Southern realignment, party sorting, and the polarization of American primary electorates, 1958–2012
Many scholars have argued that primary elections are an important factor in the polarization of the American Congress. Yet little research measures change in the policy preferences of primary electorates to evaluate the connection directly. We create the first explicit measures of the preferences of primary voters over the last 60 years using a Bayesian item-response theory model. Although the overall distribution of population preferences has changed little, the preferences of primary voters are now much more related to the party of the primary that they attend. We show that liberals are much more likely to turn out in Democratic primaries and conservatives are much more likely to turn out in Republican primaries. We estimate that the divergence of primary from general electorates is six times larger in 2012 than in 1958 owing to this “primary sorting”. This trend began with the emergence of the Southern Republicans. As the Republican party became viable, conservative Southerners switched to Republican primaries leading to a leftward shift in Democratic primary electorates. Nationwide, primary sorting began sometime after it began in the South. We speculate that Southern realignment played a clarifying role that contributed to subsequent sorting of primary electorates nationwide.
KeywordsPolitical polarization Primary elections Southern realignment Bayesian methods
We thank Sara Kerosky for research assistance and Greg Huber, Gary Jacobson, Matt Levendusky, Nolan McCarty, and participants in the 2016 Arizona State University Goldwater Conference for valuable feedback.
- American National Election Studies. (2014). The American National Election Studies (www.electionstudies.org) Time Series Cumulative Data File [dataset]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University and the University of Michigan [producers and distributors].
- Aranson, P. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1972). Spatial strategies for sequential elections. In R. G. Niemi & H. F. Weisberg (Eds.), Probability models of collective decision making. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co.Google Scholar
- Black, E., & Black, M. (2009). The rise of southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Black, M. (1978). Racial composition of congressional districts and support for federalvoting rights In the American south. Social Science Quarterly, 59(3), 435–450.Google Scholar
- Carmines, E. G., & Stimson, J. A. (1989). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., & McIver, J. P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2012). Disconnect: The breakdown of representation in American politics. Julian J. Rothbaum Distinguished Lecture Series. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
- Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. (2005). Culture war?. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
- Hood, M. V., Kidd, Q., & Morris, I. L. (2001). The key issue: Constituency effects and southern senators’ roll-call voting on civil rights. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26(4), 599–621.Google Scholar
- Key, V. O. (1949). Southern politics in state and nation. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
- McCarty, N. M., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Nivola, P. S., & Brady, D. W. (2007). Red and blue nation? Characteristics and causes of America’s polarized politics (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2000). Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar
- Schickler, E. (2016). Racial realignment: the transformation of American liberalism, 1932–1965. Princeton studies in American politics: Historical, international, and comparative perspectives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Shafer, B. E., & Johnston, R. (2009). The end of Southern exceptionalism: Class, race, and partisan change in the postwar South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Sides, J. M., Tausanovitch, C., Warshaw, C., & Vavreck, L. (2014). On the representativeness of primary voters. In The Annual Midwestern Political Science Association Conference.Google Scholar
- Voteview Blog, The. (2015). Polarization continues through 2015. (December 28).Google Scholar