Advertisement

Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis of the Researcher’s Competence in the Formation of University-Industry Collaboration Using Smart PLS

  • Sew Huey TingEmail author
  • Sofri Yahya
  • Cheng Ling Tan
Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

This study empirically identified and investigated the importance and performance of researcher’s competence which serves as crucial stimuli in initiating university-industry collaborative activities in Malaysian research universities using Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis (IPMA). The findings are endorsed by the IPMA that the importance and performance of domain knowledge are high in contributing to sustainability entrepreneurship thus lead to the university-industry collaboration formation. It is also found that social capital and market knowledge are important but the performance of these areas required attention from the management to further enhance. Unexpectedly, it is suggested that the management should pay less attention to researcher reputation as this is the least priority area for improvement as demonstrated by the results generated by the IPMA. Essentially, the findings contribute to the benefit of the university leaders to understand the diversity of competence possessed by the academic researchers as valuable resources in spotting and seizing a business opportunity.

Keywords

University-industry collaboration Market knowledge Self-leadership Social capital Reputation Domain knowledge 

Notes

References

  1. Åkerman, N. (2015). Knowledge-acquisition strategies and the effects on market knowledge – Profiling the internationalizing firm. European Management Journal, 33(2), 79–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.06.003.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, P. A. (1992). Domain knowledge: Evolving themes and emerging concerns. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 33–51.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 375–404.Google Scholar
  4. Ali-Hassan, H., Nevo, D., & Wade, M. (2015). Linking dimensions of social media use to job performance: The role of social capital. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(2), 65–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2015.03.001.Google Scholar
  5. Al-tabbaa, O., & Ankrah, S. (2016). Social capital to facilitate ‘ engineered ’ university – Industry collaboration for technology transfer : A dynamic perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.027.Google Scholar
  6. Alwin, D. F. (1997). Feeling thermometers versus 7-point scales. Which are better? Sociological Methods and Research, 25(3), 318–340.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124197025003003.Google Scholar
  7. Ankrah, S., & Omar, A. T. (2015). Universities-industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387–408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003.Google Scholar
  8. Atuahene-Gima, K., & Wei, Y. (2011). The vital role of problem-solving competence in new product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(1), 81–98.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00782.x.Google Scholar
  9. Banal-Estañol, A., Jofre-Bonet, M., & Lawson, C. (2015). The double-edged sword of industry collaboration: Evidence from engineering academics in the UK. Research Policy, 44(6), 1160–1175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.02.006.Google Scholar
  10. Becker, J. M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 359–394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001.Google Scholar
  11. Belz, F. M., & Binder, J. K. (2015). Sustainable entrepreneurship: A convergent process model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(1), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1887.Google Scholar
  12. Bentley, P. J., Gulbrandsen, M., & Kyvik, S. (2015). The relationship between basic and applied research in universities. Higher Education, 70(4), 689–709.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9861-2.Google Scholar
  13. Boardman, P. C. (2009). Government centrality to university-industry interactions: University research centers and the industry involvement of academic researchers. Research Policy, 38(10), 1505–1516.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.008.Google Scholar
  14. Boardman, P. C., & Ponomariov, B. L. (2009). University researchers working with private companies. Technovation, 29(2), 142–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.03.008.Google Scholar
  15. Bochare, A., Gangopadhyay, A., Yesha, Y., Joshi, A., Yesha, Y., Brady, M., Grasso, M. A., & Rishe, N. (2014). Integrating domain knowledge in supervised machine learning to assess the risk of breast cancer. International Journal of Medical Engineering and Informatics, 6(2), 87–99.Google Scholar
  16. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2008). University patenting and scientific productivity: A quantitative study of Italian academic inventors. European Management Review, 5(2), 91–109.  https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2008.9.Google Scholar
  17. Bstieler, L., Hemmert, M., & Barczak, G. (2015). Trust Formation in University–Industry Collaborations in the U.S. Biotechnology Industry: IP Policies, Shared Governance, and Champions* ,†, 32(1), 111–121.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12242.
  18. Chandran, V. G. R., Sundram, V. P. K., & Santhidran, S. (2014). Innovation systems in Malaysia: A perspective of university-industry R&D collaboration. AI and Society, 29(3), 435–444.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0468-9.Google Scholar
  19. Chollet, B., Géraudel, M., Khedhaouria, A., & Mothe, C. (2016). Market knowledge as a function of CEOs’ personality: A fuzzy set approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2567–2573.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.137.Google Scholar
  20. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences Lawrence Earlbaum associates. Hillsdale, NJ, 20–26.Google Scholar
  21. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.Google Scholar
  22. D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295–1313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002.Google Scholar
  23. D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316–339.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z.Google Scholar
  24. D’Este, P., Guy, F., & Iammarino, S. (2013). Shaping the formation of university-industry research collaborations: What type of proximity does really matter? Journal of Economic Geography, 13(4), 537–558.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs010.Google Scholar
  25. Dafoe, A., Renshon, J., & Huth, P. (2014). Reputation and status as motives for war. Annual Review of Political Science, 17(1), 371–393.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-071112-213421.Google Scholar
  26. Dai, W. D., Mao, Z. E., Zhao, X. R., & Mattila, A. S. (2015). How does social capital influence the hospitality firm’s financial performance? The moderating role of entrepreneurial activities. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 51, 42–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.08.011.Google Scholar
  27. Denancé, V., & Somat, A. (2015). Learning by explaining: Impacts of explanations on the development of a competence. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 65(6), 307–315.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2015.10.005.Google Scholar
  28. Dornbusch, F., & Neuhäusler, P. (2015). Composition of inventor teams and technological progress – The role of collaboration between academia and industry. Research Policy, 44(7), 1360–1375.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.003.Google Scholar
  29. Eilström, P. E., & Kock, H. (2008). Competence development in the workplace: Concepts, strategies and effects. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(1), 5–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03025821.Google Scholar
  30. Ertug, G., & Castellucci, F. (2014). Who shall get more? How intangible assets and aspiration levels affect the valuation of resource providers. Strategic Organization, 13(1), 6–31.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014561019.Google Scholar
  31. Ertug, G., Yogev, T., Lee, Y. G., & Hedström, P. (2016). The art of representation: How audience-specific reputations affect success in the contemporary art field. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), 113–134.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0621.Google Scholar
  32. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4.Google Scholar
  33. Fisher, R. (2013). “A gentleman’s handshake”: The role of social capital and trust in transforming information into usable knowledge. Journal of Rural Studies, 31, 13–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.02.006.Google Scholar
  34. Ford, J. B., Honeycutt, D. & Simintiras, A. C. (2003). Sales management: A global perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Franco, M., & Haase, H. (2015). University – Industry cooperation : Researchers ’ motivations and interaction channels. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 36, 41–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.05.002.Google Scholar
  36. Giuliani, E., Morrison, A., Pietrobelli, C., & Rabellotti, R. (2010). Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy. Research Policy, 39(6), 748–761.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.007.Google Scholar
  37. Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327–347.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634438.Google Scholar
  38. Guimón, J. (2013). Promoting University-Industry Collaboration in Developing Countries. World Bank, 3.Google Scholar
  39. Hadar, I., Soffer, P., & Kenzi, K. (2014). The role of domain knowledge in requirements elicitation via interviews: An exploratory study. Requirements Engineering, 19(2), 143–159.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-012-0163-2.Google Scholar
  40. Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications., 26(2), 106–121.  https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128.Google Scholar
  41. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.  https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.Google Scholar
  42. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (1st ed.). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  43. Hauschildt, K., & Konradt, U. (2012). The effect of self-leadership on work role performance in teams. Leadership, 8(2), 145–168.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715011429588.Google Scholar
  44. Harman, H. H. (1960). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  45. Haynes, A. S., Derrick, G. E., Redman, S., Hall, W. D., Gillespie, J. A., Chapman, S., & Sturk, H. (2012). Identifying trustworthy experts: How do policymakers find and assess public health researchers worth consulting or collaborating with? PLoS One, 7(3).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032665.
  46. He, J., van Ossenbruggen, J., & de Vries, A. P. (2013). Fish4label : Accomplishing an Expert Task without Expert Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Open Research Areas in Information Retrieval, (pp. 211–212). LE CENTRE DE HAUTES ETUDES INTERNAT.Google Scholar
  47. Hock, C., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2010). Management of Multi-Purpose Stadiums: Importance and performance measurement of service interfaces. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 14(2/3), 188–207.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTM.2010.034327.Google Scholar
  48. Hofer, F. (2011). Knowledge transfer between academia and industry. In In Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management, Second Edition, pp. 977–986. IGI Global, 2011.Google Scholar
  49. Houghton, J. D., Dawley, D., & DiLiello, T. C. (2012). The abbreviated self-leadership questionnaire (ASLQ): A more concise measure of self-leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(2), 216–232.Google Scholar
  50. Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005). Social capital, networks and knowledge transfer. The Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146–165.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20159100.Google Scholar
  51. Ivascu, L., Cirjaliu, B., & Draghici, A. (2016). Business model for the university-industry collaboration in open innovation. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39(November 2015), 674–678.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30288-X.Google Scholar
  52. Javadi, M. H. M., Rezaee, M. S., & Salehzadeh, R. (2013). Investigating the relationship between self-leadership strategies and job satisfaction. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 3(3), 284–289.  https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v3-i3/178.Google Scholar
  53. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (2014). Blue Ocean strategy, expanded edition: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Harvard business review Press.Google Scholar
  54. Kohli, A. K., Jaworski, B. J., & Kumar, A. (1993). MARKOR: a measure of market orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(4), 467–477.Google Scholar
  55. Kumar, R., & Sharan, A. (2014). Personalized web search using browsing history and domain knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on issues and challenges in intelligent computing techniques, ICICT 2014 (pp. 493–497).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICICT.2014.6781332.Google Scholar
  56. Lakhmani, S., Oppold, P., Rupp, M. A., Szalma, J. L., & Hancock, P. A. (2015). Heterogeneous knowledge distribution in MMO player behavior: Using domain knowledge to distinguish membership in a community of practice. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 455–467.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.032.Google Scholar
  57. Landry, R., Amara, N., & Lamari, M. (2002a). Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69(7), 681–701.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00170-6.Google Scholar
  58. Landry, R., Amara, N., & Ouimet, M. (2002b). Research transfer in natural sciences and engineering: Evidence from Canadian universities. In In 4th Triple Helix Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark. Retrieved from internal-pdf:/Landry Amara Ouimet 2002.pdf.Google Scholar
  59. Lans, T., Blok, V., & Wesselink, R. (2014). Learning apart and together : Towards an integrated competence framework for sustainable entrepreneurship in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 62, 37–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.036.Google Scholar
  60. Latif, N. S. A., Abdullah, A., Jan, N. M., & Thaheer, A. S. M. (2016). Market Orientation Conception on Commercialization of University Research Products with Moderating Effect of Organizational Culture. In Proceedings of the 1st AAGBS International Conference on Business Management 2014, AiCoBM(2014), 17–27 Springer Singapore.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-426-9.
  61. Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), 111–133.Google Scholar
  62. Levy, N. (2014). Domain knowledge, ability, and the principal’s authority relations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 45(2), 370–394.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12055.Google Scholar
  63. Leyden, D. P., & Link, A. N. (2013). Knowledge spillovers, collective entrepreneurship, and economic growth: The role of universities. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 797–817.Google Scholar
  64. Lievens, F., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2015). Situational judgment tests: From measures of situational judgment to measures of general domain knowledge. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1–20.Google Scholar
  65. Lindberg, O., & Rantatalo, O. (2014). Competence in professional practice: A practice theory analysis of police and doctors. Human Relations, 0018726714532666.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714532666.
  66. Lisboa, A., Skarmeas, D., & Lages, C. (2013). Export market exploitation and exploration and performance. International Marketing Review, 30(3), 211–230.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331311321972.Google Scholar
  67. Liu, Y., Li, Y., & Xue, J. (2010). Transfer of market knowledge in a channel relationship: Impacts of attitudinal commitment and satisfaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(2), 229–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.12.017.Google Scholar
  68. Loew, L. (2016). Competency management: challenges and benefits. Retrieved from https://trainingmag.com/competency-management-challenges-and-benefits/.
  69. Macinko, J., & Starfield, B. (2001). The utility of social capital in research on health determinants. The Milbank Quarterly, 79(3), 387–427, IV.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.00213.Google Scholar
  70. Małachowski, B., & Korytkowski, P. (2016). Competence-based performance model of multi-skilled workers. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 91, 165–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.11.018.Google Scholar
  71. Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 585–600.Google Scholar
  72. Manz, C. C. (2015). Taking the self-leadership high road: Smooth surface or potholes ahead? Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 132–151.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0060.Google Scholar
  73. Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. The Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79.Google Scholar
  74. Møllegaard, S., & Meier, M. (2015). The effect of grandparents’ economic, cultural, and social capital on grandchildren’s educational success. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 42, 11–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2015.06.004.Google Scholar
  75. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.Google Scholar
  76. Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(1), 2–10.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500001.Google Scholar
  77. Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2005). The theory of the knowledge-creating firm: Subjectivity, objectivity and synthesis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(3), 419–436.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth058.Google Scholar
  78. Ozkaya, H. E., Droge, C., Hult, G. T. M., Calantone, R., & Ozkaya, E. (2015). Market orientation, knowledge competence, and innovation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(3), 309–318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.10.004.Google Scholar
  79. Packalen, K. A. (2007). Complementing capital: The role of status, demographic features, and social capital in founding teams’ abilities to obtain resources. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 873–891.  https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12164.Google Scholar
  80. Palich, L. E., & Ray Bagby, D. (1995). Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(6), 425–438.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(95)00082-J.Google Scholar
  81. Park, G. R., Moon, G. W., & Yang, D. H. (2015). The moderation effect of smart phone addiction in relationship between self-leadership and innovative behavior. J Multidiscipl Eng Sci Technol (JMEST), 2(4), 784.Google Scholar
  82. Pinheiro, R., & Stensaker, B. (2014). Designing the Entrepreneurial University: The interpretation of a global idea. Public Organization Review, 14(4), 497–516.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0241-z.Google Scholar
  83. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.Google Scholar
  84. Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1993). Social capital and institutional success. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy, 163, 185.Google Scholar
  85. Ramli, N., Zainol, Z. A., Aziz, J. A., Ali, H. M., Hassim, J., Hussein, W. H. W. M., et al. (2013). The concept of Research University : The implementation in the context of Malaysian University system. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 307–317.  https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p307.Google Scholar
  86. Rattray, J., & Jones, M. C. (2007). Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(2), 234–243.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x.Google Scholar
  87. Raudla, R., Karo, E., Valdmaa, K., & Kattel, R. (2015). Implications of project-based funding of research on budgeting and financial management in public universities. Higher Education, 70(6), 957–971.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9875-9.Google Scholar
  88. Renault, C. S. (2006). Academic capitalism and university incentives for faculty entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2), 227–239.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-6108-x.Google Scholar
  89. Şahin, F. (2011). The interaction of self-leadership and psychological climate on job performance. Journal of Business, 5(5), 1787–1794.  https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM10.763.Google Scholar
  90. Salleh, M. S., & Omar, M. Z. (2013). University-industry collaboration models in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102(Ifee 2012), 654–664.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.784.Google Scholar
  91. Serageldin, I., & Grootaert, C. (1998). 10. Defining social capital: an integrating view. Evaluation and Development: the institutional dimension, 1, 203.Google Scholar
  92. Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222–237.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.682.Google Scholar
  93. Schulz, M. (2001). The uncertain relevance of newness: Organizational learning and knowledge flows. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 661–681.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3069409.Google Scholar
  94. SCOMM (2013). The APEX University: The state of the art. Universiti Sains Malaysia: Strategic Communications Office.Google Scholar
  95. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: Improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 111–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(03)00007-5.Google Scholar
  96. Sorenson, O. (2013). Status and reputation: Synonyms or separate concepts? Strategic Organization, 12(1), 62–69.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013513219.Google Scholar
  97. Stan, C. (2014). Concept of Competence - Clarification and Meanings. STAN, C. . CONCEPT OF COMPETENCE - CLARIFICATION AND MEANINGS. Managerial Challenges Of The Contemporary Society, 7(2), 132.Google Scholar
  98. Tartari, V., & Breschi, S. (2012). Set them free: Scientists’ evaluations of the benefits and costs of university-industry research collaboration. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(5), 1117–1147.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dts004.Google Scholar
  99. Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive Sampling as a Tool for Informant Selection, 158, 147–158.Google Scholar
  100. Uphoff, N. (2000). Understanding Social Capital : Learning from the Analysis and Experience of Participation (pp. 215–249). Social Capital : A Multifaceted Perspective, Washington, D.C. The World Bank.Google Scholar
  101. van Rijnsoever, F. J., Hessels, L. K., & Vandeberg, R. L. (2008). A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers. Research Policy, 37(8), 1255–1266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.020.Google Scholar
  102. Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2007). Reputation beyond the rankings: A conceptual framework for business school research. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(4), 278–304.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550055.Google Scholar
  103. Vukicevic, M., Radovanovic, S., Kovacevic, A., Stiglic, G., & Obradovic, Z. (2015). Improving hospital readmission prediction using domain knowledge based virtual examples. In Knowledge Management in Organizations, 695–706.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21009-4.
  104. Willinsky, J. (2010). Open access and academic reputation. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 57(September), 296–302. Retrieved from http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/10242.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of BusinessUniversiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations