Advertisement

Cohabitation and Marital Expectations Among Single Millennials in the U.S.

  • Wendy D. ManningEmail author
  • Pamela J. Smock
  • Marshal Neal Fettro
Article

Abstract

Cohabitation has surpassed marriage as the most common union experience in young adulthood. We capitalize on a new opportunity to examine both marital and cohabitation expectations among young single women in recently collected, nationally representative data (National Survey of Family Growth 2011–2015) (N = 1467). In the US there appears to be a ‘stalled’ second demographic transition as single young adult (ages 18–24) women have stronger expectations to marry than cohabit and the vast majority expects to, or has, already married. Among young women expecting to marry, the majority (68%) expect to cohabit with their future spouse but about one-third expect to follow a traditional relationship pathway into marriage (to marry without cohabiting first). In addition, women from disadvantaged backgrounds report the lowest expectations to marry, but there is no education gradient in expectations to cohabit. Marriage expectations follow a “diverging destinies” pattern, which stresses a growing educational divide, but this is not the case for cohabitation expectations. Our results, based on recently collected data, provide insight into the contemporary context of union formation decision-making for the millennial generation.

Keywords

Cohabitation Marriage Young adulthood Second demographic transition Millennials Diverging destinies 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development center grants to the Center for Family and Demographic Research at Bowling Green State University (P2CHD050959) and the Population Studies Center at the University of Michigan (P2CHD041028).

References

  1. Addo, F. R. (2014). Debt, cohabitation, and marriage in young adulthood. Demography, 51(5), 1677–1701.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0333-6.Google Scholar
  2. Bogle, R. H., & Wu, H. S. (2010). Thirty years of change in marriage and union formation attitudes, 1976–2008 (FP-10-03). Bowling Green, OH: National Center for Family and Marriage Research. http://www2.bgsu.edu/downloads/cas/file119502.pdf.
  3. Bulcroft, R. A., & Bulcroft, K. A. (1993). Race differences in attitudinal and motivational factors in the decision to marry. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55(2), 338–355.  https://doi.org/10.2307/352806.Google Scholar
  4. Carlson, E. (2018). Reformulating second demographic transition theory. In R. Schoen (Ed.), Analytic family demography (pp. 7–28). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Cherlin, A. (2009). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  6. Cherlin, A. (2014). Labor’s Love Lost: The rise and fall of the working class family in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Clayton, R. R., & Voss, H. L. (1977). Shacking up: Cohabitation in the 1970s. Journal of Marriage and the Family.  https://doi.org/10.2307/351123.Google Scholar
  8. Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
  9. Eggebeen, D., & Dew, J. (2009). The role of religion in adolescence for family formation in young adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(1), 108–121.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00583.x.Google Scholar
  10. Gassanov, M. A., Nicholson, L. M., & Koch-Turner, A. (2008). Expectations to marry among American youth: The effects of unwed fertility, economic activity, and cohabitation. Youth and Society, 40(2), 265–288.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x08314260.Google Scholar
  11. Gibson-Davis, C., Gassman-Pines, A. & Lehrman, R. (2018) "His" and "Hers": Meeeting the economic bar to marriage. Demography, 55(6), 2321–2343.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0726-z.Google Scholar
  12. Gibson-Davis, C. M., Edin, K., & McLanahan, S. (2005). High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1301–1312.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00218.x.Google Scholar
  13. Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Lappegard, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review, 41(2), 207–239.Google Scholar
  14. Guzzo, K. B. (2006). How do marriage market conditions affect entrance into cohabitation vs. marriage? Social Science Research, 35(2), 332–355.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.05.005.Google Scholar
  15. Guzzo, K. B. (2009). Marital intentions and the stability of first cohabitations. Journal of Family Issues, 30(2), 179–205.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x08323694.Google Scholar
  16. Guzzo, K. B. (2014). Trends in cohabitation outcomes: Compositional changes and engagement among never-married young adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(4), 826–842.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12123.Google Scholar
  17. Hemez, P. & Manning, W. D. (2017). Thirty years of change in premarital cohabitation experience (FP-17-05). Bowling Green, OH: National Center for Family and Marriage Research. https://www.bgsu.edu/ncfmr/resources/data/family-profiles/hemez-manning-30-yrs-change-women-premarital-cohab-fp-17-05.html.
  18. Huang, P. M., Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Bergstrom-Lynch, C. A. (2011). ‘He says, she says’: Gender and cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 32(7), 876–905.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x10397601.Google Scholar
  19. Kuo, J. C., & Raley, R. K. (2014). Is it all about money? Work characteristics and women’s and men’s marriage formation in early adulthood. Journal of Family Issues, 37(8), 1046–1073.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x14530973.Google Scholar
  20. Kuo, J. C., & Raley, R. K. (2016). Diverging patterns of union transition among cohabitors by race-ethnicity and education: Trends and marital intentions. Demography, 53(4), 921–935.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-016-0483-9.Google Scholar
  21. Lamidi, E. (2015). Trends in cohabitation: The never married and previously married, 1995–2014 (FP-15-21). Bowling Green, OH: National Center for Family and Marriage Research. https://www.bgsu.edu/content/dam/BGSU/college-of-arts-and-sciences/NCFMR/documents/FP/lamidi-cohab-prev-and-never-married-fp-15-21.pdf.
  22. Lamidi, E. O., Manning, W. D., & Brown, S. L. (2019). Change in the stability of first premarital cohabitation, 1980–2009. Demography (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  23. Lesthaeghe, R. (2014). The second demographic transition: A concise overview of its development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 111(51), 18112–18115.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420441111.Google Scholar
  24. Lesthaeghe, R., & Neidert, L. (2006). The second demographic transition in the United States: Exception or textbook example? Population and Development Review, 32, 669–698.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2006.00146.x.Google Scholar
  25. Lichter, D. T., Batson, C. D., & Brown, J. B. (2004). Welfare reform and marriage promotion: The marital expectations and desires of single and cohabiting mothers. Social Service Review, 78(1), 2–25.  https://doi.org/10.1086/380652.Google Scholar
  26. Lundberg, S., Pollak, R. A., & Stearns, J. (2016). Family inequality: Diverging patterns in marriage, cohabitation, and childbearing. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(2), 79–102.Google Scholar
  27. Mahoney, A. (2010). Religion in families 1999 to 2009: A relational spirituality framework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 72(4), 805–827.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00732.x.Google Scholar
  28. Manning, W. D., Brown, S. L., Lamidi, E., & Payne, K. K. (2014c). Trends in births to single and cohabiting mothers, 1980–2009 (FP-14-05). Bowling Green, OH: National Center for Family and Marriage Research. http://www.bgsu.edu/content/dam/BGSU/college-of-arts-and-sciences/NCFMR/documents/FP/FP-14-05TrendsInBirth.pdf.
  29. Manning, W. D., Brown, S., & Payne, K. K. (2014a). Two decades of stability and change in age at first union formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(2), 247–260.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12090.Google Scholar
  30. Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2007). The changing institution of marriage: Adolescents’ expectations to cohabit and to marry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 559–575.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00392.x.Google Scholar
  31. Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2002). First comes cohabitation and then comes marriage? A research note. Journal of Family Issues, 23(8), 1065–1087.  https://doi.org/10.1177/019251302237303.Google Scholar
  32. Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2005). Measuring and modeling cohabitation: New perspectives from qualitative data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 989–1002.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00189.x.Google Scholar
  33. Manning, W. D., Smock, P. J., Dorius, C., & Cooksey, E. (2014b). Cohabitation expectations among young adults in the United States: Do they match behavior? Population Research and Policy Review, 33(2), 287–305.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-013-9316-3.Google Scholar
  34. McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the Second Demographic Transition. Demography, 41(4), 607–627.  https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2004.0033.Google Scholar
  35. Perrelli-Harris, B., & Lyons-Amos, M. (2016). Partnership patterns in the United States and across Europe: The role of education and country context. Social Forces, 95(1), 251–282.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow054.Google Scholar
  36. Raley, R. K. (2001). Increasing fertility in cohabiting unions: Evidence for the second demographic transition in the United States? Demography, 38(1), 59–66.  https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2001.0008.Google Scholar
  37. Sassler, S. (2004). The process of entering into cohabiting unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(2), 491–505.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00033.x.Google Scholar
  38. Sassler, S., Michelmore, K., & Qian, Z. (2018). Transitions from sexual relationships into cohabitation and beyond. Demography, 55(2), 511–534.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0649-8.Google Scholar
  39. Sassler, S. & Miller, A. (2017). Cohabitation Nation. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sassler, S., & Schoen, R. (1999). The effect of attitudes and economic activity on marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(1), 147–159.  https://doi.org/10.2307/353890.Google Scholar
  41. Scott, M. E., Schelar, E., Manlove, J., & Cui, C. (2009). Young adult attitudes about relationships and marriage: Times may have changed, but expectations remain high (Research Brief). Washington, DC: Child Trends.  https://doi.org/10.1037/e508662011-001.
  42. Smock, P. J. (2004). The wax and wane of marriage: Prospects for marriage in the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 966–973.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00066.x.Google Scholar
  43. Smock, P. J., & Manning, W. D. (1997). Cohabiting partners’ economic circumstances and marriage. Demography, 34(3), 331–341.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3038287.Google Scholar
  44. Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Porter, M. (2005). Everything’s there except the money: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(3), 680–696.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00162.x.Google Scholar
  45. Snyder, A. R., Brown, S. L., & Condo, E. P. (2004). Residential differences in family formation: The significance of cohabitation. Rural Sociology, 69(2), 235–260.  https://doi.org/10.1526/003601104323087598.Google Scholar
  46. South, S. J. (1993). Racial and ethnic differences in the desire to marry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55(2), 357.  https://doi.org/10.2307/352807.Google Scholar
  47. Tanfer, K. (1987). Patterns of premarital cohabitation among never-married women in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 49(3), 483–497.Google Scholar
  48. Taylor, P. (2010). The decline of marriage and rise of new families (Social and Demographic Trends report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. http://pewsocialtrends.org/files/2010/11/pewsocial-trends-2010-families.pdf.
  49. Tucker, M. B. (2000). Marital values and expectations in context: Results from a 21-city survey. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 283–2301). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  50. Uecker, J. E., & Stokes, C. E. (2008). Early marriage in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(4), 835–846.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00530.x.Google Scholar
  51. U.S. Census Bureau. (2018). Table MS-2. Estimated median age at first marriage: 1890 to present. Suitland, MD: U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved June 28, 2018, from https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/demo/tables/families/time-series/marital/ms2.xls.
  52. Vespa, J. (2014). Historical trends in the marital intentions of one-time and serial cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(1), 207–217.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12083.Google Scholar
  53. Waller, M. R., & McLanahan, S. S. (2005). “His” and “her” marriage expectations: Determinants and consequences. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(1), 53–67.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00005.x.Google Scholar
  54. Willoughby, B. (2014). Using marital attitudes in late adolescence to predict later union transitions. Youth and Society, 46(3), 425–440.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x12436700.Google Scholar
  55. Willoughby, B. J., & Carroll, J. S. (2015). On the horizon: Marriage timing, beliefs, and consequences in emerging adulthood. In J. J. Arnett (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of emerging adulthood (pp. 280–295). New York: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199795574.013.31.
  56. Willoughby, B., Medaris, M., James, S., & Bartholomew, K. (2015). Changes in marital beliefs among emerging adults: Examining marital paradigms over time. Emerging Adulthood, 3(4), 219–228.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696814563381.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Center for Family and Demographic ResearchBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and Population Studies CenterUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations