Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) protects photosynthetic apparatus of wheat under drought stress
Drought stress (DS) is amongst one of the abiotic factors affecting plant growth by limiting productivity of crops by inhibiting photosynthesis. Damage due to DS and its protection by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) was studied on photosynthetic apparatus of wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants in pot experiments. DS was maintained by limiting irrigation to the drought stressed (DS) and AMF + DS plants. Relative Water content (RWC) was measured for leaf as well as soil to ensure drought conditions. DS plants had minimum RWC for both leaf and soil. AMF plants showed increased RWC both for leaf and soil indicating that AMF hyphae penetrated deep into the soil and provided moisture to the plants. In Chl a fluorescence induction curve (OJIP), a declined J–I and I–P phase was observed in DS plants. Efficacy of primary photochemistry declined in DS plants as result of DS, while AMF plants showed maximum photochemistry. DS leads to declined quantum efficiency of PSI and PSII in DS plants while it was restored in AMF + DS plants. Electron transport (ETRI and ETRII) decreased while quantum yield of non-photochemical quenching Y(NPQ) increased as a result of drought stress. CEF around PSI increased in DS-stressed plants. Efficient PSI complexes decreased in DS plants while in case of AMF plants PSI complexes were able to perform PSI photochemistry significantly. Thus, it is concluded that drought stress-induced damage to the structure and function of PSII and PSI was alleviated by AMF colonization.
KeywordsArbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) Drought Wheat Photosynthesis Photosystem II Photosystem I
Arbuscular Mycorrhiza fungi
Linear electron flow
Maximal change in P700 signal
Relative water content
Quantum yield of PSI
Quantum yield of PSII
Quantum yield of non-photochemical energy dissipation due to acceptor-side limitation
Quantum yield of non-photochemical energy dissipation due to donor-side limitation
Yield of non-regulated energy dissipation.
Yield of regulated energy dissipation
SM acknowledges University Grants Commission, (UGC), India for awarding Post Doctoral Fellowship for Women (PDFWM-2014-15-GEMAD-23945). We would like to acknowledge Dr. S.V. Sai Prasad (Director, ICAR-IARI, Regional station, Indore) for providing wheat seeds and Dr. M.P. Sharma (PI, ICAR-IISR, Indore) for his kind support.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Ceppi MG, Oukarroum A, Cicek N, Strasser RJ, Schansker G (2012) The IP amplitude of the fluorescence rise OJIP is sensitive to changes in the photosystem I content of leaves: a study on plants exposed to magnesium and sulfate deficiencies, drought stress and salt stress. Physiol Plant 144:277–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haneef I, Faizan S, Perveen R, Kausar S (2013) Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and photosynthetic pigments in (Coriandrum sativum L.) grown under cadmium stress. World J Agric Sci 9:245–250Google Scholar
- Huang W, Yang YJ, Hu H, Zhang SB (2015) Different roles of cyclic electron flow around photosystem I under sub-saturating and saturating light intensities in tobacco leaves. Front Plant Sci 6:923Google Scholar
- Ivanov AG, Hendrickson L, Krol M, Selstam E, Oquist G, Hurry V, Huner NPA (2006) Digalactosyl-Diacylglycerol deficiency impairs the capacity for photosynthetic intersystem electron transport and state transitions in Arabidopsis thaliana due to Photosystem I acceptor-side limitations. Plant Cell Physiol 47:1146–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kalaji HM, Oukarroum A, Alexandrov V, Kouzmanova M, Brestic M, Zivcak M, Samborska IA, Cetner MD, Allakhverdiev SI, Goltsev V (2014) Identification of nutrient deficiency in maize and tomato plants by in vivo chlorophyll a fluorescence measurements. Plant Physiol Biochem 81:16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kalaji HM, Schansker G, Brestic M, Bussotti F, Calatayud A, Ferroni L, Goltsev V, Guidi L, Jajoo A, Li P, Losciale P, Mishra VK, Misra AN, Nebauer SG, Pancaldi S, Penella C, Pollastrini M, Suresh MK, Tambussi E, Yanniccari M, Zivcak M, Cetner MD, Samborska IA, Stirbet A, Olsovska K, Kunderlikova K, Shelonzek H, Rusinowski S, Baba W (2017) Frequently asked questions about chlorophyll fluorescence, the sequel. Photosynth Res 132:13–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miyake C, Miyata M, Shinzaki Y, Tomizawa K (2005) CO2 response of cyclic electron flow around PSI (CEF-PSI) in tobacco leaves—relative electron fluxes through PSI and PSII determine the magnitude of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of chl fluorescence. Plant Cell Physiol 46:629–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pebriansyah A, Karti PDMH, Permana AT (2012) Effect of drought stress and addition of Arbuscula mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on growth and productivity of tropical grasses (Chloris gayana, Paspalum dilatatum, and Paspalum notatum). Pastura 2:41–48Google Scholar
- Pfündel E, Klughammer C, Ulrich S (2008) Monitoring the effects of reduced PS II antenna size on quantum yields of photosystems I and II using the Dual-PAM-100 measuring system. PAM Appl Notes 1:21–24Google Scholar
- Sharma MP, Singh S, Sharma SK, Ramesh A, Bhatia VS (2016) Co-inoculation of resident AM Fungi and soybean rhizobia enhanced nodulation, yield, soil biological parameters and saved Fertilizer inputs in vertisols under microcosm and field conditions. Soybean Res 14:39–53Google Scholar
- Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd edn. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Wu QS, Levy Y, Zou YN (2009) Arbuscular mycorrhizae and water relations in citrus. In: Tennant P, Benkeblia N (eds) Citrus II. Tree and forstry science biotechnology 3(Special Issue):105–112Google Scholar
- Yang Y, Tang M, Sulpice R, Chen H, Tian S, Ban Y (2014) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter fractal dimension characteristics of Robinia pseudoacacia L. seedlings through regulating plant growth, leaf water status, photosynthesis, and nutrient concentration under drought stress. J Plant Growth Regul 33:612–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar