Advertisement

The influence of variable message signs on en-route diversion between a toll highway and a free competing alternative

  • Fernando RomeroEmail author
  • Juan Gomez
  • Thais Rangel
  • Rafael Jurado-Piña
  • José Manuel Vassallo
Article

Abstract

In the field of road transport, Advanced Traveller Information Systems represent a relevant tool to manage road traffic, improve drivers’ utility and make a more efficient use of transport infrastructure. Due to the growing sources of en-route information available nowadays, it is crucial to understand better its influence on drivers’ behaviour, particularly with regard to route choice. Previous research in this field has mainly focused on the provision of en-route information in toll-free environments. However, few researches have explored its influence when a tolled alternative is available. This paper is aimed at exploring the influence of variable message signs (VMS) information on drivers’ route choice, made between a free highway and a competing tolled alternative. To that end, we develop a binary logit analysis based on empirical data from the metropolitan area of Madrid, Spain. Results show that the type of information provided to drivers through VMS panels significantly influences their route choice when one of the alternatives is tolled. Furthermore, some combinations of messages, such as adding travel time estimates together with incident messages, greatly increase the diversion rate to the tolled route. The research also offers evidence that the influence of the information provided changes according to the type of day, which may be related to traffic conditions, and to the different types of user characteristic of weekday and weekend mobility.

Keywords

Advanced traveller information systems Route choice Route diversion Toll road Variable message sign 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Spanish Ministry of Public Works and Transport (Subdirección General de Explotación y Gestión de Red, Dirección General de Carreteras, Ministerio de Fomento), the National Traffic Authority (Dirección General de Tráfico) and the State Meteorological Agency (AEMET), Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Environment for providing the data for conducting this research. The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their efforts in providing comments and suggestions to improve the paper.

Author’s contributions

FR: Literature search and review, case study design and manuscript writing. JG: Manuscript writing, study conception and content planning. TR: Theoretical development, analytic calculations and model derivation. RJ-P: Acquisition and interpretation of data. JMV: Study conception, content planning and critical revision.

Funding

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Grant TRA2015-64723-R (MINECO/FEDER). This research was also possible thanks to the research grant awarded to the first author (BES-2016-077150) by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) and co-financed by the European Social Fund.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdel-Aty, M., Abdalla, M.F.: Modeling drivers’ diversion from normal routes under ATIS using generalized estimating equations and binomial probit link function. Transportation 31, 327–348 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PORT.0000025396.32909.dc CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdel-Aty, M.A., Kitamura, R., Jovanis, P.P.: Using stated preference data for studying the effect of advanced traffic information on drivers’ route choice. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 5, 39–50 (1997).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00023-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed, K., Al-Zoubi, K., Siddiqui, M.A., Anas, M.: Evaluation of the effectiveness of portable variable message signs in work zones in United Arab Emirates. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 10, 114–121 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2015.0007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Deek, H., Lochrane, T.W.P., Srinivasa Ravi Chandra, C.V., Khattak, A.: Diversion during unexpected congestion on toll roads: the role of traffic information displayed on dynamic message signs. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 6, 97 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2010.0163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Deek, H., Venkata, S., Flick, J., Khattak, A.: Dynamic message sign deployment and diversion behavior of travelers on central florida toll roads. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2129, 24–34 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.3141/2129-04 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ben-Akiva, M.E., Lerman, S.R.: Discrete choice analysis : theory and application to travel demand. MIT Press, Cambridge (1985)Google Scholar
  7. Ben-Elia, E., Erev, I., Shiftan, Y.: The combined effect of information and experience on drivers’ route-choice behavior. Transportation 35, 165–177 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-007-9143-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ben-Elia, E., Shiftan, Y.: Which road do I take? A learning-based model of route-choice behavior with real-time information. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 44, 249–264 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burris, M., Nelson, S., Kelly, P., Gupta, P., Cho, Y.: Willingness to pay for high-occupancy toll lanes. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2297, 47–55 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.3141/2297-06 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cantos-Sánchez, P., Moner-Colonques, R., Sempere-Monerris, J.J., Álvarez-SanJaime, Ó.: Viability of new road infrastructure with heterogeneous users. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 45, 435–450 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chatterjee, K., Hounsell, N., Firmin, P., Bonsall, P.: Driver response to variable message sign information in London. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 10, 149–169 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(01)00008-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chatterjee, K., McDonald, M.: Effectiveness of using variable message signs to disseminate dynamic traffic information: evidence from field trails in European cities. Transp. Rev. 24, 559–585 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1080/0144164042000196080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaurand, N., Bossart, F., Delhomme, P.: A naturalistic study of the impact of message framing on highway speeding. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 35, 37–44 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Choocharukul, K.: Effects of attitudes and socioeconomic and travel characteristics on stated route diversion: structural equation modeling approach of road users in Bangkok, Thailand. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2048, 35–42 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.3141/2048-05 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Emmerink, R.H.M., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P., Van Ommeren, J.N.: Variable message signs and radio traffic information: an integrated empirical analysis of drivers’ route choice behaviour. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 30, 135–153 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-8564(95)00016-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erke, A., Sagberg, F., Hagman, R.: Effects of route guidance variable message signs (VMS) on driver behaviour. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 10, 447–457 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2007.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feng, C.M., Kuo, Y.W.: Comparative analysis of stated en-route switching behavior under various information scenarios. In: IEEE international conference on wireless communications, networking and mobile computing, 2007. 6144–6147Google Scholar
  18. Fifer, S., Rose, J., Greaves, S.: Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: is it a problem? And if so, how do we deal with it? Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 61, 164–177 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foo, S., Abdulhai, B.: Evaluating the impacts of changeable message signs on traffic diversion. In: IEEE intelligent transportation systems conference, 2006. 891–896Google Scholar
  20. Fox, J., Monette, G.: Generalized Collinearity Diagnostics. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 87, 178–183 (1992).  https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1992.10475190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gan, H., Ye, X.: Urban freeway users’ diversion response to variable message sign displaying the travel time of both freeway and local street. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 6, 78 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2011.0070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gomez, J., Vassallo, J.M., Herraiz, I.: Explaining light vehicle demand evolution in interurban toll roads: a dynamic panel data analysis in Spain. Transportation 43, 677–703 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9612-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hassan, H.M., Abdel-Aty, M.A., Choi, K., Algadhi, S.A.: Driver behavior and preferences for changeable message signs and variable speed limits in reduced visibility conditions. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 16, 132–146 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2012.691842 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hensher, D.A., Bradley, M.: Using stated response choice data to enrich revealed preference discrete choice models. Mark. Lett. 4, 139–151 (1993).  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huang, C., Burris, M.W.: The short-run impact of gas prices fluctuations on toll road use. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 3, 137–150 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2014.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang, Y., Bai, Y.: Effectiveness of graphic-aided portable changeable message signs in reducing vehicle speeds in highway work zones. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 48, 311–321 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jamson, A.H., Merat, N.: The effectiveness of safety campaign VMS messages—a driving simulator investigation. In: Proceedings of the 4th international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training, and vehicle. 459–465. Stevenson, Washington (2007)Google Scholar
  28. Jeihani, M., NarooieNezhad, S., Bakhsh Kelarestaghi, K.: Integration of a driving simulator and a traffic simulator case study: exploring drivers’ behavior in response to variable message signs. IATSS Res. 41, 164–171 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2017.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knorr, F., Chmura, T., Schreckenberg, M.: Route choice in the presence of a toll road: the role of pre-trip information and learning. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 27, 44–55 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kusakabe, T., Sharyo, T., Asakura, Y.: Effects of traffic incident information on drivers’ route choice behaviour in urban expressway network. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 54, 179–188 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.737 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li, X., Cao, Y., Zhao, X., Xie, D.: Drivers’ diversion from expressway under real traffic condition information shown on variable message signs. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 19, 2262–2270 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0692-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ma, Z., Shao, C., Song, Y., Chen, J.: Driver response to information provided by variable message signs in Beijing. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 26, 199–209 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Matas, A., Raymond, J.-L., Ruiz, A.: Traffic forecasts under uncertainty and capacity constraints. Transportation 39, 1–17 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9325-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Niu, D., Sun, J.: Eco-driving versus green wave speed guidance for signalized highway traffic: a multi-vehicle driving simulator study. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 96, 1079–1090 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ortúzar, J. de D., Willumsen, L.G.: Modelling Transport. Wiley, Chichester, UK (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119993308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Petrella, M., Lappin, J.: Comparative analysis of customer response to online traffic information in two cities: Los Angeles, California, and Seattle, Washington. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1886, 10–17 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.3141/1886-02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Poulopoulou, M., Spyropoulou, I., Antoniou, C.: Parameters affecting professional driver response to VMS messages. In: IEEE 18th international conference on intelligent transportation systems, 2015. 1563–1568Google Scholar
  38. Rämä, P., Kulmala, R.: Effects of variable message signs for slippery road conditions on driving speed and headways. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 3, 85–94 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1369-8478(00)00018-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schroeder, J.L., Demetsky, M.J.: Data analysis of diversion and dynamic message signs. J. Transp. Eng. 137, 608–614 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spyropoulou, I., Antoniou, C.: Determinants of driver response to variable message sign information in Athens. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 9, 453–466 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2014.0053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Toledo, T., Beinhaker, R.: Evaluation of the potential benefits of advanced traveler information systems. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 10, 173–183 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450600981033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. TRB (Transportation Research Board): Highway Capacity Manual—a guide for multimodal mobility analysis (6th Edition). Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington (2016)Google Scholar
  43. Tsirimpa, A., Polydoropoulou, A., Antoniou, C.: Development of a mixed multi-nomial logit model to capture the impact of information systems on travelers’ switching behavior. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 11, 79–89 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450701293882 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vassallo, J.M., Ortega, A., Baeza, M.D.L.Á.: Impact of the economic recession on toll highway concessions in Spain. J. Manag. Eng. 28, 398–406 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wardman, M., Bonsall, P.W., Shires, J.D.: Driver response to variable message signs: a stated preference investigation. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 5, 389–405 (1997).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(98)00004-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Xu, T., Sun, L., Peng, Z.-R.: Empirical analysis and modeling of drivers’ response to variable message signs in Shanghai, China. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2243, 99–107 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.3141/2243-12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xuan, Y.E., Kanafani, A.: Evaluation of the effectiveness of accident information on freeway changeable message signs: a comparison of empirical methodologies. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 48, 158–171 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.08.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yan, X., Wu, J.: Effectiveness of variable message signs on driving behavior based on a driving simulation experiment. Discret. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2014, 1–9 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/206805 Google Scholar
  49. Yim, Y., Ygnace, J.-L.: Link flow evaluation using loop detector data: traveler response to variable-message signs. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1550, 58–64 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.3141/1550-08 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang, G., Wang, Z., Persad, K.R., Walton, C.M.: Enhanced traffic information dissemination to facilitate toll road utilization: a nested logit model of a stated preference survey in Texas. Transportation 41, 231–249 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9449-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhong, S., Zhou, L., Ma, S., Jia, N.: Effects of different factors on drivers’ guidance compliance behaviors under road condition information shown on VMS. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 46, 1490–1505 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.05.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Investigación del Transporte (TRANSyT)Universidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Ingeniería del Transporte, Territorio y Urbanismo, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y PuertosUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations