Advertisement

Precision Agriculture

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 663–674 | Cite as

Optimal placement of proximal sensors for precision irrigation in tree crops

  • Claudio Leones BazziEmail author
  • Kelyn Schenatto
  • Shrinivasa Upadhyaya
  • Francisco Rojo
  • Erin Kizer
  • Channing Ko-Madden
Article
  • 151 Downloads

Abstract

Soil water or plant water status-based precision irrigation has the potential to improve water productivity. In this study, the question of number as well as placement of proximal sensors called leaf monitors that provide plant water status information has been addressed, to assist in implementation of precision irrigation. To accomplish this task, an algorithm based on the Fuzzy C-Means logic that utilized spatial variability in soil and plant attributes was developed. First, stable soil properties such as soil texture, digital elevation and apparent soil electrical conductivity data were used to create management zones (MZ). Following the creation of MZ, stem water potential data from an almond orchard and a vineyard located in California were used to determine number as well as the placement location of sensors within each MZ. The methodology and algorithm developed successfully indicated the number of sensors that need to be used and the location of the trees where the sensors should be installed.

Keywords

Precision irrigation Management zones Proximal sensors Optimal placement of sensors 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support received from California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA), Almond Board of California, E & J Gallo Wineries and Technological Federal University of Paraná to conduct this study.

References

  1. Bazzi, C. L., Souza, E. G., Uribe-Opazo, M. A., Nóbrega, L. H. P., & Rocha, D. M. (2013). Management zones definition using soil chemical and physical attributes in a soybean area. Engenharia Agricola, 34(1), 952–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bezdek, C. J. (1981). Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boydell, B., & McBratney, A. B. (2002). Identifying potential within-field management zones from cotton-yield estimates. Precision Agriculture, 3(1), 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Camp, C. R., & Sadler, E. J. (1998). Site-specific crop management with a center pivot. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 53, 312–314.Google Scholar
  5. Corwin, D. L., & Lesch, S. M. (2003). Application of soil electrical conductivity to precision agriculture: Theory, principles and guidelines. Agronomy Journal, 95, 455–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dhillon, R. S., Upadhyaya, S. K., Rojo, F., Roach, J., Coates, R. W., & Delwiche, M. J. (2017). Development of a continuous leaf monitoring system to predict plant water status. Transactions of ASABE, 60(1), 1445–1455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dobermann, A., Ping, J. L., Adamchuk, V. I., Simbahan, G. C., & Ferguson, R. B. (2003). Classification of crop yield variability in irrigated production fields. Agronomy Journal, 95(1), 1105–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doerge, T. A. (1999). Management zone concepts. The site-specific management guidelines. University South Dakota, Brokings, SD, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Driemeier, C., Ling, L. Y., Sanches, G. M., Pontes, A. O., Magalhaes, P. S. G., & Ferreira, J. E. (2016). A computational environment to support research in sugarcane agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 130, 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fereres, E., & Connor, D. (2004). Sustainable water management in agriculture. In Cabrera Cobacho (Ed.), Challenges of the new water policies for the XXI century (pp. 157–170). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  11. Fereres, E., & Soriano, M. A. (2007). Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(1), 147–159.Google Scholar
  12. Fischer, G., Tubiello, F. N., van Velthuizen, H., & Wiberg, D. A. (2007). Climate change impacts on irrigation water requirements: Effects of mitigation, 1990–2080. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(1), 1083–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fridgen, J. J., Kitchen, N. R., Sudduth, K. A., Drummond, S. T., Wiebold, W. J., & Fraisse, C. W. (2004). Management zone analyst (MZA): Software for subfield management zone delineation. Agronomy Journal, 96, 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Islam, M. M., Saey, T., Meerschman, E., De Smedt, P., Meeuws, F., Van De Vijver, E., et al. (2011). Delineating water management zones in a paddy rice field using a Floating Soil Sensing System. Agricultural Water Management, 102, 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Journel, A., & Huijbregts, C. (1978). Mining geostatistics (1st ed.). New York, USA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kizer, E., Upadhyaya, S., Dreschler, K., Ko-Madden, C., & Meyers, J. (2017). Is your tree thirsty? Precision irrigation for water savings. Resource Magazine, 24(4), 6–7.Google Scholar
  17. Ko-Madden, C. (2016). Optimal placement of minimal number of proximal sensors for precision irrigation management (Thesis). University of California, Davis, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  18. Moral, F. J., Terrón, J. M., & Silva, J. R. M. (2010). Delineation of management zones using mobile measurements of soil apparent electrical conductivity and multivariate geostatistical techniques. Soil & Tillage Research, 106(2), 335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nijbroek, R., Gerrit, H., & James, W. J. (2003). Optimizing irrigation management for a spatially variable soybean field. Agricultural Systems, 76(1), 359–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peralta, R. P., & Costa, J. L. (2013). Delineation of management zones with soil apparent electrical conductivity to improve nutrient management. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture, 99(1), 218–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rojo, F., Kizer, E., Upadhyaya, S., Ozmen, S., Ko-Madden, C., & Zhang, Q. (2016). A leaf monitoring system for continuous measurement of plant water status to assist in precision irrigation in grape and almond crops. International Federation of Automatic Control, 49(16), 209–215.Google Scholar
  22. Schepers, A. R., Shanahan, J. F., Liebig, M. A., Schepers, J. S., Johnson, S. H., & Luchiari, A. (2004). Appropriateness of management zones for characterizing spatial variability of soil properties and irrigated corn yields across years. Agronomy Journal, 96(1), 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sudduth, K. A., Kitchen, N. R., Wiebold, W. J., Batchelor, W. D., Bollero, G. A., Bullock, D. G., et al. (2005). Relating apparent electrical conductivity to soil properties across the north-central USA. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 46(1), 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Upadhyaya, S. K., Kizer, E., Ko-Madden, C., Rojo, F., Drechsler, K., & Meyres, J. (2017). Precision irrigation in orchard crops based on plant water status. Progressive Crop Consultant.  https://doi.org/10.26545/ajpr.2018.b00015x.Google Scholar
  25. Williams, B. G., & Hoey, D. (1987). The use of electromagnetic induction to detect the spatial variability of the salt and clay contents of soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 25(1), 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xiang, L., Pan, Y., Ge, Z., & Zhao, C. (2007). Delineation and scale effect of precision agriculture management zones using yield monitor data over four years. Agriculture Sciences in China, 6(2), 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yan, L., Zhou, S., Cifang, W., Hongyi, L., & Feng, L. (2007). Classification of management zones for precision farming in saline soil based on multi-data sources to characterize spatial variability of soil properties. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 23(8), 84–89.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudio Leones Bazzi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kelyn Schenatto
    • 2
  • Shrinivasa Upadhyaya
    • 3
  • Francisco Rojo
    • 4
  • Erin Kizer
    • 3
  • Channing Ko-Madden
    • 3
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUTFPR - MDMedianeiraBrazil
  2. 2.Computer Science DepartmentUTFPR - SHSanta HelenaBrazil
  3. 3.Biological and Agricultural Engineering DepartmentUC DavisDavisUSA
  4. 4.Escuela de AgronomíaPontificia Universidad Católica de ValparaísoQuillotaChile

Personalised recommendations