Examining Intervention Component Dosage Effects on Substance Use Initiation in the Strengthening Families Program: for Parents and Youth Ages 10–14
- 286 Downloads
Family-based prevention programs increasingly are being disseminated and can be effective for an array of adolescent problem behaviors, including substance use initiation. Yet, we continue to have little understanding of how and why these programs work. Increased specificity in our understanding of what components drive program effects can facilitate refinement of programs, with potential for greater impact at a lower cost. Using attendance data, previously coded intervention components, and a previously developed propensity model to adjust for potential bias, this study evaluated content component-specific dosage effects of the Strengthening Families Program: for Parents and Youth Ages 10–14 on three substance use initiation outcomes by grade 12. Results indicated that greater dosages of program content related to (a) parental monitoring and behavior management strategies and (b) promoting positive family relationships had potent and robust effects on reduction of risk for initiating drunkenness and marijuana use and (c) self-regulation and stress management had potent and robust effects on reduction of risk for initiating cigarette and marijuana use. Results indicate potential critical components within SFP 10–14 and offer a path forward for continuing work in efforts to optimize this widely disseminated program.
KeywordsFamily-based intervention Substance use prevention Propensity scores Component analysis
This research was supported by grant R01-DA013709 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse and co-funded by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. This project was supported by the Prevention and Methodology Training Program (T32 DA017629; PI: L.M. Collins) funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent/assent was obtained from all adolescents/parents included in the study.
- Brody, G. H., Murry, V. M., Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F. X., Molgaard, V., McNair, L., … Neubaum-Carlan, E. (2004). The Strong African American Families Program: Translating research into prevention programming. Child Development, 73, 900–917.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PREV.0000037641.26017.00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cordova, D., Heinze, J., Mistry, R., Hsieh, H., Stoddard, S., Salas-Wright, C., & Zimmerman, M. (2014). Family functioning and parent support trajectories and substance use and misuse among minority urban adolescents: A latent class growth analysis. Substance Use & Misuse, 49, 1908–1919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2011.02.012.Investigations.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Crowley, D. M., Coffman, D. L., Feinberg, M. E., Greenberg, M. T., & Spoth, R. L. (2014). Evaluating the impact of implementation factors on family-based prevention programming: Methods for strengthening causal inference. Prevention Science, 15, 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0352-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- De Martini-Scully, D., Bray, M. A., & Kehle, T. J. (2000). A packaged intervention to reduce disruptive behaviors in general education students. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(200003)37:2<149::AID-PITS6>3.0.CO;2-K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dumas, J. E., Moreland, A. D., Gitter, A. H., Pearl, A. M., & Nordstrom, A. H. (2008). Engaging parents in preventive parenting groups: Do ethnic, socioeconomic, and belief match between parents and group leaders matter? Health Education & Behavior, 35, 619–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198106291374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology.Google Scholar
- Fairchild, A. J., & Mackinnon, D. P. (2014). Factors affecting implementation: Cultural adaptation and training. In Z. Sloboda & H. Petras (Eds.), Defining prevention science (pp. 315–334). New York: Springer Science + Business Media.Google Scholar
- Fleming, C. B., Mason, W. A., Haggerty, K. P., Thompson, R. W., Fernandez, K., Casey-Goldstein, M., & Oats, R. G. (2015). Predictors of participation in parenting workshops for improving adolescent behavioral and mental health: Results from the common sense parenting trial. Journal of Primary Prevention, 36, 105–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Forgatch, M. S., Patterson, G. R., & DeGarmo, D. S. (2005). Evaluating fidelity: Predictive validity for a measure of competent adherence to the Oregon model of parent management training. Behavior Therapy, 36, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80049-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Fosco, G. M., Seeley, J. R., Dishion, T. J., Smolkowski, K., Stormshak, E. A., Downey-McCarthy, R., … Strycker, L. A. (2014). Lessons learned from scaling up the ecological approach to family interventions and treatment programs in middle schools. In M. Weist, N. Lever, C. Bradshaw, & J. Owens (Eds.), Handbook of school mental health (pp. 237–251). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
- Franks, R., & Schroeder, J. (2013). Applying implementation science in early childhood programs and systems. In T. Halle, A. Metz, & I. Martinez-Beck (Eds.), Applying implementation science to early care and education programs and systems: Exploring a new frontier (pp. 5–19). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
- Gottfredson, D. C., Cook, T. D., Gardner, F. E. M., Gorman-Smith, D., Howe, G. W., Sandler, I. N., & Zafft, K. M. (2015). Standards of evidence for efficacy, effectiveness, and scale-up research in prevention science: Next generation. Prevention Science, 16, 893–926.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hanisch, C., Hautmann, C., Pluck, J., Eichelberger, I., & Dopfner, M. (2014). The prevention program for externalizing problem behavior (PEP) improves child behavior by reducing negative parenting: Analysis of mediating processes in a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12177.
- Henderson, C. E., Rowe, C. L., Dakof, G. A., Hawes, S. W., & Liddle, H. A. (2009). Parenting practices as mediators of treatment effects in an early-intervention trial of multidimensional family therapy. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 35, 220–226.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kazdin, A. E. (2007). Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kumpfer, K. L., Molgaard, V., & Spoth, R. L. (1996). The Strengthening Families Program for the prevention of delinquency and drug use. In R. D. Peters & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Preventing childhood disorders, substance abuse, and delinquency (pp. 241–267). Thousand Oaks, C.A.: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Odgers, C. L., Caspi, A., Nagin, D. S., Piquero, A. R., Slutske, W. S., Milne, B. J., … Moffitt, T. E. (2008). Is it important to prevent early exposure to drugs and alcohol among adolescents? Psychological Science, 19, 1037–1044.Google Scholar
- R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statiscal computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org.
- Redmond, C., Spoth, R., Shin, C., Schainker, L. M., Greenberg, M. T., & Feinberg, M. (2009). Long-term protective factor outcomes of evidence-based interventions implemented by community teams through a community-university partnership. Journal of Primary Prevention, 30, 513–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-009-0189-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spoth, R., Clair, S., Greenberg, M., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (2007). Toward dissemination of evidence-based family interventions: Maintenance of community-based partnership recruitment results and associated factors. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 137–146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Shin, C., Greenberg, M., Feinberg, M., & Schainker, L. (2013). PROSPER community-university partnership delivery system effects on substance misuse through 6 1/2 years past baseline from a cluster randomized controlled intervention trial. Preventive Medicine, 56, 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.12.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Mason, W. A., Schainker, L., & Borduin, L. (2015). Research on the Strengthening Families Program for Parents and Youth Ages 10–14: Long-term effects, mechanisms, translation to public health, prosper partnership scale up. In L. M. Scheier (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent drug use prevention: Research, intervention strategies, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 267–292). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Trentacosta, C. J., & Shaw, D. S. (2009). Emotional self-regulation, peer rejection, and antisocial behavior: Developmental associations from early childhood to early adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.016.
- van Buuren, S. & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). Mice: Multiple imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
- Van Ryzin, M. J., & Fosco, G. M. (2016). Family-based approaches to prevention. In M. J. Van Ryzin, K. L. Kumpfer, G. M. Fosco, & M. T. Greenberg (Eds.), Family-based prevention programs for children and adolescents (1st ed., pp. 1–20). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Varvil-Weld, L., Crowley, D. M., Turrisi, R., Greenberg, M. T., & Mallett, K. A. (2014). Hurting, helping, or neutral? The effects of parental permissiveness toward adolescent drinking on college student alcohol use and problems. Prevention Science, 15, 716–724.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar