Transportation

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 597–622 | Cite as

Reducing traffic externalities by multiple-cordon pricing

Article
  • 118 Downloads

Abstract

The second-best congestion pricing schemes including common optimum, one cordon, and multiple cordons schemes are compared with the first-best optimum pricing scheme. A cross-subsidy effect exists in these second-best pricing models. However, the scheme with more cordons will diminish the cross-subsidy and approach an efficient and equitable outcome. The relative efficiency of a cordon pricing scheme for the case of Taipei metropolis is very high. One single cordon yields excellent performance of 93% relative efficiency. There might be some factors causing the good results: the uncongested traffic condition, the linear unit distance cost in traffic flow forming a nonlinear cost function, and the trip demands with continuous space and the same destination (the central business district) in the network.

Keywords

Multiple-cordon pricing Second-best congestion pricing Traffic congestion externality Social surplus 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Editor and the anonymous referees for very helpful comments in the paper revision.

References

  1. Akiyama, T., Mun, Se-il, Okushima, M.: Second-best congestion pricing in urban space: cordon pricing and its alternatives. Rev. Netw. Econ. 3, 401–414 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, D., Mohring, H.: Congestion costs and congestion pricing. In: Green, D.L., Jones, D.L. (eds.) The Full Costs and Benefits of Transportation: Contributions to Theory, Method and Measurement, pp. 315–336. Springer, Berlin (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chu, C.-P., Tsai, J.-F.: The optimal location and road pricing for an elevated road in a corridor. Transp. Res. Part A 42, 842–856 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. De Borger, B., Proost, S.: Reforming Transport Pricing in European Union: A Modelling Approach. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Lara, M., de Palma, A., Kilani, M., Piperno, S.: Congestion pricing and long term urban form: application to Paris region. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 43, 282–295 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Palma, A., Kilani, M., De Lara, M., Piperno, S.: Cordon pricing in the monocentric city model: theory and application to Ile-de- France. Recherches Economiques de Louvain - Louvain economic review, De Boeck Université 77(2–3), 105–124 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Department of Budget, Accounting, and Statistics, Taipei City Government: Commuting Pattern Analysis for Residents Greater than 15 Years Old in Greater Taipei Area (2010) (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  8. Dewees, D.N.: Estimating the time costs of highway congestion. Econometrica 47, 1499–1512 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Directorate General of Highway, Taiwan: http://www.thb.gov.tw/TM/Webpage.aspx?entry=70 (2012) (in Chinese)
  10. Eliasson, J., Matsson, L.-G.: Equity effects of congestion pricing: quantitative methodology and a case study for Stockholm. Transp. Res. Part A 40, 602–620 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. Fujita, M.: Urban Economic Theory: Land Use and City Size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gomez-Ibanez, J.A., Fauth, G.R.: Downtown auto restraint policies: the costs and benefits for Boston. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 14, 133–153 (1980)Google Scholar
  13. Ho, H.W., Wong, S.C., Yang, H., Loo, B.P.Y.: Cordon-based congestion pricing in a continuum traffic equilibrium system. Transp. Res. Part A 39, 814–834 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. Keeler, T.E., Small, K.A.: Optimal peak-load pricing, investment and service levels on urban expressways. J. Polit. Econ. 85(1), 1–25 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Knight, F.H.: Some fallacies in the interpretation of social cost. Quart. J. Econ. 38, 582–606 (1924)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, M.Z.F.: The role of speed-flow relationship in congestion pricing implementation with an application to Singapore. Transp. Res. B 36, 731–754 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maruyama, T., Sumalee, A.: Efficiency and equity comparison of cordon- and area-based road pricing schemes using trip-chain equilibrium model. Transp. Res. Part A 41, 655–671 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. May, A.D., Milne, D.S.: Effects of alternative road pricing systems on network performance. Transp. Res. Part A 34, 407–436 (2000)Google Scholar
  19. Mohring, H., Harwitz, M.: Highway Benefits: An Analytical Framework. Northwestern University Press, Evanston (1962)Google Scholar
  20. Mun, S., Konishi, K., Yoshikawa, K.: Optimal cordon pricing. J. Urban Econ. 54, 21–38 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mun, S., Konishi, K., Yoshikawa, K.: Optimal cordon pricing in a non-monocentric city. Transp. Res. Part A 39, 723–736 (2005)Google Scholar
  22. Nguyen, K.P.: Demand, supply, and pricing in urban road transport: the case of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Res. Transp. Econ. 5, 107–154 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Niskanen, E., Nash, C.: Implementation of Marginal Cost Pricing in Transport—Integrated Conceptual and Applied Model Analysis: Final Report, Leeds, UK: Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds. http://www.strafica.fi/mcicam/reports.html (2004)
  24. Pigou, A.C.: Wealth and Welfare. Macmillan, London (1920)Google Scholar
  25. Rietveld, P., Verhoef, E.T.: Social feasibility of policies to reduce externalities in transport. In: Button, K.J., Verhoef, E.T. (eds.) Road Pricing, Traffic Congestion and the Environment—Issues of Efficiency and Social Feasibility. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham (1998)Google Scholar
  26. Santos, G. (ed.): Road Pricing: Theory and Evidence, Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 9. Elsevier JAI, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  27. Strotz, R.: Urban transportation parables. In: Margolis, J. (ed.) The Public Economy of Urban Communities. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore (1965)Google Scholar
  28. Sumalee, A.: Optimal road user charging cordon design: a heuristic optimisation approach. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 19, 377–392 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sumalee, A.: Multi-concentric optimal charging cordon design. Transportmetrica 3, 41–71 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sumalee, A., Shepherd, S., May, A.: Road user charging design: dealing with multi-objectives and constraints. Transportation 36, 167–186 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taipei City Traffic Engineering Office, 2012, http://www.bote.taipei.gov.tw/ (in Chinese)
  32. Tikoudis, I., Verhoef, E.T., Van Ommeren, J.N.: On revenue recycling and the welfare effects of second-best congestion pricing in a monocentric city. J. Urban Econ. 89, 32–74 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsai, J.-F., Chu, C.-P.: Analysis of the optimal length of road expansion—a case study of the Taipei metropolitan area. Transp. Res. Part A 44, 147–158 (2010)Google Scholar
  34. Verhoef, E.T.: Second-best congestion pricing in general networks. Heuristic algorithms for finding second-best optimal toll levels and toll points. Transp. Res. Part B 36, 707–729 (2002a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Verhoef, E.T.: Second-best congestion pricing in general static transportation networks with elastic demands. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 32, 281–310 (2002b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Verhoef, E.T.: Second-best congestion pricing schemes in the monocentric city. J. Urban Econ. 58, 367–388 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Verhoef, E.T.: Road transport pricing: motivation, objectives and design from an economic perspective. In: Verhoef, E., Bliemer, M., Steg, L., van Wee, B. (eds.) Pricing in Road—A Multi-disciplinary Perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham (2008)Google Scholar
  38. Vickrey, W.S.: Pricing in urban and suburban transport. Am. Econ. Rev. 53(2), 452–465 (1963)Google Scholar
  39. Walters, A.A.: The theory and measurement of private and social cost of highway congestion. Econometrica 29(4), 676–699 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang, X., Yang, H.: The optimal cordon-based network congestion pricing problem. Transp. Res. Part B 38, 517–537 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Institute of Urban PlanningNational Taipei UniversityNew Taipei CityTaiwan
  2. 2.CCIS Real Estate Joint Appraisers FirmTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations