Advertisement

Public Choice

, Volume 181, Issue 1–2, pp 71–82 | Cite as

Rent-seeking in the classroom and textbooks: Where are we after 50 years?

  • Joshua HallEmail author
  • Josh Matti
  • Amir B. Ferreira Neto
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we provide an overview of the influence of Tullock’s work on rent-seeking in the area of economics education. After summarizing the basic rent-seeking model in both a domestic and international context, we conduct an analysis of undergraduate and graduate textbooks in public economics. We find a majority of undergraduate texts cover rent-seeking in depth, but two texts provide zero coverage. No graduate textbook surveyed mentions rent-seeking. We conclude by summarizing the economic education literature on rent-seeking, which can be divided into either classroom experiments or popular culture examples.

Keywords

Economics education Rent-seeking Textbooks 

References

  1. Al-Bahrani, A., Holder, K., Patel, D., & Sheridan, B. J. (2016). The great digital divide: Using popular media to teach economics. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 17(2), 105.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K., Bernheim, B. D., Feldstein, M. S., McFadden, D., Poterba, J., & Solow, R. (2011). 100 years of the american economic review: The top 20 articles. American Economic Review, 101(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, A. B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2015). Lectures on public economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bischoff, I., & Hofmann, K. (2002). Classroom game on the theory of rent seeking: Some practical experience. Southern Economic Journal, 69(1), 195–199.Google Scholar
  5. Calcagno, P. T. (2015). Teaching public choice economics in a public finance course. Journal of Economics and Finance Education, 14(2), 23–33.Google Scholar
  6. Conaway, L. B., & Clark, C. (2015). Swansonomics: Using Parks and Recreation to teach economics. Journal of Economics and Finance Education, 14(1), 41–68.Google Scholar
  7. Considine, J. (2006). The simpsons: Public choice in the tradition of Swift and Orwell. The Journal of Economic Education, 37(2), 217–228.Google Scholar
  8. Dechenaux, E., Kovenock, D., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2015). A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments. Experimental Economics, 18(4), 609–669.Google Scholar
  9. Del Rosal, I. (2011). The empirical measurement of rent-seeking costs. Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(2), 298–325.Google Scholar
  10. Durden, G. C., Ellis, L. V., & Millsaps, S. W. (1991). Gordon Tullock: His journal and his scholarship. Public Choice, 71(3), 171–196.Google Scholar
  11. Fike, R., & Gwartney, J. (2015). Public choice, market failure, and government failure in principles textbooks. Journal of Economic Education, 46(2), 207–218.Google Scholar
  12. Gillis, M. T., & Hall, J. (2010). Using the Simpsons to improve economic instruction through policy analysis. The American Economist, 55(1), 84–92.Google Scholar
  13. Goeree, J. K., & Holt, C. A. (1999). Classroom games: Rent-seeking and the inefficiency of non-market allocations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(3), 217–226.Google Scholar
  14. Gruber, J. (2016). Public finance and public policy (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Gwartney, J. D., Stroup, R. L., Sobel, R. S., & Macpherson, D. A. (2018). Economics: Private and public choice. Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  16. Hall, J. (2014). Homer economicus: The Simpsons and economics. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hillman, A. L. (2009). Public finance and public policy: Responsibilities and limitations of government (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hillman, A. L., & Katz, E. (1984). Risk-averse rent seekers and the social cost of monopoly power. Economic Journal, 94(373), 104–110.Google Scholar
  19. Hindriks, J., & Myles, G. D. (2006). Intermediate public economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Holcombe, R. G. (2006). Public sector economics: The role of government in the American economy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Holt, C. A. (1999). Teaching economics with classroom experiments: A symposium. Southern Economic Journal, 65(3), 603–610.Google Scholar
  22. Hubbbard, R. G., & O’Brien, A. P. (2017). Microeconomics. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  23. Jadlow, J. (1985). Monopoly rent seeking under conditions of uncertainty. Public Choice, 45(1), 73–87.Google Scholar
  24. Kaplow, L. (2011). The theory of taxation and public economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Katz, E., Nitzan, S., & Rosenberg, J. (1990). Rent-seeking for pure public goods. Public Choice, 65(1), 49–60.Google Scholar
  26. Krueger, A. O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. American Economic Review, 64(3), 291–303.Google Scholar
  27. Krugman, P., & Wells, R. (2012). Microeconomics. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Laband, D. N., & Sophocleus, J. P. (1988). The social cost of rent-seeking: First estimates. Public Choice, 58(3), 269–275.Google Scholar
  29. Laffont, J. J. (1988). Fundamentals of public economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Mankiw, N. G. (2014). Principles of microeconomics. Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  31. Mateer, G. D., & Stephenson, E. F. (2011). Using film clips to teach public choice economics. Journal of Economics and Finance Education, 10(1), 28–36.Google Scholar
  32. Mateer, G. D., & Stephenson, E. F. (2015). Using film clips to teach public choice economics: Take two. Journal of Economics and Finance Education, 14(2), 76–85.Google Scholar
  33. Mueller, D. C. (2016). Gordon Tullock: Economic gadfly. Constitutional Political Economy, 27(2), 112–123.Google Scholar
  34. Myles, G. D. (1995). Public economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Nitzan, S. (1991). Rent-seeking with non-identical sharing rules. Public Choice, 71(1), 43–50.Google Scholar
  36. Pecorino, P. (2006). Rent seeking: A textbook example. The Journal of Economic Education, 37(3), 331–339.Google Scholar
  37. Podemska-Mikluch, M., Deyo, D., & Mitchell, D. T. (2016). Public choice lessons from the wizarding world of Harry Potter. Journal of Private Enterprise, 31(1), 57.Google Scholar
  38. Rosen, H., & Gayer, T. (2013). Public finance (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar
  39. Rothschild, C., & Scheuer, F. (2016). Optimal taxation with rent-seeking. The Review of Economic Studies, 83(3), 1225–1262.Google Scholar
  40. Salanie, B. (2011). The economics of taxation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Sherementa, R. (2015). Behavioral dimensions of contests, chap 10. In R. Congleton & A. Hillman (Eds.), Companion to the political economy of rent seeking (pp. 150–164). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  42. Shughart, W. F. (2015). Teaching public choice at the master’s level. Journal of Economics and Finance Education, 14(2), 5–22.Google Scholar
  43. Sobel, R. S., & Garrett, T. A. (2002). On the measurement of rent seeking and its social opportunity cost. Public Choice, 112(1), 115–136.Google Scholar
  44. Strow, B. K., & Strow, C. W. (2006). A rent-seeking experiment for the classroom. The Journal of Economic Education, 37(3), 323–330.Google Scholar
  45. Tresch, R. W. (2015). Public finance: A normative theory. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  46. Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Western Economic Journal, 5(3), 224–232.Google Scholar
  47. Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient rent seeking. In J. Buchanan, R. Tollison, & G. Tullock (Eds.), Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Tullock, G. (2003). The origin rent-seeking concept. International Journal of Business and Economics, 2(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  49. Ulbrich, H. H. (2013). Public finance in theory and practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Wasser, C. (2013). Incomplete information in rent-seeking contests. Economic Theory, 53(1), 239–268.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua Hall
    • 1
    Email author
  • Josh Matti
    • 1
  • Amir B. Ferreira Neto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics, College of Business and EconomicsWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations