobbes, T. ([1651] 1950). Leviathan. New York: E.P. Dutton.Google Scholar
  18. Hochman, H. M., & Rodgers, J. D. (1969). Pareto optimal redistribution. American Economic Review, 59(4), 542–557.Google Scholar
  19. Holcombe, R. G. (1994). The economic foundations of government. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holcombe, R. G. (2002). From liberty to democracy: The transformation of American government. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holcombe, R. G. (2018). Political capitalism: How economic and political power is made and maintained. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kolko, G. (1963). The triumph of conservatism: A reinterpretation of American history, 1900–1916. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Krueger, A. O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. American Economic Review, 64, 291–303.Google Scholar
  24. Leeson, P. T. (2012). Ordeals. Journal of Law and Economics, 55(3), 691–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leeson, P. T. (2013a). Vermin trials. Journal of Law and Economics, 56(3), 811–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leeson, P. T. (2013b). “God Damn”: The law and economics of monastic malediction. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 30(1), 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leeson, P. T. (2013c). Gypsy law. Public Choice, 155(3/4), 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leeson, P. T. (2014). Oracles. Rationality and Society, 26(2), 141–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leeson, P. T., & Coyne, C. J. (2012). Sassywood. Journal of Comparative Economics, 40(4), 608–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Levi, M. (1988). Of rule and revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  31. Locke, J. ([1690] 1967). Two treatises of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. McCloskey, D. N. (2006). The bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an age of commerce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  34. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Olson, M. (2000). Power and prosperity: Outgrowing communist and capitalist dictatorships. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment now: The case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  38. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Belknap: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  39. Rothbard, M. N. (1973). For a new liberty. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Rousseau, J. J. (1762). The social contract, or principles of political right (G. D. H. Cole, Trans.). www.constitution.org/jjr/socon.htm.
  41. Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stigler, G. J., & Becker, G. S. (1977). De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review, 67(2), 76–90.Google Scholar
  43. Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers the future. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  44. Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare cost of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Western Economic Journal, 5, 224–232.Google Scholar
  45. Tullock, G. (1971). The charity of the uncharitable. Economic Inquiry, 9(4), 379–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tullock, G. (1983). Economics of income redistribution. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Usher, D. (1992). The welfare economics of markets, voting, and predation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  48. Wittman, D. A. (1989). Why democracies produce efficient results. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1395–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wittman, D. A. (1995). The myth of democratic failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Yeager, L. B. (1985). Rights, contract, and utility in policy espousal. Cato Journal, 5(1), 259–294.Google Scholar
  51. Yeager, L. B. (2001). Ethics as a social science: The moral philosophy of social cooperation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations