Advertisement

Modelling the dynamics between tour-based mode choices and tour-timing choices in daily activity scheduling

  • Md Sami HasnineEmail author
  • Khandker Nurul Habib
Article
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

The paper presents a dynamic discrete–continuous modelling approach to capture individuals’ tour-based mode choices and continuous time expenditure choices tradeoffs in a 24-h time frame. The analysis of traditional activity-based models are typically limited to activity-type, location and time expenditure choices. Besides, mode choice is often simplified to fit in a pre-defined activity schedule. However, decisions of tour departure time, tour mode choice and time expenditure choice for out-of-home activities are intricately inter-related, and common unobserved attributes influence these choices. This paper proposes a random utility maximization based dynamic discrete–continuous model for joint tour based mode and tour timing choices. Tour timing choice is modelled as continuous time allocation/consumption choice under 24-h time-budget. In the case of the tour-based mode choice component, it uses a modelling structure which harnesses the power of dynamic programming and discrete choice. A cross-sectional household travel survey dataset collected in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area in 2016 is employed for the empirical investigation in this study. Empirical model shows the capability of handling all possible mode combinations within a tour including ride-hailing services (e.g., Uber, Lyft). Empirical results reveal that individuals variations in time expenditure choice are defined by activity type, employment status, and vehicle ownership. In terms of mode choice, it is clear the emerging transportation service users have different travel pattern than conventional mode users. This modelling framework has the potential to test a wide range of policies.

Keywords

Dynamic discrete–continuous modelling Time expenditure choice Tour-based mode choice Tour departure time Uber Ride-hailing 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The study was partially funded by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Graduate Scholarship and a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery grant. Authors are grateful to the Data Management Group (DMG) of the University of Toronto for sharing the dataset. Useful discussions of Islam Kamel, Teddy Lin and Chris Stogios are acknowledged during the research. All views and opinions are authors’ own.

Authors’ contribution

Md Sami Hasnine: Dataset preparation, econometric model estimation, validation and policy scenario testing. Mr. Hasnine contributed to the manuscript. Prof. Khandker Nurul Habib: Prof. Khandker Nurul Habib contributed to the manuscript and supervised the project.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aptech Systems: Gauss User’s Manual. Maple Valley, CA (2018). http://www.aptech.com Accessed June 2018
  2. Aguirregabiria, V., Mira, P.: Swapping the nested fixed point algorithm: a class of estimators for discrete Markov decision models. Econometrica 70(4), 1519–1543 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. Aguirregabiria, V., Mira, P.: Sequential estimation of dynamic discrete games. Econometrica 75(1), 1–53 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. Bowman, J.L., Ben-Akiva, M.E.: Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 35(1), 1–28 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. Bowman, J., Bradley, M., Shiftan, Y., Lawton, T., Ben-Akiva, M.: Demonstration of an activity-based model for Portland. In: World Transport Research: Selected Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Transport Research 1998, vol. 3. (pp. 171–184.) Oxford: Elsevier (1999)Google Scholar
  6. Bhat, C.R., Goulias, K.G., Pendyala, R.M., Paleti, R., Sidharthan, R., Schmitt, L., Hu, H.H.: A household-level activity pattern generation model with an application for Southern California. Transportation 40(5), 1063–1086 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. Bhat, C.R., Srinivasan, S., Sen, S.: A joint model for the perfect and imperfect substitute goods case: application to activity time-use decisions. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 40(10), 827–850 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. Bhat, C.R., Sen, S.: Household vehicle type holdings and usage: an application of the multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 40(1), 35–53 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. Bhat, C.R.: A multiple discrete–continuous extreme value model: formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 39(8), 679–707 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. Bhat, C., Guo, J., Srinivasan, S., Sivakumar, A.: Comprehensive econometric microsimulator for daily activity-travel patterns. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 1894, 57–66 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. Bhat, C.R.: Analysis of travel mode and departure time choice for urban shopping trips. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 32(6), 361–371 (1998)Google Scholar
  12. Bradley, M., Bowman, J.L., Griesenbeck, B.: SACSIM: an applied activity-based model system with fine-level spatial and temporal resolution. J. Choice Model. 3(1), 5–31 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. Davidson, W., Vovsha, P., Freedman, J., Donnelly, R.: CT-RAMP family of activity-based models. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF) Canberra, Australia, 29, 29 Sept–1 Oct (2010)Google Scholar
  14. Ding, C., Mishra, S., Lin, Y., Xie, B.: Cross-nested joint model of travel mode and departure time choice for urban commuting trips: case study in Maryland-Washington, DC Region. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 141(4), 04014036 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. Habib, K.M.N.: A comprehensive utility-based system of travel options modelling (CUSTOM) considering dynamic time-budget constrained Potential Path Area (PPA) in activity scheduling process: application in modelling worker’s daily activity-travel schedules. Transportmetr. Part A: Transp. Sci. 14(4), 292–315 (2018)Google Scholar
  16. Habib, K.N., El-Assi, W., Hasnine, M.S., Lamers, J.: Daily activity-travel scheduling behaviour of non-workers in the National Capital Region (NCR) of Canada. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 97, 1–16 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. Habib, K.M.N.: A joint discrete-continuous model considering budget constraint for the continuous part: application in joint mode and departure time choice modelling. Transportmetr. A: Transp. Sci. 9(2), 149–177 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. Habib, K.M.N.: Modeling commuting mode choice jointly with work start time and work duration. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 46(1), 33–47 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. Habib, K.M.N.: A random utility maximization (RUM) based dynamic activity scheduling model: application in weekend activity scheduling. Transportation 38(1), 123–151 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. Hasnine, M.S., Lin, T., Weiss, A., Habib, K.N.: Determinants of travel mode choices of post-secondary students in a large metropolitan area: the case of the city of Toronto. J. Transp. Geogr. 70, 161–171 (2018)Google Scholar
  21. Hasnine, M.S., Habib, K.N.: What about the dynamics in daily travel mode choices? A dynamic discrete choice approach for tour-based mode choice modelling. Transp. Policy 71, 70–80 (2018)Google Scholar
  22. Hasnine, M.S., Kamel, I., & Habib, K.N.: Using Google Map to impute transportation level-of-service attributes: application in mode and departure time choice modelling. In: 11th International Conference on Transport Survey Methods, Esterel, Quebec, Canada, Sept 24–29 (2017)Google Scholar
  23. Jara-Díaz, S.R.: On the goods-activities technical relations in the time allocation theory. Transportation 30(3), 245–260 (2003)Google Scholar
  24. Miller, E.J., Roorda, M.J., Carrasco, J.A.: A tour-based model of travel mode choice. Transportation 32(4), 399–422 (2005)Google Scholar
  25. Munizaga, M.A., Correia, R., Jara-Díaz, S.R.De, Dios Ortúzar, J.: Valuing time with a joint mode choice-activity model. Int. J. Transp. Econ. 33, 1000–1018 (2006)Google Scholar
  26. Pesaran, M.H., Tosetti, E.: Large panels with common factors and spatial correlation. J. Econom. 161(2), 182–202 (2011)Google Scholar
  27. Pinjari, A.R., & Bhat, C.: An efficient forecasting procedure for Kuhn–Tucker consumer demand model systems. Technical paper. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida (2010)Google Scholar
  28. Ruiter, E.R., Ben-Akiva, M.: Disaggregate travel demand models for the San Francisco Bay area. Transp. Res. Rec. 673, 121–128 (1978)Google Scholar
  29. Rust, J.: Optimal replacement of GMC bus engines: an empirical model of Harold Zurcher. Econom. J. Econom. Soc. 55(5), 999 (1987)Google Scholar
  30. Shabanpour, R., Golshani, N., Derrible, S., Mohammadian, A., Miralinaghi, M.: Joint discrete-continuous model of travel mode and departure time choices. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2669, 41–51 (2017)Google Scholar
  31. Spissu, E., Pinjari, A.R., Bhat, C.R., Pendyala, R.M., Axhausen, K.W.: An analysis of weekly out-of-home discretionary activity participation and time-use behavior. Transportation 36(5), 483–510 (2009)Google Scholar
  32. Swait, J., Adamowicz, W., Van Bueren, M.: Choice and temporal welfare impacts: incorporating history into discrete choice models. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 47(1), 94–116 (2004)Google Scholar
  33. Vovsha, P., Bradley, M.: Hybrid discrete choice departure-time and duration model for scheduling travel tours. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 1894, 46–56 (2004)Google Scholar
  34. Yang, L., Zheng, G., Zhu, X.: Cross-nested logit model for the joint choice of residential location, travel mode, and departure time. Habitat Int. 38, 157–166 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations