Spectral indices from aerial images and their relationship with properties of a corn crop

Technical Note
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

Identification of areas with similar restrictions to crop productivity could improve the efficiency to manage agricultural systems, guarantee stable yields, and reduce the effect of droughts in rainfed systems. The ability of any vegetation index to discriminate N and moisture-related changes in leaf reflectance would present an important advantage over the present diagnostic system which involves soil-testing for moisture and available N. The purpose of the study was to calibrate different vegetation indices regarding their capacity to identify water and nitrogen availability for rainfed corn crops in the semiarid Pampas of Argentina. A field experiment with corn with a control without fertilization (N0), and fertilized with 120 kg ha−1 of nitrogen (N120) was used. Two sites, Low (L) and High (H), were identified within the field, according to their altimetry, a multi-spectral aerial photography was taken from a manned airplane during flowering stage of the corn crop, and four spectral indices were calculated (NDVI, green NDVI, NGRDI, (NIR/GREEN)-1). At six georeferenced points at each site soil texture, organic matter, available phosphorus, nitrogen and moisture contents as well as corn aerial biomass and grain yield were determined. The two sites differed in most of the evaluated soil properties, crop biomass and grain yield. The spectral information obtained at crop flowering showed clear differences between sites H and L for all four indices, indicating that any of these would be able to detect the differences in soil moisture and fertility among these environments. Both (NIR/GREEN)-1 and green NDVI had the best correlation with crop yield determined in the field, and therefore could be considered most appropriate for estimating corn yields from images taken at flowering. For estimation of N requirements, green NDVI differentiated best between fertilized and non-fertilized crop in the moisture limited environment (H), while (NIR/GREEN)-1 performed better in the site where soil moisture was non-limiting (L).

Keywords

Vegetation indices Multispectral images Corn yield Nitrogen fertilization response 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present study was financed by internal funds of INTA Anguil Experimental Station.

References

  1. Adams, M. L., Philpot, W. D., & Norvell, W. A. (1999). Yellowness index: An application of spectral second derivatives to estimate chlorosis of leaves in stressed vegetation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20, 3663–3675.  https://doi.org/10.1080/014311699211264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araus, J. L., & Cairns, J. E. (2014). Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. Trends in Plant Science, 19, 52–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Børgesen, C. D., & Schaap, M. G. (2005). Point and parameter pedotransfer functions for water retention predictions for Danish soils. Geoderma, 127, 154–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.11.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter, G. A., & Spiering, B. A. (2002). Optical properties of intact leaves for estimating chlorophyll content. Journal of Environment Quality, 31, 1424.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2002.1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Di Rienzo, J. A., Casanoves, F., Balzarini, M., Gonzalez, L., Tablada, M., Robledo, C. (2013). Infostat-sofware estadístico. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina [WWW Document].Google Scholar
  6. Gili, A., Álvarez, C., Bagnato, R., & Noellemeyer, E. (2017). Comparison of three methods for delineating management zones for site-specific crop management. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 139, 213–223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.05.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gitelson, A. A. (2004). Wide dynamic range vegetation index for remote quantification of biophysical characteristics of vegetation. Journal of Plant Physiology, 161, 165–173.  https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-01176.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gitelson, A. A., Gritz, Y., & Merzlyak, M. N. (2003). Relationships between leaf chlorophyll content and spectral reflectance and algorithms for non-destructive chlorophyll assessment in higher plant leaves. Journal of Plant Physiology, 160, 271–282.  https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00887.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gitelson, A. A., Kaufman, Y. J., & Merzlyak, M. N. (1996). Use of a green channel in remote sensing of global vegetation from EOS-MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment, 58, 289–298.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00072-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gitelson, A. A., Keydan, G. P., & Merzlyak, M. N. (2006). Three-band model for noninvasive estimation of chlorophyll, carotenoids and anthocyanin contens in higher plant leaves. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L11402.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gitelson, A. A., Peng, Y., Arkebauer, T. J., & Schepers, J. (2014). Relationships between gross primary production, green LAI, and canopy chlorophyll content in maize: Implications for remote sensing of primary production. Remote Sensing of Environment, 144, 65–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hatfield, J. L., Kanemasu, E. T., Asrar, G., Jackson, R. D., Pinter, P. J., Reginato, R. J., et al. (1985). Leaf-area estimates from spectral measurements over various planting dates of wheat. International Journal of Remote Sensing.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168508948432.Google Scholar
  13. Kokaly, R. F., Asner, G. P., Ollinger, S. V., Martin, M. E., & Wessman, C. A. (2009). Characterizing canopy biochemistry from imaging spectroscopy and its application to ecosystem studies. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, S78–S91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.10.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Main, R., Cho, M. A., Mathieu, R., O’Kennedy, M. M., Ramoelo, A., & Koch, S. (2011). An investigation into robust spectral indices for leaf chlorophyll estimation. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66, 751–761.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Majnooni-Heris, A., Zand-Parsa, S., Sepaskhah, A. R., Kamgar-Haghighi, A. A., & Yasrebi, J. (2011). Modification and validation of maize simulation model (MSM) at different applied water and nitrogen levels under furrow irrigation. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340903512553.Google Scholar
  16. Maynard, J. J., & Levi, M. R. (2017). Hyper-temporal remote sensing for digital soil mapping: Characterizing soil-vegetation response to climatic variability. Geoderma, 285, 94–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.09.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Monzon, J. P., Sadras, V. O., & Andrade, F. H. (2012). Modelled yield and water use efficiency of maize in response to crop management and Southern Oscillation Index in a soil-climate transect in Argentina. Field Crops Research, 130, 8–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nasta, P., & Gates, J. B. (2013). Plot-scale modeling of soil water dynamics and impacts of drought conditions beneath rainfed maize in Eastern Nebraska. Agricultural Water Management, 128, 120–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peng, Y., & Gitelson, A. A. (2011). Application of chlorophyll-related vegetation indices for remote estimation of maize productivity. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 151, 1267–1276.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Petropoulos, G. P., & Kalaitzidis, C. (2012). Multispectral vegetation indices in remote sensing: An overview. Ecological Modeling, 2, 15–39.Google Scholar
  21. Petropoulos, G. P., Kalaitzidis, C., & Prasad Vadrevu, K. (2012). Support vector machines and object-based classification for obtaining land-use/cover cartography from Hyperion hyperspectral imagery. Computers & Geosciences, 41, 99–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.08.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramoelo, A., Dzikiti, S., van Deventer, H., Maherry, A., Cho, M. A., & Gush, M. (2015). Potential to monitor plant stress using remote sensing tools. Journal of Arid Environments, 113, 134–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ritchie, S. W., Hanway, J. J. (1982). How corn plant develops. Iowa State University of Science and Technology. Cooperative Extension Service, Ames, Iowa. Special Report No 48.Google Scholar
  24. Rouse, J. W, Hass, R. H., Schel, J. A., Deering, D. W. (1973). Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. (Vol. 1, pp. 309–317). Third ERTS Symposium, NASA SP.Google Scholar
  25. Sadras, V. O. (2004). Yield and water-use efficiency of water- and nitrogen-stressed wheat crops increase with degree of co-limitation. European Journal of Agronomy, 21, 455–464.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2004.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schaap, M., & Nemes, A. (2004). Comparison of models for indirect estimation of water retention and available water in surface soils. Vadose Zone, 1463, 1455–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seddaiu, G., Iocola, I., Farina, R., Orsini, R., Iezzi, G., & Roggero, P. P. (2016). Long term effects of tillage practices and N fertilization in rainfed Mediterranean cropping systems: urum wheat, sunflower and maize grain yield. European Journal of Agronomy, 77, 166–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.02.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tremblay, N., Bouroubi, Y. M., Bélec, C., Mullen, R. W., Kitchen, N. R., Thomason, W. E., et al. (2012). Corn response to nitrogen is influenced by soil texture and weather. Agronomy Journal.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0184.Google Scholar
  29. Tucker, C. J. (1979). Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 8, 127–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. USDA-NRCS. (2014). Claves para la Taxonomía de Suelos.Google Scholar
  31. Verrelst, J., Camps-Valls, G., Muñoz-Marí, J., Rivera, J. P., Veroustraete, F., Clevers, J. G. P. W., et al. (2015). Optical remote sensing and the retrieval of terrestrial vegetation bio-geophysical properties: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 108, 273–290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weber, V. S., Araus, J. L., Cairns, J. E., Sanchez, C., Melchinger, A. E., & Orsini, E. (2012). Prediction of grain yield using reflectance spectra of canopy and leaves in maize plants grown under different water regimes. Field Crops Research, 128, 82–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zand-Parsa, S., Sepaskhah, A. R., & Ronaghi, A. (2006). Development and evaluation of integrated water and nitrogen model for maize. Agricultural Water Management.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.03.010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute for Agricultural Technology (INTA), Anguil Experimental StationAnguilArgentina
  2. 2.Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad Nacional de La PampaSanta RosaArgentina

Personalised recommendations