Prediction of plant water status in almond and walnut trees using a continuous leaf monitoring system
- 182 Downloads
Persistent drought conditions in the Central valley of California demands efficient irrigation scheduling tools such as precision or variable rate irrigation (VRI). To assist VRI scheduling, an experiment was conducted in almond and walnut orchards using a sensor system called ‘leaf monitor’, which was developed at UC Davis to detect plant water status. A Modified Crop Water Stress Index (MCWSI) was calculated to quantify plant water status using leaf temperature and environmental data collected by the leaf monitor. This technique also took into account spatio-temporal variability of plant water status. Stem water potential (SWP), which is considered a standard method for determining plant water stress (PWS), was also measured simultaneously. Relationships between measured deficit stem water potential (DSWP), which is the difference between SWP and the saturated baseline, and MCWSI were developed for both crops based on data collected during the 2013 and 2014 growing seasons. A linear relationship was found in the case of walnut crop with a coefficient of determination (r2) value of 0.67. A quadratic relationship was found in the case of almonds with a coefficient of multiple determination (R2) value of 0.75. Moreover, these results highlighted that at lower PWS of below 0.5 MPa of DSWP, almonds crops did not show any decrease in transpiration rate. However, when the stress level exceeded 0.5 MPa of DSWP, transpiration rate tended to decrease. On the other hand, walnut crop showed decrease in transpiration rate even at low PWS of below 0.5 MPa of DSWP. Temporal variability was noticed in PWS as it was found that coefficients of saturation baseline used for MCWSI method changed significantly throughout the season. MCWSI values estimated before an irrigation event was used to calculate the irrigation amount for low frequency variable rate irrigation (VRI) based on the relationship found between MCWSI and DSWP, and VRI led to an average 39% reduction in water usage as compared to the fixed 100% ET replacement irrigation method for all trees. Based on the results, leaf monitor showed potential for use as an irrigation scheduling tool.
KeywordsLeaf monitor Modified CWSI Irrigation scheduling Variable rate irrigation (VRI) Stem water potential (SWP) Nut crops
The authors acknowledge National Institute of Food and Agriculture grant programs (SCRI-USDA-NIFA No. 2010-01213) for the financial support to conduct these research activities.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Mention of trade names of products do not constitute endorsement of the products by the authors or the University of California Davis.
- Bréda, N., & Granier, A. (1996). Intra-and interannual variations of transpiration, leaf area index and radial growth of a sessile oak stand (Quercus petraea). In Annales des sciences forestières (Vol. 53, No. 2–3, pp. 521–536). Les Ulis: EDP Sciences.Google Scholar
- Dhillon, R. (2015). Development and evaluation of a continuous leaf monitoring system for measurement of plant water status. PhD dissertation, Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
- Dhillon, R., Udompetaikul, V., Rojo, F., Roach, J., Upadhyaya, S., Slaughter, D., et al. (2014). Detection of plant water stress using leaf temperature and microclimatic measurements in almond, walnut and grape crops. Transactions of the ASABE, 57(1), 297–304.Google Scholar
- Fulton, A., Buchner, R., Olson, B., Schwankl, L., Giles, C., Bertagna, N., et al. (2002). Rapid equilibration of leaf and stem water potential under field conditions in almonds, walnuts, and prunes. HortTechnology, 11(4), 609–615.Google Scholar
- Goldhamer, D. A. (2005). Tree water requirements and regulated deficit irrigation. In L. Ferguson (Ed.), Pistachio production manual (4th ed., pp. 103–116). Davis: Fruit and Nut Research and Information Center, University of California.Google Scholar
- Gonzalez-Dugo, V., Ruz, C., Testi, L., Orgaz, F., & Fereres, E. (2018). The impact of deficit irrigation on transpiration and yield of mandarin and late oranges. Irrigation Science, 1–13.Google Scholar
- Jimenez-Berni, M. J. (2013). Variable rate irrigation: Design of control software and field evaluation in California orchards. Master’s thesis, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
- Köksal, E. S., Candoğan, B. N., Yildirim, Y. E., & Yazgan, S. (2010). Determination of water use and water stress of cherry trees based on canopy temperature, leaf water potential and resistance. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 97(4), 57–64.Google Scholar
- Kutner, M., Nachtsheim, C., Neter, J., & Li, W. (2005). Chapter 19: Applied linear statistical models (5th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill/Irwin Series. ISBN 0-07-238688-6.Google Scholar
- Rojo, F., Dhillon, R. Upadhyaya, S., Jenkins, B., Lampinen, B., Roach, J., & Metcalf, S. (2014). Modeling canopy light interception for estimating potential yield in almond and walnut trees. ASABE paper number 141896144, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (July 13–16, 2014).Google Scholar
- Swain, D. L., Tsiang, M., Haugen, M., Singh, D., Charland, A., Rajaratnam, B., et al. (2014). The extraordinary California drought of 2013/2014: Character, context, and the role of climate change. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 95(9), S3.Google Scholar
- Torre-Neto, A., Schueller, J. K., & Haman, D. Z. (2000). Networked sensing and valve actuation for spatially-variable microsprinkler irrigation. Networked sensing and valve actuation for spatially-variable microsprinkler irrigation. 1–17.Google Scholar
- Udompetaikul, V. (2012). Development of a sensor suite for plant water status determination for irrigation management in specialty crops. PhD dissertation, Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar