Advertisement

Prevention Science

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 310–320 | Cite as

Evaluating Personalized Feedback Intervention Framing with a Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Young Adult Alcohol-Related Sexual Risk Taking

  • Melissa A. LewisEmail author
  • Isaac C. Rhew
  • Anne M. Fairlie
  • Alex Swanson
  • Judyth Anderson
  • Debra Kaysen
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate personalized feedback intervention (PFI) framing with two web-delivered PFIs aimed to reduce young adult alcohol-related risky sexual behavior (RSB). Combined PFIs typically use an additive approach whereby independent components on drinking and components on RSB are presented without the discussion of the influence of alcohol on RSB. In contrast, an integrated PFI highlights the RSB-alcohol connection by presenting integrated alcohol and RSB components that focus on the role of intoxication as a barrier to risk reduction in sexual situations. In a randomized controlled trial, 402 (53.98% female) sexually active young adults aged 18–25 were randomly assigned to a combined PFI, an integrated PFI, or attention control. All assessment and intervention procedures were web-based. At the 1-month follow-up, those randomly assigned to the integrated condition had a lower likelihood of having any casual sex partners compared to those in the control group. At the 6-month follow-up, the combined condition had a lower likelihood of having any casual sex partners compared to those in the control group. When examining alcohol-related RSB, at the 1-month follow-up, both interventions showed a lower likelihood of any drinking prior to sex compared to the control group. When examining alcohol-related sexual consequences, results showed a reduction in the non-zero count of consequences in the integrated condition compared to the control at the 1-month follow-up. For typical drinks per week, those in the combined condition showed a greater reduction in the non-zero count of drinks than those in the control condition at the 1-month follow-up. While there were no significant differences between the two interventions, the current findings highlight the utility of two efficacious web-based alcohol and RSB interventions among a national sample of at-risk young adults.

Keywords

Personalized feedback intervention Young adults Alcohol Sexual risk taking Negative consequences 

Notes

Funding

Data collection and manuscript preparation were supported by National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Grant R21AA021767. The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the author(s) and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism or the National Institutes of Health.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

There authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study had IRB approval. All applicable national and institutional guidelines for studies with human participants were followed.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Atkins, D. C. (2005). Using multilevel models to analyze couple and family treatment data: Basic and advanced issues. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(1), 98–110.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkins, D. C., Baldwin, S. A., Zheng, C., Gallop, R. J., & Neighbors, C. (2013). A tutorial on count regression and zero-altered count models for longitudinal substance use data. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27, 166–177.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bewick, B. M., Trusler, K., Barkham, M., Hill, A. J., Cahill, J., & Mulhern, B. (2008). The effectiveness of web-based interventions designed to decrease alcohol consumption—A systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 47, 17–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Billings, D. W., Leaf, S. L., Spencer, J., Crenshaw, T., Brockington, S., & Dalal, R. S. (2015). A randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of a web-based HIV behavioral intervention for high-risk African American women. AIDS and Behavior, 19, 1263–1274.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-0999-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carey, K. B., Scott-Sheldon, L. A. J., Carey, M. P., & DeMartini, K. S. (2007). Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: A meta-analytic review. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2469–2494.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandra, A., Mosher, W. D., Copen, C., & Sionean, C. (2011). Sexual behavior, sexual attraction, and sexual identity in the United States: Data from the 2006–2008 National Survey of Family Growth. In: National Health Statistics Reports (pp. 1–36). Hyattsville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  7. Collins, R. L., Parks, G. A., & Marlatt, G. A. (1985). Social determinants of alcohol consumption: The effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 189–200.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.53.2.189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cronce, J. M., & Larimer, M. E. (2011). Individual-focused approaches to the prevention of college student drinking. Alcohol Research and Health, 34, 210–221.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, K. C., Hendershot, C. S., George, W. H., Norris, J., & Heiman, J. R. (2007). Alcohol's effects on sexual decision making: An integration of alcohol myopia and individual differences. Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 68(6), 843–851.Google Scholar
  10. Dermen, K. H., & Thomas, S. N. (2011). Randomized controlled trial of brief interventions to reduce college students’ drinking and risky sex. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25, 583–594.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dimeff, L. A., Baer, J. S., Kivlahan, D. R., & Marlatt, G. A. (1999). Brief alcohol screening and intervention for college students. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  12. Doumas, D. M., McKinley, L. L., & Book, P. (2009). Evaluation of two web-based alcohol interventions for mandated college students. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 36, 65–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2008.05.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fairlie, A. M., Davis, K. C., Norris, J., Kaysen, D., Litt, D. M., & Lewis, M. A. (2017). Factor structure of a measure assessing alcohol-related sexual consequences among at-risk young adults. Manuscript in preparation. Google Scholar
  14. Fazzino, T. L., Rose, G. L., & Helzer, J. E. (2016). An experimental test of assessment reactivity within a web-based brief alcohol intervention study for college students. Addictive Behaviors, 52, 66–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.08.01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fremouw, W. J., & Brown, J. P. (1980). The reactivity of addictive behaviors to self-monitoring: A functional analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 5, 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geisner, I. M., Lewis, M. A., Rhew, I. C., Mittmann, A. J., Larimer, M. E., & Lee, C. M. (2017). Does one day of drinking matter? 21st birthday drinking predicts subsequent drinking and consequences. Addictive Behaviors, 64, 57–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hadfield, J. D. (2010). MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: The MCMCglmm R Package. Journal of Statistical Software, 33, 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamra, G., MacLehose, R., & Richardson, D. (2013). Markov chain Monte Carlo: An introduction for epidemiologists. International Journal of Epidemiology, 42, 627–634.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Helzer, J. E., Badger, G. J., Rose, G. L., Mongeon, J. A., & Searles, J. S. (2002). Decline in alcohol consumption during two years of daily reporting. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, 551–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hendershot, C. S., & George, W. H. (2007). Alcohol and sexuality research in the AIDS era: Trends in publication activity, target populations and research design. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 217–226.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-006-9130-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hingson, R., & White, A. (2014). New research findings since the 2007 Surgeon General’s call to action to prevent and reduce underage drinking: A review. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 75, 158–169.  https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2014.75.158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hufford, M. R., Shields, A. L., Shiffman, S., Paty, J., & Balabanis, M. (2002). Reactivity to ecological momentary assessment: An example using undergraduate problem drinkers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huh, D., Mun, E., Larimer, M. E., White, H. R., Ray, A. E., Rhew, I., & Atkins, D. C. (2015). Brief motivational interventions for college student drinking may not be as powerful as we think: An individual participant-level meta-analysis. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 39, 919–931.  https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.12714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kiene, S. M., Barta, W. D., Tennen, H., & Armeli, S. (2009). Alcohol, helping young adults to have unprotected sex with casual partners: Findings from a daily diary study of alcohol use and sexual behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health, 44, 73–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuerbis, A. N., Schaumberg, K., Davis, C. M., Hail, L., & Morgenstern, J. (2014). Unpacking personalized feedback: An exploratory study of the impact of its components and the reactions it elicits among problem drinking men who have sex with men. Substance Use & Misuse, 49, 383–394.  https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2013.841247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewis, M. A., & Neighbors, C. (2015). An examination of college student activities and attentiveness during a web-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 29, 162–167.  https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewis, M. A., Lee, C. M., Patrick, M. E., & Fossos, N. (2007). Gender-specific normative misperceptions of risky sexual behavior and alcohol-related risky sexual behavior. Sex Roles, 57, 81–90.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9218-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewis, M. A., Patrick, M. E., Litt, D. M., Blayney, J. A., Atkins, D. C., Kim, T., … Larimer, M. E. (2014a). Randomized controlled trial of a web-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention to reduce alcohol-related risky sexual behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 429–440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035550.
  29. Lewis, M. A., Patrick, M. E., Mittmann, A., & Kaysen, D. L. (2014b). Sex on the beach: The influence of social norms and trip companion on spring break sexual behavior. Prevention Science, 15(3), 408–418.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-014-0460-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Madden, M., & Zickuhr, K. (2011). 65% of online adults use social networking sites. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/08/26/65-of-online-adults-use-social-networking-sites/.
  31. Martens, M. P., Cadigan, J. M., Rogers, R. E., & Osborn, Z. H. (2015). Personalized drinking feedback intervention for veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 76, 355–359.  https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2015.76.355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Monti, P. M., Mastroleo, N. R., Barnett, N. P., & Colby, S. M. (2016). Brief motivational intervention to reduce alcohol and HIV/sexual risk behavior in emergency department patients: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84, 580–591.  https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mullen, P. D., Simons-Morton, D. G., Ramírez, G., Frankowski, R. F., Green, L. W., & Mains, D. A. (1997). A meta-analysis of trials evaluating patient education and counseling for three groups of preventive health behaviors. Patient Education and Counseling, 32, 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Norris, J. (2011). “Fresh” thoughts on studying sexual assault. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 369–374.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311404137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patrick, M. E., Lee, C. M., & Neighbors, C. (2014). Web-based intervention to change perceived norms of college student alcohol use and sexual behavior on spring break. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 600–606.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.11.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rehm, J., Shield, K. D., Joharchi, N., & Shuper, P. A. (2012). Alcohol consumption and the intention to engage in unprotected sex: Systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Addiction, 107, 51–59.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03621.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Satterwhite, C. L., Torrone, E., Meites, E., Dunne, E. F., Mahajan, R., Ocfemia, M.C., … Weinstock, H. (2013). Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: Prevalence and incidence estimates, 2008. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 40, 187–93. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318286bb53
  38. Simpson, T. L., Kivlahan, D. R., Bush, K. R., & McFall, M. E. (2005). Telephone self-monitoring among alcohol use disorder patients in early recovery: A randomized study of feasibility and measurement reactivity. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 79, 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Steele, C. M., & Josephs, R. A. (1990). Alcohol myopia. Its prized and dangerous effects. American Psychologist, 45, 921–933.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066S.45.8.921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Testa, M., & Livingston, J. A. (2009). Alcohol consumption and women's vulnerability to sexual victimization: Can reducing women’s drinking prevent rape? Substance Use & Misuse, 44, 1349–1376.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080902961468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. White, A. M., Macinnes, E., Hingson, R. W., & Pan, I. J. (2013). Hospitalizations for suicide-related drug poisonings and co-occurring alcohol overdoses in adolescents (ages 12–17) and young adults (ages 18–24) in the United States, 1999–2008: Results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Suicide and Life-threatening Behavior, 43, 198–212.  https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melissa A. Lewis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Isaac C. Rhew
    • 2
  • Anne M. Fairlie
    • 2
  • Alex Swanson
    • 2
  • Judyth Anderson
    • 2
  • Debra Kaysen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Health Behavior and Health SystemsUniversity of North Texas Health Science CenterFort WorthUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations