Advertisement

An Integrated Multitheoretical Perspective of Public Healthcare Services Delivery Organizations

  • Sunil K. DixitEmail author
  • Murali Sambasivan
Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

This study seeks to create an integrated multitheoretical model of public healthcare services delivery organizations. A literature review of selected organization theories and their relevance to healthcare was conducted. By illuminating the aspects of control over resources, isomorphism, adaptation to the changing environment and contracts between parties based on the key elements of the resource-dependence theory, institutional theory, population ecology and transaction-cost economics theory, an integrated multitheoretical model of a public healthcare services delivery organization has been presented. There is a need for empirically testing the model proposed by this study.

Keywords

Organization Healthcare organization Multitheoretical organization Resource-dependence theory Institutional theory Population ecology Transaction-cost theory 

Notes

References

  1. Abbott, K. W., Green, J. F., & Keohane, R. O. (2016). Organizational ecology and institutional change in global governance. International Organization, 70(2), 247–277.Google Scholar
  2. Aldrich, H., & Ruef, M. (2006). Organizations evolving (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, J. A., & D’Aunno, T. A. (2003). Alternative perspectives on institutional and market relationships in the US health care sector. In S. S. Mick & M. E. Wyttenbach (Eds.), Advances in health care organization theory (pp. 45–77). San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Alexander, J. A., & Morrisey, M. A. (1989). A resource-dependence model of hospital contract management. Health Services Research, 24(2), 259–284.Google Scholar
  5. Angst, C. M., Block, E. S., D'arcy, J., & Kelley, K. (2017). When do IT security investments matter? Accounting for the influence of institutional factors in the context of healthcare data breaches. MIS Quarterly, 41(3), 893–916.Google Scholar
  6. Arndt, M., & Bigelow, B. (2006). Toward the creation of an institutional logic for the management of hospitals: efficiency in the early nineteen hundreds. Medical Care Research and Review, 63(3), 369–394.Google Scholar
  7. Arthur, R., Nicholson, A., Sibani, P., & Christensen, M. (2017). The tangled nature model for organizational ecology. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 23(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
  8. Banaszak-Holl, J., Zinn, J. S., & Mor, V. (1996). The impact of market and organizational characteristics on nursing care facility service innovation: a resource dependency perspective. Health Services Research, 31(1), 97–117.Google Scholar
  9. Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231–1241.Google Scholar
  10. Bloom, J. R. (2010). The contribution of organizational theory to Health Care. In C. B. Schoonhoven & F. Dobbin (Eds.), Stanford’s organization theory renaissance, 1970–2000 (pp. 319–327). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  11. Bloom, J. R., Alexander, J. A., & Nuchols, B. A. (1997). Nurse staffing patterns and hospital efficiency in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 44(2), 147–155.Google Scholar
  12. Bolon, D. S. (1998). Bureaucracy, institutional theory and institutionaucracy: applications to the hospital industry. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 21(1), 70–79.Google Scholar
  13. Burnett, S., Mendel, P., Nunes, F., Wiig, S., van den Bovenkamp, H., Karltun, A., Robert, G., Anderson, J., Vincent, C., & Fulop, N. (2016). Using institutional theory to analyse hospital responses to external demands for finance and quality in five European countries. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 21(2), 109–117.Google Scholar
  14. Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 167–199.Google Scholar
  15. CMS (2015). Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model. https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/cjr. Accessed 20 Dec 2015.
  16. Cook, K., Shortell, S. M., Conrad, D. A., & Morrisey, M. A. (1983). A theory of organizational response to regulation: the case of hospitals. Academy of Management Review, 8(2), 193–205.Google Scholar
  17. Cronin, C. E. (2015). Hospitals' Choices and the Institutional Environment: the Role of Community Benefit in the Health Care Sector. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University.Google Scholar
  18. D’Aunno, T. A., & Zuckerman, H. S. (1987). Hospital federations: an integration of perspectives from organizational theory. Medical Care Review, 44(2), 323–343.Google Scholar
  19. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.Google Scholar
  20. Dixit, S. K. (2016). Strategic management in hospitals – Theory and practice: orthopedic and spine services. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 9(3), 181–189.Google Scholar
  21. Donaldson, L. (1995). American anti-management theories of organization : a critique of paradigm proliferation (Cambridge studies in management). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Eicher, B. (2018). Transaction cost economics and trust in the hospital sector: An empirical examination using the example of Germany. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 11(4), 341–350.Google Scholar
  24. Fareed, N., & Mick, S. S. (2011). To make or buy patient safety solutions: A resource dependence and transaction cost economics perspective. Health Care Management Review, 36(4), 288–298.Google Scholar
  25. Gerald, F. D., & Cobb, J. A. (2010). Resource dependence theory: Past and future. In C. B. Schoonhoven, & F. Dobbin (Eds.), Stanford's Organization Theory Renaissance, 1970–2000 (Vol. 28, pp. 21–42, Research in the Sociology of Organizations). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  26. Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: a critique of the transaction cost theory. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13–47.Google Scholar
  27. Green, L., Fryer, G., Jr., Yawn, B., Lanier, D., & Dovey, S. (2001). Ecology of medical care. The New England Journal of Medicine, 344(2021), 5.Google Scholar
  28. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hansen, A. H. (2013). A population-based study of health care utilisation according to care level, socio-economic group, and continuity of primary care. The Tromsø Study. Tromsø: University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
  30. Hatch, M. J. (1997). Organisation theory: modern symbolic and postmodern perspecticves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: a review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.Google Scholar
  32. House, R. J. (1991). The distribution and exercise of power in complex organizations: a MESO theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 2(1), 23–58.Google Scholar
  33. Hu, Y. (2017). Strategy and ecology: a synthesis and research agenda. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(3), 456–467.Google Scholar
  34. Kazley, A. S., & Ozcan, Y. A. (2007). Organizational and environmental determinants of hospital EMR adoption: a National Study. Journal of Medical Systems, 31(5), 375–384.Google Scholar
  35. Laffont, J.-J., & Martimort, D. (1998). Transaction costs, institutional design and the separation of powers. European Economic Review, 42(3), 673–684.Google Scholar
  36. Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58.Google Scholar
  37. Leeman, J., & Mark, B. (2006). The chronic care model versus disease management programs: a transaction cost analysis approach. Health Care Management Review, 31(1), 18–25.Google Scholar
  38. Mayer, K. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2013). Integrating theories in AMJ articles. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 917–922.Google Scholar
  39. McKinley, W., & Mone, M. A. (2003). Micro and macro perspectives in organization theory: A tale of incommensurability. In C. Knudsen & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), The oxford handbook of organization theory (pp. 345–372). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. McKinley, W., & Scherer, A. G. (2000). Some unanticipated consequences of organizational restructuring. The Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 735–752.Google Scholar
  41. Meyer, R. E., & Höllerer, M. A. (2014). Does institutional theory need redirecting? Journal of Management Studies, 51(7), 1221–1233.Google Scholar
  42. Mick, S. S., & Shay, P. D. (2014a). Introduction: events, themes, and Progress. In S. S. Mick & P. D. Shay (Eds.), Advances in health care organization theory (2nd ed., pp. 1–24). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  43. Mick, S. S., & Shay, P. D. (2014b). A primer of organization theories in health care. In Advances in health care organization theory (2nd ed., pp. 25–52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  44. Miles, J. A. (2012). Management and organization theory: a Jossey-Bass reader. Hoboken: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Miner, J. B. (2006). Organizational behavior 2: essential theories of process and structure. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  46. Perrow, C. (1981). Perspectives on organization design and behavior. In A. H. Van de Ven & W. F. Joyce (Eds.), Wiley series on organizational assessment and change. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Pfeffer, J. (1972a). Interorganizational influence and managerial attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 15(3), 317–330.Google Scholar
  48. Pfeffer, J. (1972b). Merger as a response to organizational interdependence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 382–394.Google Scholar
  49. Pfeffer, J. (1972c). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: the organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 218–228.Google Scholar
  50. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: a resource dependence approach. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.Google Scholar
  51. Rao, P. K. (2002). The economics of transaction costs: theory, methods and applications. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  52. Rao, P. K. (2003). Development finance. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin.Google Scholar
  53. Royston, G., Hinings, C. R., & Dave, W. (2014). Rethinking institutions and organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 51(7), 1206.Google Scholar
  54. Sambasivan, M., Deepak, T., Salim, A. N., & Ponniah, V. (2017). Analysis of delays in Tanzanian construction industry: Transaction cost economics (TCE) and structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 24(2), 308–325.Google Scholar
  55. Sanders, T. J. (2010). Propositions for investigating adoption and diffusion of the magnet hospital concept through the lenses of organization theory. Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 4(March 2010), 1–19.Google Scholar
  56. Shay, P. D., & Mick, S. S. (2013). Post-acute care and vertical integration after the patient protection and affordable care act. Journal of Healthcare Management, 58(1), 15–27.Google Scholar
  57. Shepherd, D. A., & Suddaby, R. (2017). Theory building: a review and integration. Journal of Management, 43(1), 59–86.Google Scholar
  58. Shortell, S. M., & Kaluzny, A. D. (1994). Health care management: Organization, design, and behavior (Delmar series in health services administration) (3rd ed.). Albany: Delmar Publishers.Google Scholar
  59. Stewart, M., & Ryan, B. (2015). Ecology of health care in Canada. Canadian Family Physician, 61(5), 449–453.Google Scholar
  60. Stiles, R. A., Mick, S. S., & Wise, C. G. (2001). The logic of transaction cost economics in health care organization theory. Health Care Management Review, 26(2), 85–92.Google Scholar
  61. Ulrich, D., & Barney, J. B. (1984). Perspectives in organizations: resource dependence, efficiency, and population. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 471–481.Google Scholar
  62. Weech-Maldonado, R., Zinn, J. E., & Hamilton, R. D., 3rd. (2001). The performance impact of context in TQM implementation: the nursing facility industry. Health Services Management Research, 14(3), 147–158.Google Scholar
  63. White, K. R. (2000). Hospitals sponsored by the Roman Catholic Church: separate, equal, and distinct? The Milbank Quarterly, 78(2), 213–239.Google Scholar
  64. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  65. Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577.Google Scholar
  66. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  67. Williamson, O. E. (1998). Transaction cost economics: how it works; where it is headed. De Economist, 146(1), 23–58.Google Scholar
  68. Yang, C. (2015). Implementing hospital innovation in Taiwan: the perspectives of institutional theory and social capital. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 30(4), 403–425.Google Scholar
  69. Young, R. C. (1988). Is population ecology a useful paradigm for the study of organizations? American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  70. Zinn, J., & Branson, S. D. (2014). Finding strength in numbers: bringing theoretical pluralism into the analysis of health care organizations. In S. S. Mick & P. D. Shay (Eds.), Advances in health care organization theory (2nd ed., pp. 53–78). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Health Policy and Management ProgramMount Saint Mary’s UniversityLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.The Victoria Institute of Strategic Economic Studies (VISES)Victoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Taylor’s University Lakeside CampusSubang JayaMalaysia

Personalised recommendations