Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 459–482 | Cite as

The Gendered Division of Household Labor over Parenthood Transitions: A Longitudinal Study in South Korea

  • Erin Hye-Won KimEmail author
  • Adam Ka-Lok Cheung
Original Research


Recent research from the gender revolution perspective suggests that men’s increasing involvement in the family domain accounts for the positive association between fertility and female labor force participation in developed Western countries. However, little relevant evidence exists on their Asian counterparts, where lowest-low fertility, low levels of women’s employment, and traditional family values prevail. Using the 2007, 2008, and 2010 waves of the Korean Longitudinal Survey of Women and Families (N = 10,263 couple-waves), we examine how parenthood transitions affect wives’ and husbands’ provisions of household labor and how their employment status moderates this relationship. Focusing on comparisons between first and additional children, we estimate couple fixed-effects regressions. The dependent variables are the time that each spouse spends on household labor and the husband’s share of the couple’s total time spent on this labor. The key independent variables are the number of children and the number interacted with each spouse’s employment status. The results show that household labor was gendered even prior to the birth of the first child. Inequality in household labor increased significantly further with first children, but not with additional children. This increase persisted regardless of women’s employment status, thereby implying that first children might exacerbate the double burden on employed women. Policy lessons are drawn regarding how to raise fertility and female labor force participation in Korea and other countries where women have difficulty reconciling work and family life.


Household labor Parenthood transition Employment Gender inequality Double burden Korea 



This work was supported by the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore.

Supplementary material

11113_2018_9508_MOESM1_ESM.docx (89 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 75 kb)


  1. Anderson, T., & Kohler, H. P. (2015). Low fertility, socioeconomic development, and gender equity. Population Development Review, 41(3), 381–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baxter, J., Buchler, S., Perales, F., & Western, M. (2015). A life-changing event: First births and men’s and women’s attitudes to mothering and gender divisions of labor. Social Forces, 93(3), 989–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., & Haynes, M. (2008). Life course transitions and housework: Marriage, parenthood, and time on housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(2), 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Behr, A., Bellgardt, E., & Rendtel, U. (2005). Extent and determinants of panel attrition in the European Community Household Panel. European Sociological Review, 21(5), 489–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berk, S. F. (1985). The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Best, H., & Wolf, C. (2015). The Sage handbook of regression analysis and causal inference. London: Sage Reference.Google Scholar
  8. Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang, M.C. (2017). Tiredness from overtime seen as badge of honour in South Korea. Straight Times.Google Scholar
  11. Chosunilbo. (2018). Daycare centers under fire after toddler deaths. Retrieved August 20, 2018, from
  12. CNN. (2018). Shocking nursery abuse caught on video. Retrieved August 20, 2018, from
  13. Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1208–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooke, L. P. (2004). The gendered division of labor and family outcomes in Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1246–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooke, L. P. (2009). Gender inequality and fertility in Italy and Spain. Journal of Social Policy, 38, 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Federation of Korean Industries. (2017). Survey of female employees on government policies to raise fertility. Seoul: The Federation of Korean Industries (in Korean).Google Scholar
  17. Gjerdingen, D. K., & Center, B. A. (2005). First-time parents’ postpartum changes in employment, childcare, and housework responsibilities. Social Science Research, 34(1), 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Lappegård, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review, 41(2), 207–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hortaçsu, N. (1999). Transition to parenthood: The Turkish case. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 14(3), 325.Google Scholar
  21. Hwang, J. (2016). Housewife, “gold miss,” and equal: The evolution of educated women’s role in Asia and the U.S. Journal of Population Economics, 29(2), 529–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacobs, J. A., & Gerson, K. (2004). The time divide: Work, family, and gender inequality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Joo, J., Kim, Y., Song, C., Han, J., Sohn, C., Cha, J., et al. (2017). Korean Longitudinal Survey of Women and Families: The 2017 Annual Report. Seoul: Korean Women’s Development Institute (in Korean).Google Scholar
  24. Kim, H. S. (2014). Female labour force participation and fertility in South Korea. Asian Population Studies, 10(3), 252–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim, E. H.-W. (2017). Division of domestic labour and lowest-low fertility in South Korea. Demographic Research, 37, 743–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim, E. H.-W., & Cheung, A. K.-L. (2015). Women’s attitudes toward family formation and life stage transitions: A longitudinal study in Korea. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(5), 1074–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Korean Ministry of Employment and Labor. (2018). Explanations on the revised Labor Standards Act. Seoul: Korean Ministry of Employment and Labor (in Korean).Google Scholar
  28. Kühhirt, M. (2011). Childbirth and the long-term division of labour within couples: How do substitution, bargaining power, and norms affect parents’ time allocation in West Germany? European Sociological Review, 28(5), 565–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, D. M., Kim, T. H., Park, H. J., Lee, H. S., Lee, H. G., Park, S. N., et al. (2011). Korean social trends 2011. Seoul: Statistical Research Institute (in Korean).Google Scholar
  30. Ma, L. (2016). Female labour force participation and second birth rates in South Korea. Journal of Population Research, 33, 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McDonald, P. (2000a). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26(3), 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McDonald, P. (2000b). Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of Population Research, 17(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Myrskylä, M., Kohler, H. P., & Billari, F. C. (2009). Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature, 460, 741–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nagase, N., & Brinton, M. C. (2017). The gender division of labor and second births: Labor market institutions and fertility in Japan. Demographic Research, 36(11), 339–370.Google Scholar
  35. OECD. (2012). Closing the gender gap: Act now. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. OECD. (2017). OECD.Stat (Time spent in paid and unpaid work, by sex).
  37. Rindfuss, R. R., Guzzo, K. B., & Morgan, S. P. (2003). The changing institutional context of low fertility. Population Research and Policy Review, 22(5), 411–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanchez, L., & Thomson, E. (1997). Becoming mothers and fathers parenthood, gender, and the division of labor. Gender & Society, 11(6), 747–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stanfors, M., & Goldscheider, F. (2017). The forest and the trees: Industrialization, demographic change, and the ongoing render revolution in Sweden and the United States, 1870–2010. Demographic Research, 36, 173–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Statistics Korea. (2012). 2012 Statistics on women’s lives. Daejon: Statistics Korea (in Korean).Google Scholar
  41. Statistics Korea. (2014). 2014 Statistics on women’s lives. Daejon: Statistics Korea (in Korean).Google Scholar
  42. Statistics Korea. (2015). 2014 Time Use Survey. Daejon: Statistics Korea (in Korean).Google Scholar
  43. Statistics Korea. (2016). 2016 Fertility statistics. Daejeon: Statistics Korea (in Korean).Google Scholar
  44. Suh, M. H., Yang, M. S., Kim, E. S., Choi, Y. K., Yoo, H. M., Seon, C. K., et al. (2012). 2012 national survey on current status of child care in Korea: A household survey report. Seoul: Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare (in Korean).Google Scholar
  45. Tsuya, N. O., Bumpass, L. L., & Choe, M. K. (2000). Gender, employment, and housework in Japan, South Korea, and the United States. Review of Population and Social Policy, 9, 195–220.Google Scholar
  46. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yavorsky, J. E., Kamp Dush, C. M., & Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J. (2015). The production of inequality: The gender division of labor across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(3), 662–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yoon, J. Y. (2014). Impact of maternity leave and childcare leave on employment. Monthly Labor Review, 6, 34–44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lee Kuan Yew School of Public PolicyNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of SociologyHong Kong Baptist UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations