Advertisement

Parenthood and cars: A weakening relationship?

  • Laura McCarthyEmail author
  • Alexa Delbosc
  • Graham Currie
  • Andrew Molloy
Article
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

A wide body of research supports the notion that the travel behaviour of families with children tends to be car dependent. Yet recent literature suggests a more varied set of travel practices are emerging among this group. Using data from a large-scale household travel survey, we explored whether changes are evident in levels of car use among three household groups in Melbourne, Australia. The three groups were selected to broadly represent a sequential order of life stages: Young Couples, Young Families, and School-age Families. Chi square and two-tailed t tests were used to examine changes in travel behaviour between 2007 and 2013/2014. Negative binomial regression analysis was then conducted to examine characteristics predicting vehicle, walking and public transit trips, among the three groups. Vehicle trips decreased for all groups between 2007 and 2013/2014; the decline was greatest among households with children present, both young and school-age. This suggests that a shift towards more sustainable travel behaviour is indeed apparent among families with young and school-age children in Melbourne. However, further research is required to understand the causes of the decline and to examine evidence of the decline in other locations.

Keywords

Car-dependency Life stage analysis Family travel Children’s travel Parenthood 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Transport for Victoria, The Public Transport Research Group and the Monash University Institute of Transport Studies for their support with this work. We would also like to thank the insightful and helpful comments provided by three anonymous reviewers.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anable, J.: ‘Complacent Car Addicts’ or ‘Aspiring Environmentalists’? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory. Transp. Policy 12(1), 65–78 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, P.M., Butcher, K.F.: Childhood obesity: trends and potential causes. Future Child. 16(1), 19–45 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, F.J., Rich, S., Stockdale, R., Shelley, J.: Parents’ experiences of raising pre-school aged children in an outer-Melbourne growth corridor. Health Place 27, 220–228 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buehler, R., Pucher, J., Gerike, R., Götschi, T.: Reducing car dependence in the heart of Europe: lessons from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Transp. Rev. 37, 1–25 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. Cervero, R.: Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 7(4), 265–284 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cervero, R., Kockelman, K.: Travel demand and the 3 Ds: density, diversity and design. Transp. Res.D 2(3), 199–219 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, C., Gong, H., Paaswell, R.: Role of the built environment on mode choice decisions: additional evidence on the impact of density. Transportation 35(3), 285–299 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dargay, J.M.: The effect of income on car ownership: evidence of asymmetry. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 35(9), 807–821 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DEDJTR: VISTA 2012–2013 Technical Report: Prepared by Ipsos for the Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources. Department of Economic Development, Transport and Resources, Victoria (2015)Google Scholar
  10. DEDJTR: Victorian Integrated Survey of Travel and Activity: Weighting and Expansion Process Guide. Department of Economic Development, Transport and Resources, Victoria (2016)Google Scholar
  11. Delbosc, A.: Delay or forgo? A closer look at youth driver licensing trends in the United States and Australia. Transportation 43, 1–8 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dodson, J., Sipe, N.: Shocking the suburbs: urban location, homeownership and oil vulnerability in the Australian City. Hous. Stud. 23(3), 377–401 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dowling, R.: Parents, Children and Automobility: Trends, Challenges and Opportunities. Handbook on Transport and Development, pp. 526–538. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham (2015)Google Scholar
  14. Dowling, R., McKinnon, K.: Identities. The SAGE Handbook of Human Geography: Two Volume Set, pp. 627–648. SAGE Publications Inc., New York (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Easton, S., Ferrari, E.: Children’s travel to school-the interaction of individual, neighbourhood and school factors. Transp. Policy 44, 9–18 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Faulkner, G.E.J., Buliung, R.N., Flora, P.K., Fusco, C.: Active school transport, physical activity levels and body weight of children and youth: a systematic review. Prev. Med. 48(1), 3–8 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferguson, E.: The rise and fall of the American carpool: 1970–1990. Transportation 24(4), 349–376 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fritze, J.: You Might as Well Just Stay at Home: Young Mums and Transport in Victoria. Victorian Council of Social Services, Melbourne (2007)Google Scholar
  19. Fyhri, A., Hjorthol, R., Mackett, R.L., Fotel, T.N., Kyttä, M.: Children’s active travel and independent mobility in four countries: development, social contributing trends and measures. Transp. Policy 18(5), 703–710 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guthrie, A., Fan, Y.: Weakening obstacles to transit use changes in relationships with child rearing and automobile access from 2000 to 2010. Transp. Res. Rec. 2565, 103–110 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kitamura, R.: An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis. Transportation 15(1–2), 9–34 (1988)Google Scholar
  22. Kitamura, R.: Life-style and travel demand. Transportation 36(6), 679–710 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lanzendorf, M.: Key events and their effect on mobility biographies: the case of childbirth. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 4(5), 272–292 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lavieri, P.S., Garikapati, V.M., Bhat, C.R., Pendyala, R.M.: Investigation of heterogeneity in vehicle ownership and usage for the Millennial generation. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2664, 91–99 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lubans, D.R., Boreham, C.A., Kelly, P., Foster, C.E.: The relationship between active travel to school and health-related fitness in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 8, 5 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mackett, R.: The health implications of inequalities in travel. J. Transp. Health 1(3), 202–209 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mackett, R.L.: Increasing car dependency of children: Should we be worried? Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. Munic. Eng. 151(1), 29–38 (2002)Google Scholar
  28. McCarthy, L., Delbosc, A., Currie, G., Molloy, A.: Factors influencing travel mode choice among families with young children (aged 0–4): a review of the literature. Transp. Rev. 14, 1–15 (2017)Google Scholar
  29. McDonald, N.C.: Exploratory analysis of children’s travel patterns. Transp. Res. Rec. 1977, 1–7 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McDonald, N.C.: Children’s mode choice for the school trip: the role of distance and school location in walking to school. Transportation 35(1), 23–35 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McDonald, N.C.: Are Millennials Really the “Go-Nowhere” Generation? J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 81(2), 90–103 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McFadden, D.: Quantitative Methods for Analyzing Travel Behaviour of Individuals: Some Recent Developments, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics. Yale University, New Haven (1977)Google Scholar
  33. McLaren, A.T.: Families and transportation: moving towards multimodality and altermobility? J. Transp. Geogr. 51, 218–225 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mondschein, A., Taylor, B.D.: Is traffic congestion overrated? Examining the highly variable effects of congestion on travel and accessibility. J. Transp. Geogr. 64, 65–76 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Müggenburg, H., Busch-Geertsema, A., Lanzendorf, M.: Mobility biographies: a review of achievements and challenges of the mobility biographies approach and a framework for further research. J. Transp. Geogr. 46, 151–163 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nolan, A.: A dynamic analysis of household car ownership. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 44(6), 446–455 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oakil, A.T.M., Ettema, D., Arentze, T., Timmermans, H.: Changing household car ownership level and life cycle events: an action in anticipation or an action on occurrence. Transportation 41(4), 889–904 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Panter, J., Corder, K., Griffin, S.J., Jones, A.P., van Sluijs, E.M.F.: Individual, socio-cultural and environmental predictors of uptake and maintenance of active commuting in children: longitudinal results from the SPEEDY study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Activity 10, 1128 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pont, K., Ziviani, J., Wadley, D., Bennett, S., Abbott, R.: Environmental correlates of children’s active transportation: a systematic literature review. Health Place 15(3), 849–862 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rau, H., Sattlegger, L.: Shared journeys, linked lives: a relational-biographical approach to mobility practices. Mobilities 1, 1–19 (2017)Google Scholar
  41. Ryley, T.: Use of non-motorised modes and life stage in Edinburgh. J. Transp. Geogr. 14(5), 367–375 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scheiner, J.: Gendered key events in the life course: effects on changes in travel mode choice over time. J. Transp. Geogr. 37, 47–60 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scheiner, J., Holz-Rau, C.: Travel mode choice: Affected by objective or subjective determinants? Transportation 34(4), 487–511 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schoeppe, S., Duncan, M.J., Badland, H., Oliver, M., Curtis, C.: Associations of children’s independent mobility and active travel with physical activity, sedentary behaviour and weight status: a systematic review. J. Sci. Med. Sp. 16(4), 312–319 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schwanen, T.: Car use and gender: the case of dual-earner families in Utrecht, The Netherlands. In: Lucas, K., Blumenberg, E., Weinberger, R. (eds.) Auto Motives: Understanding Car Use Behaviours, pp. 39–62. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Bingley (2011)Google Scholar
  46. Sheller, M.: Automotive emotions: feeling the car. Theory Culture Soc. 21(4–5), 221–242 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thomas, A.: A More Sustainable Minivan? An Exploratory Study of Electric Bicycle Use by San Francisco Bay Area Families. A Research Report from the National Center for Sustainable Transportation, California (2016)Google Scholar
  48. Van Acker, V., Witlox, F.: Car ownership as a mediating variable in car travel behaviour research using a structural equation modelling approach to identify its dual relationship. J. Transp. Geogr. 18(1), 65–74 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zimmerman, C.A.: The life cycle concept as a tool for travel research. Transportation 11(1), 51–69 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zwerts, E., Janssens, D., Wets, G.: How the presence of children affects parents’ travel behavior. In: 4th International conference of traffic and transport psychology. Washington DC (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Transport StudiesMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and ResourcesMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations