Advertisement

Prevention Science

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 894–903 | Cite as

Effectiveness of Facebook Groups to Boost Participation in a Parenting Intervention

  • Marina EpsteinEmail author
  • Sabrina Oesterle
  • Kevin P. Haggerty
Article

Abstract

Although family-based prevention programs have been shown to be effective at reducing adolescent substance use, it is often difficult and costly to recruit and retain parents in programs administered in person. The current study tested whether program engagement and parenting practices could be improved by offering parents in a self-directed family program access to a private Facebook group. Parents of middle school children (N = 103) were recruited through paid Facebook ads to a 5-week self-directed teen substance use prevention program to be completed at home together by parents and their children. Two thirds of parents (N = 72) were randomly assigned to a moderated private Facebook group that provided a forum for parents in the study to interact with each other, and one third (N = 31) were randomized to use the intervention materials without additional support. Relatively few parents participated in the Facebook group and most did not find the experience useful. However, satisfaction with the program assessed 3 months after program completion was high among all parents and most parents engaged with the materials, irrespective of Facebook group assignment. Overall, parents reported significantly lower conflict and more household rules 6 months post-intervention compared to baseline. Parenting practices did not change more among those assigned to the Facebook group than among parents who used the materials on their own. The current findings suggest that providing opportunities for parents to interact online while participating in a self-directed family intervention may not help to increase engagement or improvements in parenting practices, particularly when few parents engage with each other.

Keywords

Parenting intervention Facebook recruiting Parenting practices Facebook groups 

Notes

Funding Support

This research was financially supported by a grant (R21DA039466) from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).

Disclaimer

The funding organization had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, analysis, or preparation of data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The content of this paper is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIDA.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All activities associated with this study were approved by the University of Washington Institutional Review Board.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained for all participants in the study.

Human and Animal Studies

No work with animals was performed in this study.

References

  1. Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., Pollard, J. A., Catalano, R. F., & Baglioni, A. J., Jr. (2002). Measuring risk and protective factors for substance use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors: The Communities That Care Youth Survey. Evaluation Review, 26, 575–601.Google Scholar
  2. Axford, N., Lehtonen, M., Kaoukji, D., Tobin, K., & Berry, V. (2012). Engaging parents in parenting programs: Lessons from research and practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 2061–2071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baggett, K. M., Davis, B., Feil, E. G., Sheeber, L. B., Landry, S. H., Carta, J. J., & Leve, C. (2010). Technologies for expanding the reach of evidence-based interventions: Preliminary results for promoting social-emotional development in early childhood. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 226–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, C. N., Arnold, D. H., & Meagher, S. (2011). Enrollment and attendance in a parent training prevention program for conduct problems. Prevention Science, 12, 126–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauman, K. E., Foshee, V. A., Ennett, S. T., Pemberton, M., Hicks, K. A., King, T. S., & Koch, G. G. (2001). The influence of a family program on adolescent tobacco and alcohol use. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 604–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beyers, J. M., Toumbourou, J. W., Catalano, R. F., Arthur, M. W., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). A cross-national comparison of risk and protective factors for adolescent substance use: The United States and Australia. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 3–16.Google Scholar
  7. Catalano, R. F., Mazza, J. J., Harachi, T. W., Abbott, R. D., Haggerty, K. P., & Fleming, C. B. (2003). Raising healthy children through enhancing social development in elementary school: Results after 1.5 years. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cavallo, D. N., Tate, D. F., Ries, A. V., Brown, J. D., DeVellis, R. F., & Ammerman, A. S. (2012). A social media–based physical activity intervention: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43, 527–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavallo, D. N., Tate, D. F., Ward, D. S., DeVellis, R. F., Thayer, L. M., & Ammerman, A. S. (2014). Social support for physical activity—role of Facebook with and without structured intervention. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 4, 346–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheung, Y. T. D., Chan, C. H. H., Lai, C.-K. J., Chan, W. F. V., Wang, M. P., Li, H. C. W., et al. (2015). Using WhatsApp and Facebook online social groups for smoking relapse prevention for recent quitters: A pilot pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17, e238.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dahl, A. A., Hales, S. B., & Turner-McGrievy, G. M. (2016). Integrating social media into weight loss interventions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doty, J., & Dworkin, J. (2014). Parents’ of adolescents use of social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duggan, M., Lenhart, A., Lampe, C., & Ellison, N. B. (2015). Parents and social media. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/07/16/parents-and-social-media/.
  15. Duncan, M., Vandelanotte, C., Kolt, G. S., Rosenkranz, R. R., Caperchione, C. M., George, E. S., et al. (2014). Effectiveness of a web-and mobile phone-based intervention to promote physical activity and healthy eating in middle-aged males: Randomized controlled trial of the ManUp study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16, e136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Hansen, W. B., Walsh, J., & Falco, M. (2005). Quality of implementation: Developing measures crucial to understanding the diffusion of preventive interventions. Health Education Research, 20, 308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Epstein, M., Hill, K. G., Bailey, J. A., & Hawkins, J. D. (2013). The effect of general and drug-specific family environments on comorbid and drug-specific problem behavior: A longitudinal examination. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1151–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fagan, A. A., Hanson, K., Hawkins, J. D., & Arthur, M. W. (2009). Translational research in action: Implementation of the Communities That Care prevention system in 12 communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 809–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fleming, C. B., Kim, H., Harachi, T. W., & Catalano, R. F. (2002). Family processes for children in early elementary school as predictors of smoking initiation. Journal of Adolescent Health, 30, 184–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenwood, S., Perrin, A., & Duggan, M. (2016). Social media update 2016. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  21. Gross, D., Julion, W., & Fogg, L. (2001). What motivates participation and dropout among low-income urban families of color in a prevention intervention. Family Relations, 50, 246–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guo, J., Hawkins, J. D., Hill, K. G., & Abbott, R. D. (2001). Childhood and adolescent predictors of alcohol abuse and dependence in young adulthood. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 754–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haggerty, K. P., Fleming, C. B., Lonczak, H. S., Oxford, M. L., Harachi, T. W., & Catalano, R. F. (2002). Predictors of participation in parenting workshops. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 22, 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haggerty, K. P., MacKenzie, E. P., Skinner, M. L., Harachi, T. W., & Catalano, R. F. (2006). Participation in “Parents Who Care”: Predicting program initiation and exposure in two different program formats. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 27, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haggerty, K. P., Skinner, M. L., MacKenzie, E. P., & Catalano, R. F. (2007). A randomized trial of Parents Who Care: Effects on key outcomes at 24-month follow-up. Prevention Science, 8, 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haggerty, K. P., McGlynn-Wright, A., & Klima, T. (2013). Promising parenting programs for reducing adolescent problem behaviors. Journal of Children's Services, 8, 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haggerty, K. P., Skinner, M. L., Catalano, R. F., Abbott, R. D., & Crutchfield, R. D. (2015). Long-term effects of staying connected with your teen on drug use frequency at age 20. Prevention Science, 16, 538–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hales, S. B., Davidson, C., & Turner-McGrievy, G. M. (2014). Varying social media post types differentially impacts engagement in a behavioral weight loss intervention. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 4, 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harachi, T. W., Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1997). Effective recruitment for parenting programs within ethnic minority communities. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 14, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance-abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Kosterman, R., Abbott, R., & Hill, K. G. (1999). Preventing adolescent health-risk behaviors by strengthening protection during childhood. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 153, 226–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hemphill, S. A., Heerde, J. A., Herrenkohl, T. I., Patton, G. C., Toumbourou, J. W., & Catalano, R. F. (2011). Risk and protective factors for adolescent substance use in the United States and Australia: A longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 49, 312–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kernot, J., Olds, T., Lewis, L. K., & Maher, C. A. (2014). Usability testing and piloting of the Mums Step It Up Program--a team-based social networking physical activity intervention for women with young children. PLoS One, 9, e108842.Google Scholar
  34. Laranjo, L., Arguel, A., Neves, A. L., Gallagher, A. M., Kaplan, R., Mortimer, N., et al. (2014). The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22, 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Love, S. M., Sanders, M. R., Turner, K. M., Maurange, M., Knott, T., Prinz, R., et al. (2016). Social media and gamification: Engaging vulnerable parents in an online evidence-based parenting program. Child Abuse & Neglect, 53, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maher, C. A., Lewis, L. K., Ferrar, K., Marshall, S., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., & Vandelanotte, C. (2014). Are health behavior change interventions that use online social networks effective? A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16, e40.Google Scholar
  37. Markie-Dadds, C., & Sanders, M. R. (2006). Self-directed Triple P (Positive Parenting Program) for mothers with children at-risk of developing conduct problems. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 34, 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mason, W. A., Kosterman, R., Hawkins, J. D., Haggerty, K. P., & Spoth, R. L. (2003). Reducing adolescents’ growth in substance use and delinquency: Randomized trial effects of a preventive parent-training intervention. Prevention Science, 4, 203–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Merchant, G., Weibel, N., Patrick, K., Fowler, J. H., Norman, G. J., Gupta, A., et al. (2014). Click “like” to change your behavior: A mixed methods study of college students’ exposure to and engagement with Facebook content designed for weight loss. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16, e158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Metzler, C. W., Sanders, M. R., Rusby, J. C., & Crowley, R. N. (2012). Using consumer preference information to increase the reach and impact of media-based parenting interventions in a public health approach to parenting support. Behavior Therapy, 43, 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Napolitano, M. A., Hayes, S., Bennett, G. G., Ives, A. K., & Foster, G. D. (2013). Using Facebook and text messaging to deliver a weight loss program to college students. Obesity, 21, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O'Donnell, J., Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Abbott, R. D., & Day, L. E. (1995). Preventing school failure, drug use, and delinquency among low-income children: Long-term intervention in elementary schools. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 65, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oesterle, S., Epstein, M., Haggerty, K. P., & Moreno, M. A. (2018). Using Facebook to recruit parents to participate in a family program to prevent teen drug use. Prevention Science, 19, 559–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oxford, M. L., Harachi, T. W., Catalano, R. F., & Abbott, R. D. (2001). Preadolescent predictors of substance initiation: A test of both the direct and mediated effect of family social control factors on deviant peer associations and substance initiation. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27, 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pagoto, S., Waring, M. E., May, C. N., Ding, E. Y., Kunz, W. H., Hayes, R., & Oleski, J. L. (2016). Adapting behavioral interventions for social media delivery. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18, e24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Richardson, J. T. E. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6, 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Selby, P., van Mierlo, T., Voci, S. C., Parent, D., & Cunningham, J. A. (2010). Online social and professional support for smokers trying to quit: An exploration of first time posts from 2562 members. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12, e34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith, A., & Anderson, M. (2018). Social media use in 2018. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  49. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Shin, C., & Azevedo, K. (2004). Brief family intervention effects on adolescent substance initiation: School-level growth curve analyses 6 years following baseline. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 535–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stelzner, M. A. (2017). 2017 social media marketing industry report: How marketers are using social media to grow their businesses. Social Media Examiner. Retrieved from: https://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/social-media-marketing-industry-report-2017/.
  51. Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2009). A school-based, family-centered intervention to prevent substance use: The Family Check-Up. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 35, 227–232.Google Scholar
  52. Tate, D. F., Lyons, E. J., & Valle, C. G. (2015). High-tech tools for exercise motivation: Use and role of technologies such as the internet, mobile applications, social media, and video games. Diabetes Spectrum: A Publication of the American Diabetes Association, 28, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Trusty, J., Thompson, B., & Petrocelli, J. V. (2004). Practical guide for reporting effect size in quantitative research in the Journal of Counseling & Development. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82, 107–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vandelanotte, C., & Maher, C. A. (2015). Why we need more than just randomized controlled trials to establish the effectiveness of online social networks for health behavior change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 30, 74–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Whittaker, K. A., & Cowley, S. (2012). An effective programme is not enough: A review of factors associated with poor attendance and engagement with parenting support programmes. Children & Society, 26, 138–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yang, Q. (2017). Are social networking sites making health behavior change interventions more effective? A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 22, 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zickuhr, K., & Smith, A. (2012). Digital differences. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center Retrieved from: http://pewInternet.org/Reports/2012/Digital-differences.aspx.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marina Epstein
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sabrina Oesterle
    • 1
  • Kevin P. Haggerty
    • 1
  1. 1.Social Development Research Group, School of Social WorkUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations