Advertisement

The importance of research teams with diverse backgrounds: Research collaboration in the Journal of Productivity Analysis

  • Hyun-do Choi
  • Dong-hyun OhEmail author
Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

The Journal of Productivity Analysis (JPA) is a pioneering academic journal that aims to develop new methodologies for efficiency and productivity measurement and apply them into various fields. Collaboration between the contributing authors in JPA who are from various countries, institutes, and disciplines/fields makes it possible to affect the quality of articles. Drawing from bibliographic article information, this paper finds stylized facts from author and keyword networks, and the efficiency of JPA’s major authors. We then examine research collaboration effects in JPA by using a research impact measurement technique. Empirical findings show that author and keyword networks changed over time, and that collaboration across various authors, institutional types and continents is positively associated with research impact.

Keywords

Collaboration Research impact Network analysis Efficiency 

JEL classification

C89 85 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by Inha University (INHA-61571).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Battese GE, Coelli TJ (1992) Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in India. J Product Anal 3(1):153–169Google Scholar
  2. Battese GE, Rao DSP, O’Donnell CJ (2004) A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies. J Product Anal 21(1):91–103Google Scholar
  3. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC (2013) Analyzing social networks. SAGE Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandes U, Erlebach T (2005) Network analysis: methodological foundations. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. Cook WD, Seiford LM (2009) Data envelopment analysis (DEA)–Thirty years on. Eur J operational Res 192(1):1–17Google Scholar
  6. Cooper WW, Park KS, Pastor JT (1999) RAM: A range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA. J Product Anal 11(1):5–42Google Scholar
  7. Daraio C, Simar L (2005) Introducing environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: a probabilistic approach. J Product Anal 24(1):93–121Google Scholar
  8. Diewert WE, Smith AM (1994) Productivity measurement for a distribution firm. J Product Anal 5(4):335–347Google Scholar
  9. Emrouznejad A, Parker BR, Tavares G (2008) Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning. Sciences 42(3):151–157Google Scholar
  10. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lindgren B, Roos P (1992) Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980–1989: a non-parametric Malmquist approach. J Product Anal 3(1–2):85–101Google Scholar
  11. Førsund RF, Sarafoglou N (2005) The tale of two research communities: the diffusion of research on productive efficiency. Int J Prod Econ 98(1):17–40Google Scholar
  12. Fortunato S, Bergstrom CT, Börner K et al. (2018) Science of science. Science 359(6379):eaao0185Google Scholar
  13. Greene W (2005) Fixed and random effects in stochastic frontier models. J Product Anal 23(1):7–32Google Scholar
  14. Guimera R, Uzzi B, Spiro J, Amaral LAN (2005) Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science 308(5722):697–702Google Scholar
  15. Kumbhakar SC, Ortega-Argilés R, Potters L, Vivarelli M, Voigt P (2012) Corporate R&D and firm efficiency: evidence from Europe’s top R&D investors. J Product Anal 37(2):125–140Google Scholar
  16. Lampe HW, Hilgers D (2015) Trajectories of efficiency measurement: a bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA. Eur J Operational Res 240(1):1–21Google Scholar
  17. Leahey E, Beckman CM, Stanko TL (2017) Prominent but less productive: The impact of interdisciplinarity on scientists’ research. Adm Sci Q 62(1):105–139Google Scholar
  18. Lee BL, Wilson C, Pasurka CA, Fujii H, Managi S (2017) Sources of airline productivity from carbon emissions: an analysis of operational performance under good and bad outputs. J Product Anal 47(3):223–246Google Scholar
  19. Lee J-D, Baek C, Kim H-S, Lee J-S (2014) Development pattern of the DEA research field: a social network analysis approach. J Product Anal 41(2):175–186Google Scholar
  20. Leydesdorff L, Meyer M (2006) Triple helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue. Res Policy 35(10):1441–1449Google Scholar
  21. Luke, DA (2015) A user’s guide to network analysis in R. Springer International Publishing, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  22. Olesen OB, Petersen NC (2016) Stochastic data envelopment analysis—A review. Eur J Operational Res 251(1):2–21Google Scholar
  23. Seiford LM (1996) Data envelopment analysis: the evolution of the state of the art (1978–1995). J Product Anal 7(2):99–137Google Scholar
  24. Simar L, Wilson PW (2000) Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: The state of the art. J Product Anal 13(1):49–78Google Scholar
  25. Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Manag Sci 56(1):41–56Google Scholar
  26. Tulkens H (1993) On FDH efficiency analysis: some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit. J Product Anal 4(1):183–210Google Scholar
  27. Wang H-j, Schmidt P (2002) One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels. J Product Anal 18(2):129–144Google Scholar
  28. Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dongguk Business SchoolDongguk University - SeoulSeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringCollege of Engineering, Inha UniversityIncheonKorea

Personalised recommendations