Advertisement

Prevention Science

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 824–832 | Cite as

Perceived Social Acceptability and Longitudinal Trends in Adolescent Cigarette Smoking

  • Emily LongEmail author
  • Thomas W. Valente
Article

Abstract

The current study uses methods from social network analysis to predict longitudinal trends in adolescent cigarette smoking based on perceived social acceptability from friends, in addition to typical measures of peer influence (e.g., self-reported cigarette use of friends). By concurrently investigating the role of perceived social acceptability of smoking and peer influence, the current study offers new insight into the mechanisms through which peers influence adolescent smoking. Two waves of data from five high schools within one US school district (n = 1563) were used. Stochastic actor-based models simultaneously estimated changes in smoking predicted by perceived social acceptability and peer influence. Findings demonstrate that adolescents with higher perceived social acceptability of cigarette use increased cigarette smoking over time. Conversely, support for peer influence on smoking was not found after controlling for the effects of perceived social acceptability. The results suggest that perceived social acceptability regarding cigarette smoking rather than self-report of cigarette use among friends is predictive of future smoking behavior. Consequently, the findings highlight the need for prevention efforts to take into account the multifaceted dynamics between adolescent smoking and friendships. Programs that address peer influence alone, without considering peer mechanisms such as perceived social acceptability, are at risk of ignoring critical avenues for prevention.

Keywords

Social networks Smoking Perceived social acceptability 

Notes

Funding information

This study was supported by NIH Grant RC1AA019239 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11121_2018_945_MOESM1_ESM.docx (100 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 100 kb)

References

  1. Brechwald, W., & Prinstein, M. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bricker, J., Liu, J., Comstock, B., Peterson, A., Kealey, K., & Marek, P. (2010). Social cognitive mediators of adolescent smoking cessation: Results from a large randomized intervention trial. Journal of Addictive Behavior, 24, 436–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), The handbook of child psychology: Vol 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 793–828). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, A., Moodie, C., Hastings, G., Mackintosh, A., Hassan, L., & Thrasher, J. (2010). The association of normative perceptions with adolescent smoking intentions. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 603–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burk, W., Steglich, C., & Snijders, T. (2007). Beyond dyadic interdependence: Actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Current cigarette smoking among adultsCigarette Smoking Among Adults—United States, 2005–2015. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 65, 1205–1211.Google Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017). Tobacco Use use Among among Middle middle and High high School school Studentsstudents—United States, 2011–2016. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/wr/mm6623a1.htm?s_cid=mm6623a1_w
  8. Cummings, K., & Proctor, R. (2014). The changing public image of smoking in the United States: 1964–2014. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 23, 32–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delay, D., Laursen, B., Kiuru, N., Salmela-Aro, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2013). Selecting and retaining friends on the basis of cigarette smoking similarity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 464–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eisenberg, M., Toumbourou, J., Catalano, R., & Hemphill, S. (2014). Social norms in the development of adolescent substance use: A longitudinal analysis of the international youth development study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1486–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. El-Toukhy, S., Sabado, M., & Choi, K. (2016). Trends in susceptibility to smoking by race and ethnicity. Pediatrics, 138, e20161254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fujimoto, K., & Valente, T. (2012). Decomposing the components of friendship and friends’ influence on adolescent drinking alcohol and cigarette smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51, 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Green, H., Horta, M., de la Haye, M., Tucker, J., Kennedy, D., & Pollard, M. (2013). Peer influence and selection processes in adolescent smoking behavior: A comparative study. Journal of Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 15, 534–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hoffman, B., Monge, P., Chou, C., & Valente, T. (2007). Perceived peer influence and peer selection on adolescent smoking. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 1546–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang, G., Soto, D., Fujimoto, K., & Valente, T. (2014). The interplay of friendship networks and social networking sites: Longitudinal analysis of selection and influence effects on adolescent smoking and drinking. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huisman, M., & Steglich, C. (2008). Treatment of non- response in longitudinal network studies. Social Networks, 30, 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kulesza, M., Larimer, M. E., & Rao, D. (2013). Substance use related stigma: What we know and the way forward. Journal of Addictive Behaviors, Therapy & Rehabilitation, 2, 782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lakon, C., Hipp, J., & Timberlake, D. (2010). The social context of adolescent smoking: A systems perspective. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 1218–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mercken, L., Snijders, T., Steglich, C., Vartiainen, E., & de Vries, H. (2010). Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior. Social Networks, 32, 72–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Orlando, M., Tucker, J., Ellickson, P., & Klein, D. (2004). Developmental trajectories of cigarette smoking and their correlates from early adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology, 72, 400–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Osgood, D., Feinberg, M., Gest, S., Moody, J., Ragan, D., Spoth, R., Greenberg, M., & Redmond, C. (2013). Effects of PROSPER on the influence potential of prosocial versus antisocial youth in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, 174–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Parker, J., Rubin, K., Erath, S., Wojslawowicz, J., Buskirk, A., Cicchetti, D., & Cohen, D. (2006). Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment: A developmental psychopathology perspective. In Developmental psychopathology: Theory and method (pp. 419–493). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  25. Ripley, R., Snijders, T., Boda, Z., Vörös, A., & Preciado, P. (2018). Manual for SIENA version 4.0. Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics; Nuffield College.Google Scholar
  26. Schaefer, D., Haas, S., & Bishop, N. (2012). A dynamic model of US adolescents’ smoking and friendship networks. American Journal of Public Health, 102, e12–e18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schweinberger, M. (2012). Statistical modeling of network panel data: Goodness of fit. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 65, 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simons-Morton, B., & Farhat, T. (2010). Recent findings on peer group influences on adolescent substance use. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 31, 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Snijders, T. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology, 31, 361–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Snijders, T., & Baerveldt, C. (2003). Multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship evolution. Mathematical Sociology, 27, 123–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Snijders, T., Steglich, C., & Schweinberger, M. (2007). Modeling the co-evolution of networks and behavior. In K. Van Montfort, H. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 41–71). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Snijders, T., van de Bunt, G., & Steglich, C. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Spelman, A., Spitz, M., Kelder, S., Prokhorov, A., Bondy, M., Frankowski, R., & Wilkinson, A. (2009). Cognitive susceptibility to smoking: Two paths to experimenting among Mexican origin youth. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention : A Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 18, 3459–3467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Steglich, C., Snijders, T., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic Networks and Behavior: Separating Selection from Influence. Sociological Methodology, 40, 329–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influenceDevelopmental. Psychology, 43, 1531–1543.Google Scholar
  36. Stigler, M., Neusel, E., & Perry, C. (2011). School-based programs to prevent and reduce alcohol use among youth. Alcohol Research and Health, 34, 157–162.Google Scholar
  37. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2012). Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: a report of the surgeon generalTobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/2012/index.htm
  38. Umberson, D., & Montez, J. (2010). Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51, S54–S66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Valente, T. (2012). Network interventions. Science, 337, 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Valente, T., Fujimoto, K., Soto, D., Ritt-Olson, A., & Unger, J. (2013). A comparison of peer influence measures as predictors of smoking among predominately Hispanic/Latino high school adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52, 358–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Valente, T., Hoffman, B., Ritt-Olson, A., Lichtman, K., & Johnson, C. (2003). The effects of a social network method for group assignment strategies on peer led tobacco prevention programs in schools. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1837–1843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Valente, T., Unger, J., & Johnson, A. (2005). Do popular students smoke? The association between popularity and smoking among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37, 323–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van de Bunt, G., Van Duijn, M., & Snijders, T. (1999). Friendship networks through time: An actor-oriented dynamic statistical network model. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 5, 167–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang, C., Butts, C., Jose, R., & Lakon, C. (2016). Coevolution of adolescent friendship networks and smoking and drinking behaviors with consideration of parental influence. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 30, 312–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wellman, R., Dugas, E., Dutczak, H., O’Loughlin, E., Datta, G., & Lauzon, J. (2016). Predictors of the onset of cigarette smoking: A systematic review of longitudinal population-based studies in youth. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51, 767–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  2. 2.Department of Preventive Medicine, Institute for Prevention Research, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations