Knowledge of and Attitudes Towards Mental Illness Among ASHA and Anganwadi Workers in Vadodara District, Gujarat State, India
- 9 Downloads
Unmet needs in mental health care are high in low and middle-income countries like India. We propose recruiting community health workers (CHWs) to provide mental health services and address the treatment gap, but there is limited data available on the training needs for this potential role. The aim of this study is to help determine what type of formal mental health training and programming could most benefit CHWs in India. This was a cross sectional study design. Self-administered surveys were conducted amongst CHWs in the villages of Vadodara District, Gujarat, India. Statistical analyses included two tailed t-tests using Microsoft Excel 2011. The most common causes for mental illness were attributed to anxiety (61%) and brain disease (61%) followed by stress (45%) and alcohol use disorder (38%). CHWs were dismissive of faith healers ability to treat mental illness (72.9%) showing a strong approval for recommending psychiatric care for the mentally ill (84.4%). Over 50% of participants believed that mentally ill have a lower IQ and that they were unpredictable, but at the same time asserted that people with mental illness can live in the community (80.8%), and recover if given treatment and support (91.8%). Results are promising with CHWs displaying basic knowledge of the etiology and treatment of disease harboring positive attitudes towards psychiatrist’s ability to treat mental illness. Future direction should focus on training CHWs towards minimizing stigmatizing views and increasing their knowledge of mental illness in order to scale up mental health services in these low resource communities.
KeywordsCommunity health workers Mental health India
We are grateful to The MINDS Foundation, the Department of Psychiatry at SVU, and the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai’s Summer Program in Global Health for their support; and the Department of Population Health Science and Policy at Mount Sinai for their expertise and guidance in statistical analysis; and the villages and its members for their time and cooperation to this study.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. This work was supported by the Program for Global Health at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Qainat N. Shah declares she has no conflict of interest. Pooja A. Dave declares she has no conflict of interest. Dr. Daniella Loh declares she has no conflict of interest. Dr. Raghu Appasani declares he has no conflict of interest. Dr. Craig Katz declares she has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 4.2012 Annual Reports [Internet]. Impact (India): The MINDS Foundation, N.P, 2012-[cited 2017 Jun 30]. Available from http://mindsfoundation.org/our-impact. Accessed 10 Nov 2018.
- 15.Nagaraj S, Achapppa S, Bettapa P, Prakash B. Performance evaluation of accredited social health activist under national rural health mission inMysore district: a cross-sectional study. Natl J Community Med. 2017;8(6):324–328.Google Scholar
- 16.Tilahun D, Hanlon C, Araya M, Davey B, Hoekstra RA, Fekadu A. Training needs and perspectives of community health workers in relation to integrating child mental health care into primary health care in a rural setting in sub-Saharan Africa: a mixed methods study. Int J Ment Heal Syst. 2017;11:15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Mendenhall E, De Silva MJ, Hanlon C, Peterson I, Shidhaye R, Jordans M, et al. Acceptability and feasibility of using non-specialist health workers to deliver mental health care: stakeholder perceptions from the PRIME district sites in Ethiopia, India, Nepal, South Africa, and Uganda. Soc Sci Med. 2014;118:33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar