Advertisement

Effectiveness of Gravity Goods Ropeways in market participation of smallholder farmers in uplands

  • Diwakar KCEmail author
  • Tek Maraseni
  • Chubamenla Jamir
  • Ritendra Thapa Magar
  • Florencia Tuladhar
Article

Abstract

Isolated from the market due to harsh terrain, low farm productivity and poor road connectivity, the majority of farmers in the upland region of Nepal practice subsistence farming characterized by abject poverty. This study investigates whether Gravity Goods Ropeway (GGR) improves market participation and livelihood of smallholder farmers in uplands. 113 households’ surveys, 6 focus group discussions, and 39 key informant interviews were conducted in 3 upland villages of Nepal. The before–after analysis was applied to examine the impact of GGR. With reduced average travel time to end market by 57% (p < 0.05), the farmers were able to transport high-quality products directly to small-scale (retailers and consumer) and large-scale (wholesaler) buyers eliminating the role of intermediaries. Additionally, GGR significantly reduced transportation cost by 43% (p < 0.05), post-harvest loss by 39% (p < 0.05), and time for information search enabling farmers to dictate and capture higher share in final selling price. The average quantity of high-value crops (vegetable) supplied to the output market (84%), farm income (84%) and food expenditure (31%) increased significantly (p < 0.05) fulfilling the food needs of upland farmers for the entire year through the increased purchase of rice, pulses and processed food. Unlike the output market, the farmers’ participation in purchasing fertilizer, seeds and other equipment in the input market remained low as they continued to rely on traditional methods because of low cost and local applicability. Therefore, GGR could be one of the suitable technology for upland of Nepal. However, further research is required focusing on the financial (cost/benefit) aspect, a possibility of improving the technology and operation mechanism which will genuinely justify that GGR is a suitable technology in mountain regions of Nepal and elsewhere with similar topographic conditions.

Keywords

Gravity Goods Ropeways Smallholder farmers Market participation Travel time 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We want to extend our sincerest thanks to Global food Center for Food System Innovation at Michigan State University for funding this research. We are grateful to the TERI School of Advanced Studies for facilitating the study. Our sincere gratitude to Practical Action Nepal for providing access to the study areas. We extend our appreciation to the local communities and all the respondents in the study areas for their enthusiasm in sharing their knowledge and experiences on GGR.

Author’s contribution

KCD: Methodology design, data collection and field survey, literature survey, data analysis, and manuscript writing; TM: analysis, manuscript writing, and editing; CJ: Methodology design, analysis and content planning; RTM: Methodology design, literature survey, and finalization of questionnaires; FT: literature survey, analysis, and mapping.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ADB.: Proposed loan for additional financing Nepal-Community-managed irrigated agriculture sector project (2014)Google Scholar
  2. ADB.: Country poverty analysis: Nepal. Asian Development Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal (2017)Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed, R., Hossain, M.: Developmental Impact of Rural Infrastructure in Bangladesh. International Food Policy Research Institute, Dhaka (1990)Google Scholar
  4. Altheide, D.L.: Reflections: ethnographic content analysis. Qual. Sociol. 10, 65–77 (1987).  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988269 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, K., Masters, W.A. (eds.): Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Africa. The World Bank, Washington DC (2009)Google Scholar
  6. Årethun, T., Bhatta, B.P.: Contribution of Rural roads to access to- and participation in markets: theory and results from Northern Ethiopia. J. Transp. Technol. 02, 165–174 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2012.22018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arias, P., Morrison, J., Hallam, D., Krivonos, E.: Smallholder Integration in Changing Food Markets. FAO, Rome (2013)Google Scholar
  8. Baker, J.L.: Evaluating the Impact of Development Projects on Poverty: A Handbook for Practitioners. The World Bank, Washington DC (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baral, S.D.: Gravity Ropeway: could be a reliable source of transport the goods and services in Hills and Mountainous region of Nepal. In: 6th International Symposium “Networks for Mobility”, Stuttgart, Germany (2012)Google Scholar
  10. Barrett, C.B.: Smallholder market participation: concepts and evidence from Eastern and Southern Africa. Food Policy 33, 299–317 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Basnett, Y., Henley, G., Howell, J., Jones, H., Lemma, A., Pandey, P.R.: Structural Economic Transformation in Nepal. Department for International Development, Kathmandu (2014)Google Scholar
  12. Boughton, D., Tschirley, D., Cunguara, B., Mather, D., Barrett, C.B., Benfica, R., Abdula, D.: Market participation by rural households in a low-income country—an Asset-based approach applied to Mozambique. Faith Econ. 50, 64–101 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. Bwalya, R., Mugisha, J., Hyuha, T.: Transaction costs and smallholder household access to maize markets in Zambia. J. Dev. Agric. Econ. 5, 328–336 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.5897/JDAE12.134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chaudhary, S., Sinkemana, G.: Ropeways: Connecting rural communities [Online]. Practical Action Nepal, Kathmandu (2018). https://practicalaction.org/blog/news/campaigns/ropeways-connecting-rural-communities/comment-page-1/. Accessed 25 Dec 2018
  15. Cuevas, A.C.: Transaction costs of exchange in agriculture: a survey. Asian J. Agric. Dev. 11, 21–38 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. de Janvry, A., Fafchamps, M., Sadoulet, E.: Peasant household behavior with missing markets: some paradoxes explained. Econ. J. 101, 1400–1417 (1991).  https://doi.org/10.2307/2234892 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Walle, D.P.V., Mu, R.: Rural roads and poor area development in Vietnam. J. Dev. Stud. 47, 709–734 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220381003599436 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Devkota, R.P., Bajracharya, B., Maraseni, T.N., Cockfield, G., Upadhyay, B.P.: The perception of Nepal’s Tharu community in regard to climate change and its impacts on their livelihoods. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 68, 937–946 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2011.587282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Devkota, B., Dudycha, D., Andrey, J.: Planning for non-motorized travel in rural Nepal: a role for geographic information systems. J. Transp. Geogr. 24, 282–291 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dhakal, A., Cockfield, G., Maraseni, T.N.: Evolution of agroforestry based farming systems: a study of Dhanusha district, Nepal. Agrofor. Syst. 86, 17–33 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9504-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DOLIDAR.: Technical guidelines for gravity goods ropeways. DoLIDAR and Practical Action, Kathmandu (2010)Google Scholar
  22. Dorosh, P., Wang, H.G., You, L., Schmidt, E.: Crop Production and Road Connectivity in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Spatial Analysis. World Bank, Washington DC (2010)Google Scholar
  23. Dorward, A., Kydd, J., Morrison, J., Urey, I.: A policy agenda for pro-poor agricultural growth. World Dev. 32, 73–89 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.06.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fafchamps, M., Hill, R.: Selling at the farm-gate or traveling to market. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 87, 717–734 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00758.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fan, S., Halsema, B., Keyzer, M.: From Subsistence to Profit: Transforming Smallholder Farms. IFPRI, Washington DC (2013)Google Scholar
  26. FAO: The Future of Food and Agriculture: Trends and Challenges. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome (2017)Google Scholar
  27. Ferris, S., Robbins, P., Best, R., Seville, D., Buxton, A., Shriver, J., Wei, E.: Linking Smallholder Farmers to Markets and the Implications for Extension and Advisory Services. USAID, Washington DC (2014)Google Scholar
  28. Gabre-Madhin, E.Z.: Of Markets and Middlemen: Transforming Agricultural Markets in Ethiopia. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC (2001)Google Scholar
  29. Hong, J., Chu, Z., Wang, Q.: Transport infrastructure and regional economic growth: evidence from China. Transportation 38, 737–752 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9349-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hunzai, K., Gerlitz, J.Y., Hoermann, B.: Understanding Mountain Poverty in the Hindu Kush-Himalayas. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu (2011)Google Scholar
  31. IFAD: Rural Poverty Report—New Realities, New Challenges: New Opportunities for Tomorrow’s Generation. IFAD, Rome (2011)Google Scholar
  32. Jacoby, H.G., Minten, B.: On measuring the benefits of lower transport costs. J. Dev. Econ. 89, 28–38 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jayne, T.S., Mason, N.M., Myers, R.J., Ferris, J.N., Mather, D., Sitko, N., Beaver, M., Lenski, N., Chapoto, A., Boughton, D.: Patterns and Trends in Food Staples Markets in Eastern and Southern Africa: Toward the Identification of Priority Investments and Strategies for Developing Markets and Promoting Smallholder Productivity Growth. Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan (2010)Google Scholar
  34. Jin, H., Stoeckl, N., Zhang-yue, Z.: Poverty in Mountainous Areas in Rural China: Issues and Suggestions to Encourage Sustainable Development. In: Presented at the Managing Natural Resources in Australia, Sydney (2006)Google Scholar
  35. Jordaan, H., Grové, B., Backeberg, G.R.: Conceptual framework for value chain analysis for poverty alleviation among smallholder farmers. Agrekon 53, 1–25 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2014.887903 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Karki, R., Karki, B.: An Assessment of Market Oriented Production and Agri-Business by the Smallholders: Some Approaches and Evidences from Rural Hills of Nepal. Rural Reconstruction Nepal, Kathmandu (2011)Google Scholar
  37. Key, N., Sadoulet, E., Janvry, A.D.: Transactions costs and agricultural household supply response. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 82, 245–259 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Khandker, S., Bakht, Z., Koolwal, G.: The poverty impact of rural roads: evidence from Bangladesh. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 57, 685–722 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1086/598765 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kiprono, P., Matsumoto, T.: Roads and farming: the effect of infrastructure improvement on agricultural input use, farm productivity and market participation in Kenya. In: Presented at the CSAE Conference 2014: Economic Development in Africa, T, Oxford (2014)Google Scholar
  40. Laxman, K.C.: Gravity goods ropeway an alternative sustainable solution for rural transportation with out hampering to the natural environment and climate: a case study from Janagaun village. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, pp. 1–2. IOP Publshing Limited, Copenhagen (2009)Google Scholar
  41. Leeuw, F., Vaessen, J.: Impact Evaluations and Development: Guidance on Impact Evaluation. World Bank, Washington DC (2009)Google Scholar
  42. Lowder, S.K., Skoet, J., Raney, T.: The number, size, and distribution of farms, smallholder farms, and family farms worldwide. World Dev. 87, 16–29 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Magar, R.T.: Gravity goods ropeways: a sustainable solution for rural transportation in hilly and mountainous regions of Nepal (2016). https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1794/20424/ThapaMagar_oregon_0171N_11478.pdf?sequence=1
  44. Maraseni, T.N.: Selection of non-timber forest species for community and private plantations in the high and low altitude areas of Makawanpur District, Nepal. Small-Scale For. 7, 151–161 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-008-9047-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maraseni, T.N., Shivakoti, G.P., Cockfield, G., Apan, A.: Nepalese non-timber forest products: an analysis of the equitability of profit distribution across a supply chain to India. Small-Scale For. Econ. Manag. Policy 5, 191–206 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-006-0010-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Markelova, H., Mwangi, E.: Collective action for smallholder market access- evidence and implications for Africa. Rev. Policy Res. 27, 621–640 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00462.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Minten, B.: Infrastructure, Market Access, and Agricultural Prices: Evidence from Madagascar. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC (1999)Google Scholar
  48. Mohanty, S.K., Rasul, G., Mahapatra, B., Choudhury, D., Tuladhar, S., Holmgren, E.V.: Multidimensional poverty in mountainous regions: Shan and Chin in Myanmar. Soc. Indic. Res. 138, 23–44 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1662-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Morgan, D.L.: Qualitative content analysis: a guide to paths not taken. Qual. Health Res. 3, 112–121 (1993).  https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239300300107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Neven, D., Odera, M.M., Reardon, T., Wang, H.: Kenyan supermarkets, emerging middle-class horticultural farmers, and employment impacts on the rural poor. World Dev. 37, 1802–1811 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. NPC: Periodic Plans: National Planning Commission.: National Planning commission, Kathmandu (2016)Google Scholar
  52. Papola, T.S.: Poverty in Mountain Areas of the Hindu Kush Himalayas: Some Basic Issues in Measurement, Diagnosis, and Alleviation. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu (2002)Google Scholar
  53. Pingali, P., Khwaja, Y., Meijer, M.: Commercializing Small Farms: Reducing Transaction Costs. FAO, Rome (2005)Google Scholar
  54. Pokhrel, D.M.: Comparison of farm production and marketing cost and benefit among selected vegetable pockets in Nepal. J. Agric. Environ. 11, 10–25 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pokhrel, D.M., Thapa, G.B.: Are marketing intermediaries exploiting mountain farmers in Nepal? A study based on market price, marketing margin and income distribution analyses. Agric. Syst. 94, 151–164 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2006.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pradhanang, U., Pradhanang, S., Sthapit, A., Krakauer, N., Jha, A., Lakhankar, T.: National livestock policy of Nepal: needs and opportunities. Agriculture 5, 103–131 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture5010103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Staatz, J.M.: The Strategic Role of Food and Agricultural Systems in Fighting Hunger Through Fostering Sustainable Economic Growth. Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, Michigan (1994)Google Scholar
  58. Stifel, D., Minten, B.: Isolation and agricultural productivity. Agric. Econ. 39, 1–15 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00310.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Suvedi, M., Vander Stoep, G.: Improving the monitoring and evaluation of agricultural extension programs (2016)Google Scholar
  60. United Nations: Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators. UniIted Nations Economic and Social Council, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  61. von Thünen, J.H., Wartenberg, C.M., Hall, P.: Isolated State. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1966)Google Scholar
  62. Wickramasinghe, U., Weinberger, K.: Smallholder Market Participation and Production Specialization Evolution of Thinking, Issues and Policies. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, Bogor (2013)Google Scholar
  63. World Bank: Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2016: Taking on Inequality. World Bank, Washington DC (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MarketingGriffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Institute of Agriculture and the EnvironmentUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Energy and EnvironmentTERI School of Advanced StudiesNew DelhiIndia
  4. 4.Department of International StudiesUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA
  5. 5.Department of Civil and Geomatics EngineeringKathmandu UniversityDhulikhelNepal

Personalised recommendations